[问答] 求问一道填空 [复制链接]

10月大战GRE
UID: 3409486

初级会员

Rank: 3 Rank: 3

声望: 57
寄托币: 346
注册时间: 2013-1-26
精华: 0
帖子: 70

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2014-3-6 16:55:10 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

Heinrich Feyermahn, in insisting that Galileo did not fully uphold the tenets of scientific rationalism, does not ____________ the Italian astronomer, but rather the very edifice of Western thought. For if Galileo is the purported exemplar of rational thinking, and yet is ____________, then the history of science cannot be understood as an endless succession of scientists carrying out their work free of all-too-human biases. Thus, Feyermahn admonishes, in faithfully chronicling the sweep of science in the last 300 years, historiographers would be ____________ to not include the human foibles that were part of even the most ostensibly Apollonian endeavors.

Blank (i)
exclusively implicate
partially repudiate
fully espouse
Blank (ii)
found wanting
considered enlightened
dismissed as inconsequential
Blank (iii)
prudent
remiss
contrarian

有点长第三个空不是很明白

相关帖子 Updated by 2026.04.27

0 0

使用道具举报

HelterSkelter
UID: 3499859

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 103
寄托币: 826
注册时间: 2014-2-9
精华: 0
帖子: 189

沙发

发表于 2014-3-6 17:57:19 |只看该作者

我觉得是exclusively implicate, found wanting, remiss
我不是100%清楚，翻译过来应该是这样：
HF坚定地认为伽利略没有完全地坚持科学理性主义的原则，此时HF并不是单单地牵涉伽利略本人，而是牵涉到了整个西方思想的知识体系。因为伽利略是理性思维的典范，如果他被的理论都被认为有所欠缺的话，科学史就绝不可能没有任何偏见的（这句为了通顺，没有逐字翻译）。所以，HF告诫，历史学家如果想忠实地记录过去这300年的科学史，而没有包括任何——即使是最明显的阿波罗式学者也会犯的（这句实在不好翻译。。）——人为错误，那他们一定是疏忽了。

a guy

双非DIY美硕申请总结

使用道具举报