关于陈虎平36套里的两道Argument reading

SteveWangUID: 3711000

大家好，在做36套时有两道 Argument题琢磨了半天实在不明白，想请教大家：
第一题 EX 10的第十题 为何D正确？我认为D里的Earlist是不对的...
V-shaped walled structures in central Asia were used by prehistoric hunters who drove hoofed animals into an enclosure at the point of the V. The central Asians who built these structures probably learned this hunting technique from invaders from southwest Asia, because the arrival of invaders from a region in southwest Asia where similar structures had long been used coincides roughly with the building of the earliest of such structures in central Asia.
V形墙结构被中亚史前猎人所应用。中亚人构建这种结构可能是从西南亚的侵略者那里学来的技术，因为侵略者是从西南亚来的，这里（西南亚）相同结构已经应用了很长时间并且与中亚的早期V形墙建筑相同。
Premise：因为侵略者是从西南亚来的，并且这种V行墙结构已经在西南亚应用很长时间，并且与中亚早期的V形墙建筑相同。
Conclusion：中亚人是从西南亚人那里学的捕猎技巧，建立的V形墙
(A) Excavations in the central Asian region do
not indicate whether invaders from
southwest Asia settled permanently in
central Asia.
(B) The V-shaped structures in central Asia
were roughly 70 meters long, whereas the
similar structures in southwest Asia were
usually over 300 meters long.
(C) The walls of the structures in central Asia
were made from earth, whereas the walls
of the structures in southwest Asia
were made of rock.
(D) The earliest examples of V-shaped walled
structures in central Asia were of an
advanced design.
(E) Some of the walled structures used for
hunting in southwest Asia were built well
after the earliest such structures were built
in central Asia.
A．        对中亚的挖掘工作没有显示出来自于西南亚的侵略者在中亚永久定居
B．        中亚的V形结构有70米长，而在西南亚相同结构却又300米长
C．        中亚的墙是用泥土建的，而西南亚却是用岩石
D．        中亚最早的V形墙结构的列子有更牛逼的设计
E．        西南亚一些用于捕猎的墙结构比中亚早期墙结构建立得更好（中亚建立在前西亚建立在后）

第二题是 EX7里的第13题 这道题怎么判断？
The use of heat pumps has been held back largely by skepticism about advertisers‘ claims that heat pumps can provide as many as two units of thermal energy for each unit of electrical energy used, thus apparently contradicting the principle of energy conservation.
13. If the author‘s assessment of the use of heat pumps is correct, which of the following best expresses the
lesson that advertisers should learn from this case?
(A) Do not make exaggerated claims about the
products you are trying to promote.
(B) Focus your advertising campaign on vague
analogies and veiled implications instead of
on facts.
(C) Do not use facts in your advertising that will
strain the prospective client‘s ability to
believe.
(D) Do not assume in your advertising that the
prospective clients know even the most
elementary scientific principles.
(E) Concentrate your advertising firmly on financially
relevant issues such as price discounts and
efficiency of operation
热力泵的使用被怀疑广告语者（广告语：热力泵每使用一单位的电能能够产生多达两单位的热量）所阻碍。
Conclusion：（广告语？！）明显违背了热量守恒定律
如果作者对于使用热力泵的评价是正确的，那么以下哪个能表达广告商应该从这个例子中吸取的教训：
A 不要夸大宣传
B 在广告中要以模糊的类比和含蓄的含义来代替事实
C 不要使用影响潜在客户信任的事实
D 不要在广告语中假设潜在客户知道哪怕是最基本的科学定律
E 集中在钱上

先谢过了！

314159265okUID: 3998171

同问第一道题，没有理解。
第二题好说，答案是C我当时也选的A。这道题题目有问题，原题下面还有blabla很长一段讲实际上这个热泵并未违反能量守恒。题目被截断后产生了误导