Issue65 学术、工作、生活上看待问题的方法；一致Vs差异

dezhiUID: 156141

明白狒狒的意思了：）

至于中立的态度，如果写成A好＋B好＋（A、B缺一不可，互相补充），我觉得写起来有些难度呀Q！

coniUID: 137677

Issue65 学术、工作、生活上看待问题的方法；一致Vs差异
------摘要------
作者：dezhi 共用时间：45+5分1秒 496 words
从2004年2月19日11时6分到2004年2月19日11时45分
------题目------
People have been so encouraged by society to focus on apparent differences that they fail to see meaningful similarities among ideas, individuals, and groups.
------提纲------
Position : Agree
1、在科学研究过程中，继承和发展一致的观点很重要，一味地追求差异而忽略共性，反而会一事无成。
2、在一个团队或者组织中，基本原则或者理念上的一致性、相同性也很重要。反之，一定要与别人不一样，特立独行之人也往往会被集体所抛弃。
3、让步：一致是要有限度的，没有差异的完全一致是有害的，无论在学术上还是在组织里。
------正文------
Do people fail to see meaningful similarities among ideas, individuals, and groups while focusing on apparent differences encouraged by society, just as the speaker asserts? I fundamentally agree with the speaker, and bolster the suggestion that meaningful similarities should catch people's attention as well.

First of all, similar ideas in scientific research are not less significant than different ones. As we know, scientific and technological development is a process of accumulation (of) absorbing wisdom and intelligent thoughts of forerunners. One needn't become upset when he or she promotes an idea or thought that has been already claimed. To consider and comprehend the similarities between two ideas and then make advancements or form a better solution, is also a success indeed. One of he greatest scientists, Newton, once said that "I can see further just because I stand on the shoulder of giants". This statement best demonstrates the significance of similarities in scientific search.（我不觉得牛顿的这句话可以说明你想表达的问题，他的话如果作为诸如“伟大的科学进步不是一个人可以完成的”还是可以的，但是从他的话中体现不出“相似性”的重要性，你说呢？） On the other hand, trying to search for entirely different ideas without taking meaningful similarities into consideration is most likely to lead to failure in the end.（没有很好进行论证） In a word, similarities make sense in scientific field.（总觉得这段论证的比较单薄，没有什么说服力）

The second reason I would like to point out is that fundamental similarities ought to be encouraged in a group as well. Members in a group come from different environment with various experiences. Then what brings all of them together? It is no doubt that similarity(ies), not differences, serves(serve) it. Perhaps their common interest in playing football, same purpose to pass an examination, or just impetus to communicate with each other makes a group reasonable. Adversely, turning out to be different from the mainstream in a group would probably make itself rejected. Imagine a student who tries to be different at school. If he or she plays video games day after day, make fun of others at dormitories, and cheat in the final examination, he/she would be criticized by the school and teachers, while（这个while放在这是什么意思？） no other pupils would like to play with he/she(him/her) any more.（这个例子也不好，整天玩游戏就是focus on apparent differences 吗？ 我觉得有点跑题了，题目主要是说只“重视明显的不同”而忽视了“相似”， 能说一个成天玩游戏，考试作弊的孩子是在“重视明显的不同而忽视相似”吗？）To conclude, similarity is in need in groups most of the time.

Although I concede that similarities is important in many aspects of our daily life, entire similarity without differences would surely do harm to the society and individuals themselves. Similarity is the foundation of further research and a group, while difference is the motivation of innovation. In scientific field, similarities without differences would make scientists reluctant to figure out innovative ideas or make creative experiments. They would just go behind the authorities, without even criticizing or arguing with them. In such an absurd way, the development of science would be slowed down instead of being stimulated. On the other hand, entire similarities in a group lead to agreement and compromise among group members. Furthermore, it is the different characteristics among group members that make teamwork a really fantastic and pleasant procedure. In the final analysis, entire similarity without differences is not beneficial anyway.（这段不错！）

To sum up, although focusing on apparent differences is important encouraged by society, it is also significant to pay more attention to meaningful similarities among ideas, individuals, and groups.

dezhiUID: 156141

谢谢coni的批改！
这篇Issue写成这个熊样，真是不知道该说什么好了
你对我举的两个例子的看法都有道理，
例子是否能证明论点，我在以后会多加注意的

流浪者UID: 154015

首先科学和团队不能作为两个并列的东西来分方面讨论，不是一个角度的嘛！然后，两个东西不能扩展嘛！有局限性~~~~

一点疑问：题目中给出的三个点：ideas,individuals,groups，本身就只有后两者可以并列，前者和后两者就不是一个角度的。那么是不是非得从同一个角度的不同方面论证呢？