本帖最后由 tesolchina 于 2015-6-2 21:16 编辑
1) Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a 'Palean' basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean
.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
In the argument, to determine that the Palean baskets are not only made by Palean people, the arguer presented several pieces of evidence, such as the discovery of the same baskets in Lithos and the lack of boat discovery in Palean, and deep,broad river can only be crassed by boat. However, to evaluate the argument, we need a lot more information: transportation method of ancient people in Palean, whether other signs of boats 语法 ever found and whether the basket was brought tothe other shore of the river in a different era.
冒号用的不错
First, more evidence should be provided to exclude the possibility that people can go across the river in (by) other types of transportation (means). Although boats are not found in the area, ancient Palean people might use bamboo shafts or sheep skin balloons to get across the river and bring the basket there. Also we need evidence to show whether the Brim river has changed dramatically. If records show that Brim River has changed a lot from a shallow river to a deep and broad one just two hundred years ago, ancient Palean people could just go across the river and carrying the basket simply by walking or swimming.
sheep skin balloons 这个好神奇的感觉 作为其他可能性 好像不是很靠谱 感觉整段写得挺好
Second, even if the only way to travel across the river is using boat, we may need more information to prove that boat never existed in Palean area. Boat made from wood or bamboo, unlike pottery, are easy to get broken and disposed by nature in a few hundred years. Therefore, no discovery of a completed boats in the area at present doesn't mean they never existed in the area. A lot more evidence, such as Palean history never mentioned boats or even debris of boat never found in the area, would be needed to strengthen the argument.
such as后面是不能跟从句的 Palean history never mentioned boats or even debris of boat never found in the area 而且history- mention 这个搭配也不对 感觉这句话的水平一下子下降了好多
Third, even if there's 时态no boat in Palean and people couldn’t travel to Lithos in prehistoric era, the basket could have been brought to Lithos long after the time it was made. To justify the argumen, we need more information about whether the basket were made in Lithos or otherplaces other than Palean. And other evidence, such as historic record showing that the basket were brought to Lithos in modern time by cars, would greatly weaken the argument.
不太明白你这段提出的可能性 原题的结论是 这个basket不是uniquely Palean information about whether the basket were made in Lithos or otherplaces other than Palean 这个点没有展开写 感觉这不就是题目argue的结论么
请参照一下我的范文
另外请介绍一下写作过程 心得体会 等等
To sum up, to make a cogent argument, we need to gather alot more evidence on transportation method in ancient Palean, existence of boatin Palean and whether the basket found in Lithos were brought from Palean later on.
|