一道逻辑题。谢谢了

minnie_silenceUID：2645012

5.In Diersville the new Environmental Action party won two seats on the seven-member town council in 1988.It lost both of those seats in the 1992 election,even though the party's pro-environment platform had essentially remained unchanged.This decline in the party's fortunes clearly demonstrates that in Diersville environmental concerns faded in significance between 1988 and 1992.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Between 1988 and 1992, the number of eligible voters in Diersville rose, but not the percentage who actually voted.

(B) Between 1988 and 1992, Diersville's leading political party revised its platform, adopting a strongly environmentalist stance.

(C) The parties that ran candidates in the 1992 election in Diersville were the same as those that had done so in the 1988 election.

(D) In 1992 the Environmental Action party won fewer votes in Diersville than it had won in 1988.

(E) Between 1988 and 1992, some measures intended to benefit the environment had been adopted by the town council, but with inconclusive results.

答案是B。我的问题是。题目里面已经明确说明platform是unchanged，为什么还要选B
谢谢了。

gterlannUID：3595027

B选项的主语是谁?你再想想?

这个题目其实挺简单的,pro环境的党派,突然就没人选他了,说明大家不关心环境了,这个是CORE

这题的答案其实不看选项也可以猜一下,环境党的人气流失,除了用环境本身的人气流失来解释,还可以用什么来解释?

或许环境本身并未丢失人气,说不定别人在环境方面做的比他更好所以只不过是党派流失了人气.这就是这个题目的思路;

minnie_silenceUID：2645012

gterlann 发表于 2015-10-24 10:12
B选项的主语是谁?你再想想?

这个题目其实挺简单的,pro环境的党派,突然就没人选他了,说明大家不关心环境了 ...

超级无敌感谢！！！现在我懂了。原来里面有两个党。我对政治不是很敏感。然后也没想过这个new party和leading party是两个不一样的党。谢谢啦！
只可惜这个不能给币。不然王把我所有寄托币都给你。虽然我也没多少。:$:$