谢谢你的批改~~建议很有用!!!!
文章不够连贯的话我应该怎么改进呢??
对于你说的agricultural activities 那段 我去看了听力原文
“As for agriculture, it’s true that it too will increase in the future, but not in the way assumed by the reading passage. The truth is, in the United States, less and less land is being used for agriculture every year. Increasing in agricultural production have resulted from and will continue to result from the introduction of new, more productive varieties of crops. These new crops produce more food per unit of land, and as a result, there’s no need to destroy wilderness areas.”
是这样写的 这样不是农业用地减少吗? 还是我理解错误了额。。。。
我个人习惯用cannot, 强迫症...
可以啊,没必要被结构困住,我觉得理由具有相当性吧,而且要切题。至于观点的选择,我的态度是follow your heart,如果对某一个观点有强烈的情怀,一定就一边倒了;如果没啥想法,就找好写的那边写,尽量找三个理由,有说服力就行,米国人思维没那么严谨。Anyway,Pat的小册子好好背,我也是努力在用它。