Paradoxically, with all of our natural, intuitive, commonsense capacity to grasp human relations, the science of human relations has been one of the last to develop. Different explanations of this paradox have been suggested. One is that science would destroy the vain and pleasing illusions people have about themselves; but we might ask why people have always loved to read pessimistic, debunking writings, from Ecclesiastes to Freud. It has also been proposed that just because we know so much about people intuitively, there has been less incentive for studying them scientifically; why should one develop a theory, carry out systematic observations, or make predictions about the obvious?
7. The author refers to people who are attracted to "pessimistic, debunking writings" in order to support which of the following ideas? (A) Interesting books about human relations are typically pessimistic. (B) People tend to ignore scientific explanations of human relations. (C) People rarely hold pleasing illusions about themselves. (D) A scientific approach human relations would undermine the pleasing illusions people hold of themselves. (E) It is doubtful that the science of human relations developed slowly because of a desire to maintain pleasing illusions.
8. In the context in which it appears, "paradox" most nearly means ○A diametrical opposition ○B unintended irony ○C stark dichotomy ○D exact counterpoint ○E contradiction to common sense
第8题 irony意思指说一套做一套。或者计划向北结果却往南走了。在这里,只是大家凭常识觉得应该是这样,结果不是这样。所以不一样的。另外paradoxically有两个意思,一个是GRE词汇里的相互矛盾的意思,还有一个是not being the normal or usual kind(韦伯斯特词典)。这个题就是要你猜这第二个意思,所以答案是E。