8月28-29日 issue第7类同主题写作暨issue模考

SylviaMengyayaUID: 3693199

回复看题

MargueritexyUID: 3788684

Although it seems like utilitarian to consider job availability to decide the field of study, I still agree with this point. With the development of economy and society, there are many fields need exploiting and making research deeper to make more progress and innovation. Where there is demand to exploit or develop, there is job availability. Therefore, the choice of a field of study should be based on availability of the job, which can give you clear career and resources about your future.

To begin with, after college entrance examination, many students decide to go to university because the higher degree they get, the more opportunity of job they gain. Although we may be not very clear about what we want to do in the future, we still consider which field of study can give us good future. Most people plan their life to have a steady and good job after graduating from college or after finishing their study in graduate schools. So when considering about the field of our study, it’s clearer and better for us to take job availability into account because clear aim for job give us exact guidance.

On the other hand, thinking about job availability is like the direction of study and we can find relevant resources and what we need to do during the lifetime in universities. Take myself as an example. I major in public health and I want to continue my study in nutrition when going to graduate school. I made that decision in my fourth year of college. However, when I tried to find a relevant job to have some experience, I was in a dilemma because I don’t have much more experience of research and there are just a few opportunities. Then I find that I’m too late to consider about my career and I miss many resources which can give me much support. I learned from my failure that job availability is closely linked to college study.

In addition, I don’t mean that we just choose a field of study we can find a good job, but it is a basic element. We can also think about interest because inspiration and motivation can encourage us to move on. And there are some other factors such as personality, family and so on. Sometimes it’s controversial among those factors, but I think we need to take job availability at first. We can select in several stages to make sure what we choose to study.

In a word, job is a key issue to everyone and study is an eternal issue through or life. So making a good choice of your study can give us more opportunity of job. Also, everyone can depend on themselves to make choice. But, to be rationale, we need to consider about job availability to help us collect useful information and resources, leading us to doing well in our career.

长长的冬瓜糖UID: 3817701

108

Whether only experts' critical judgement have value?  As far as I am concerned, this question should be determined in a side-by-side basis. That is, in some foundamental subjects such as math and phisics and in the field of engineering, the experts' judgements are more valuable. While in the field of publication of articles, critical judgements from every researcher should be respected.
i
In the foundamental subjects such as mathematic and physics, the critical judgments from university professors are definitely more insightful and accurate than non-expert such as a pupil or construction worker. Devoting most of their time and energy into academic research, those experts must accumulate a large number of basic knowledge in their field and therefore it is these people that can find the flaws in the theory and models accurately. On the other hand, the common, less familiar with the feild and less insightful than the experts, would hardly propose some valuable or proper critical judgements.

It is the same when comes to the field of engineering, especially in the civil engineering. In order to a qualified expert, people must have comprehensive knowledge of various mechanics as well as experience in solving actual problems happening in the construction of a project, maybe the construction of a bridge, a turnel, or a road. Because their opinions concerns the success of a project worthy of billions dollars, people would therefore tend to listen to experts advicement.

However, in the feild of publication of articles, the judgement from every researcher should be considered instead of ignored. As is known to all of us, most academic articals would choose taugh issues that have not being researched thoroughly. Therefore, it is possible that each article would have some flaws or researching points that deserve further study. In this way, any researcher, even if a student can identify some mistakes or propose innovate ideas based on the article. When different researchers judgment and opinions are respects, the fields would be more likely to advance.

In a word, in the civil engineering and basic subjects, only experts critical judgments deserve our attention, while in the field of article publication, non-expert’s judgment and comments are also valuable for the development of a field.

用的pp2模考界面做得 没写完还差结尾段，拷过来花了点时间
这道题没列过提纲，想了5分钟，然后打到第二段发现只有10分钟 了就慌了，也没有想例子，只是简单论证了下，只求考试能考列过的，然后能写完

MaggieLLLLLLUID: 3827790

用那个模拟器做的30min，寄托还是玩的不溜。。。

75.In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

With the development of technology and pervasiveness of media's influence in today's life, it has been more and more difficult for many well-known figures to hide something they would not like others to know. Therefore, many people argue that with more and more flaws being exposed, no living man or woman can be considered as heroes by the society after thoroughly scrutinized by the media. Though it is true for fields like politics, it is not the case when comes to the scientific and business field.

Firstly, it is hard to find a politician that is well-regarded by the overall society as hero giving contradicted nature of the politicians. Often no matter who is considered as a hero by some people, there will always be disparagement from the opposite side. Mostly, politicians are the people who balance the pros and cons when making a formal decision to benefits his or her citizens, but will necessarily to satisfy everyone in the society. In addition, politicians usually hold more authority in the society which leads to more expectation and requirement of citizens on them both in their public and private life. Media nowadays seemed amplify the voices of those who contradicted, when they can pick up every little flaws covered by the media as a point they could call question upon. For example, although president B (没写完这个地方的例子。。。)

However, in fields like scientific field it may not be the case, as the criteria people use to decide whether a particular scientist is a hero or not is rather simple-- simply what the achievement they have made that would benefit the society as a whole. Yuan Long Ping, who was called the father of hybrid of rice, is one of the living hero in scientific field. He improved the quality of hybrid of rice to produce more rice within one plant, which saved hundreds of life of hungry people all over the world. Although media covered many about Yuan's personal life and scientific achievements, the real focus of people are always the achievement he had made.

Similarly, in business world, people are also more open-minded to minimal flaws but focusing on the real achievement the celebrity has been made.  In fact, thanks to constant media exposure and information overload, more and more people started to realize the fact that nobody's perfect, and so do the heroes. Steve Jobs, in his living time, was no doubt considered as a hero because of his significant contribution to smart phones and computers we have been using nowadays. However, at that time, there are many media institutions covering his personal life, revealing him as an arrogant person and an irresponsible father, yet most of the people still see him as the true model in the business field.

To conclude, although heroes are hard to exist in field like politics under closely scrutinize of media because the contradicted nature of politics and people's high standards on these people, it is possible for scientific and business fields to have well-known hero as general public often pay more attention to the real achievement that celebrities in these fields have made.

powerfulbeanUID: 3829312

powerfulbean 发表于 2017-8-29 22:14
模考回复 ：）

College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Nowadays, finding a job after graduating from the school is not easy as the past, so some people argue that college students should choose a field of study regrading to the availability of jobs in that field. However, I strongly disagree with this proposal as it may do harm to the students’ future development in long term. In addition, it can bring to students’ life unhappiness and trouble.

Just base their choice of a field on the availability of jobs may let people choose the field they are not actually interested in. And think about what will happen if someone keep working in the field which he or she is not fond of. They will feel bored about their work not long after they start working, and then they can seldom make a high-leveled achievement in it. People always say that “Interest is the best teacher.” Being strongly enthusiastic about their work can encourage people to forge ahead and keep make progress in this field. As we all know, many scientists, they had made such a huge achievement because they were interested in what they were doing, but not because their research field is popular, take Newton for example, he began to do research in gravity  because he was interested in it, but not it was a popular field.

What is more, only choose a job regardless their interest can bring people trouble more than in the work. If people did not perform well in their work because of choosing a field they are not interested in, they may feel shamed about themselves. They will feel worried even they come back home. Plus, they will feel desperation about life. Many people choose to end their life because they feel no hope in life, and feel so depressed about their career. So, we can see that, in long term, choosing a job only base on the availability of the jobs can lead unhappiness in daily life. But if they choose a job depending on their own interest, they feel excited about life everyday because they are doing the things they enjoy.

Some people may argue that if they did not choose the most available jobs, they can seldom get a job in the future. However, if we scrutinize this argument more carefully, it does not consider about the unpredictable factor of the future. No body can say absolutely that a field of study will not provide enough job for the graduated students. So , if we are not so sure about the future, why not choose a filed that we are fond of and begin to work for it from now on, perhaps our effort can make change to the future that make it become the most popular field.

In conclusion, it is not right to case the choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field, as it can do harm to the future development of ones career, and also have negative impact on their happiness in long term, plus, we should not too much worry about the availability of the field we choose in college because no one know clearly about the future,

PtisenbonandrabbitUID: 3666884

谢谢老师~~

很_简单UID: 3742023

have a try

长长的冬瓜糖UID: 3817701

长长的冬瓜糖 发表于 2017-8-29 22:53
108

Whether only experts' critical judgement have value?  As far as I am concerned, this question should be determined in a side-by-side basis. That is, in some foundamental subjects such as math and phisics and in the field of engineering, the experts' judgements are more valuable. While in the field of publication of articles, critical judgements from every researcher should be respected.

In the foundamental subjects such as mathematic and physics, the critical judgments from university professors are definitely more insightful and accurate than non-expert such as a pupil or construction worker. Devoting most of their time and energy into academic research, those experts must accumulate a large number of basic knowledge in their field and therefore it is these people that can find the flaws in the theory and models accurately. On the other hand, the common, less familiar with the feild and less insightful than the experts, would hardly propose some valuable or proper critical judgements.

It is the same when comes to the field of engineering, especially in the civil engineering. In order to a qualified expert, people must have comprehensive knowledge of various mechanics as well as experience in solving actual problems happening in the construction of a project, maybe the construction of a bridge, a turnel, or a road. Because their opinions concerns the success of a project worthy of billions dollars, people would therefore tend to listen to experts advicement.

However, in the feild of publication of articles, the judgement from every researcher should be considered instead of ignored. As is known to all of us, most academic articals would choose taugh issues that have not being researched thoroughly. Therefore, it is possible that each article would have some flaws. In this way, any researcher, even if a student can propose some inovate ideas according to the

SylviaMengyayaUID: 3693199

SylviaMengyaya 发表于 2017-8-29 22:35
回复看题

Students who will entrance the university always face the problem of major choosing, which is essential to their future. Whether or not students’ choice of their studying field should based on the availability of jobs in that field, from my point of view, depends on what they pursue. For those who want to find a job after graduation and those who have no idea about their future, this argument is true. However, the argument may not hold true for those who want to engage themselves into academic research in a field.

For those who want to find a job after graduation, the availability of jobs in a field is of great importance to them. We all know the great variety of  major in a college. Some pay attention to the practice while some basic subjects pay more attention to the theory. Those more practically based majors have more opportunities to practice in a company or factory and therefore provide students with more work experience and more availability of jobs, which will benefit their further employment. However, if they choose basic subjects as their major, what they learn are almost theories. Which make little sense to employers even if you do well in your major.

For those who have no idea for their future, choose a field of study based on the availability of jobs in that field is a prudent way as well. There are some students who have no idea of what they want to do even what field they would like to engage in. They may find their interest  or may still feel confused after the entrance. For the latter, choosing a field of study with more job  opportunities will provide them with a more stable future. At least, they have accumulated some work experience and will not be too unqualified to find a job. For those who find themselves prefer academic research after study in the college, practice experience will also help  them link theory with practice.

However, for those who want to contribute themselves into  academic research, finding a job may seems less important to them than writing a good essay. What they should do is to study further. Some may argue that these students still have to find a job in the future and there are many unemployed doctoral students. I agree that graduating with a doctoral degree do not ensure employment. However, what we are talking about is college students and for most who want to engage in academic research, they will study further in the future.

写了一个小时 T T

哥特同学UID: 3829477

College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
[Issue 129]


The statement claims that when college student choose a field of study, they should base on the availability of jobs in that field. There is no doubt to consider this factor in priority due to its importance and necessity in career goals and planning. In my view of point, however, the above-mentioned decision is worth thinking more comprehensively. That is to say, people should aware the purpose of studying and what they are studying for at first, as well as how to choose the fields of study insightfully.

To start with, the purpose of studying might vary from person to person. Based on different viewpoints towards the purpose of studying in the college, students would make distinct choices on specific field of study. Some students insist in learning knowledge can acquire classical wisdom to arm their thought. Thus, they would make choice on some fundamental fields such as mathematics or theoretical physics in the university. In another aspect, students who incline to take responsibility for themselves, their family and the whole society when they graduate from college would prefer to choose application fields, such as financial or economy. In addition, if the student’s terminal target for study is for the noble mind, in the other worlds, student who pursuit the self-conscience and the morality, will devoted himself in philosophy or psychology fields.

Moreover, since every jobs in specific field has its own fluctuant life cycles, students should not only focus on the hot fields in his first year at college, but design their college plan by complying with the tendency of the chosen field. On one hand, for some talent student, it is wise to choose their dream field, even cold area which has lower availability for jobs. The earlier has people find what they are really expert in, the more professional will they possibly become in this area. After all, intrinsic curiosity, highly motivation, and long term persistence are all required ability for one to accomplish his career goals. One the other hand, however, despite the lack of extraordinary gift in a field of study, there are still multiple industrial engineering directions for students to choose. Those fields has tight connections between theoretical methods and practical skills. Whenever a student wants to seek a job, they will benefit from the relevant drills in those sunrise fields.

methodology: a) connection between the purpose of study and the availability of jobs in that field. b) general, thorough, investigation. c) self-determination

In conclusion, …

宝宝真的是在用生命写ISSUE……
后面第三段写方法论真的写不动了……
不知道这样的三段论：本质+理想/现实分析+方法论 的结构合不合适……
但显然，宝宝如今的语言水平还驾驭不了orz
明天加油补完……
颤巍巍立下flag的某只，请老师原谅（深鞠躬）！

PtisenbonandrabbitUID: 3666884

How to choose a field of study may confuse a large number of students who are going to attend college. A choice based on the availability of jobs in the field has become widely accepted by students considering the increasingly fierce competition in the job market. However, whether it is a good way to solve the major-choosing puzzle depends on the characteristic of students.

First, for those with high interest in a certain study field, it is a waste of talent and passion to choose a major out of the field of interest. Psychology research has already figured out that people tend to get interested in what they are good at. People can easily find examples of people who accomplish great work in a field that irritates great passion in them. Every industry has its heroes. There is no need to worry about job offers if someone can win the most in the industry and becomes the top.

Second, for students who has little interest in a certain field of study, it is not a wise choice to choose it as their major just because they think it is easy to find a job in it. It is hard to push oneself dip in a field without love. It is possible that they turned out to heat their major when the workload accumulates.

What’s more, if students are just confused about their interests, it may be a good way to think about the problem from the aspect of job availability. As a bright future in their career may encourage them to study hard in the field and as their hard work gets a positive feed back, they may get truly interested in their field of study.

SilverBUID: 3790946

The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

采用从不同角度立意的方法列提纲：政治，军事，经济

To address the issue in the statement, we must clarify what it means to be a great nation and what is the indicator? Different people have diverse opinions. In special fields, such as military and polity, it is undoubted that rulers, scientists, and soldiers achieve the greatness of a nation. On the other hand, In the field of economy, the people general welfare represents the great nation because the development of a nation is measured by gross domestic product (GDP) which is closely related to resident average welfare.

In the field of military, a great nation is presented by the achievement of scientists and soldiers because the great nation should have a powerful military which presented by the technology of weapon and number of troops which is created by scientists and soldiers.
e.g. Nuclear weapons display China's nuclear deterrence

Also, in the field of policy, a great nation should be a systematically good running country, which needs is the achievement of rulers.
e.g. the different of USA and Afghan
The USA has a powerful government while Afghan has a broken government that leads to wars.

On the contrary, in the field of economy, a great nation means people have a high general welfare
and happiness.
The power of the country needs financial support. And the financial base is related people general welfare.

对于本题，我有以下疑惑，还请老师及各位版友帮忙解答：
将一个国家分成不同方面评价是否合理？不谈论题目中的artist, 可以吗？

很_简单UID: 3742023

超时5分钟
As for most of students, the aim of studying in the collage or university is to seek a job and earn money for the rest of the life. Thus, some people would hold the opinion that students should choice their study field depend on the availability of jobs in that field. Howevern, from my perspective, I do not think that opinion is always true because of the following reasons.

Firstly, I want to state that people can not simply establish the relationship between the jobs' availability and individual future career. In the other word, even if there are a lot of jobs avalible in a certain field, it does not means that you must gain one you are satisfied. Because it also depend on other factories. We can image that if a girl who is not interested in coding at all gain a high pay offer from Google, she will not be happy. On the contrary, I believe that she even want to do something interesting in her opinion. Besides, if students do not perform well in that field during university or collage, they would also in a negative position in jobs market.

Secondly, it is universially know that the job markets are constantly changing. So, it is hard to predict the availability of jobs in that field. That is to say, it makes no sense to choose study field depending on the job availibilit. Take the material science and engineering major as an example. Before 2008. due to lack of staffs, many car companies went to universities and recruted material major students. This situation simulated many people to learn that major. However, after 2008, a economy crisis, the car market was influenced greatly and the sell of cars largely decreased. Many material science students did not find jobs. From this example, we may draw a conclusion that the job availibility can not be predicted.

Thirdly, some people may go for the statement that collage students should make their choic by stating that if a field's job availability can indicate a need of the society. More jobs the companies provided, the more need the society. Thus, catering for the need may be benefit to the society. But in fact, many fields which  do not really need in this time do not means that our society do not need it.

To sum up, the choice of a field of study should not depend on the availability of jobs in that field because we can not predict the availability and can not attach it to individual future.

Dover999UID: 3808377

28）The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

rules the checks and balances congress/lawmaking judicial/legislative exactuate/ president
artists Re思想启蒙运动
scientists internet makes people search early it’s possible for the distance children recieve education learning is becomes more and more convenice and accerelate the dissemintion of  knowledge    more medican are made to cure more people     new energe can compensate the unrenewable energy    agriculture product more enough food yuanlongping
general welfare

This statement remind me of a documentary I saw before-The Rise of the Great Powers, which discussed and argued the reasons behind the rise of great states. One of the scholars in the documentary concluded that the requirement of the rise of a state was that it possessed advanced minds. That’s exactly right. So it isn’t the general welfare but the achievements of rules, artists and scientists  that mark the greatness of a state.

After gaining the independence of Great Britain, the rulers of United States sets up an efficient government. The government is consist of three branches, namely Congress (the legislative part), president (the executive part), the courts (the judicial part).  Each branch of the government wields separate and different powers and it can stop one or both of the other branches from becoming too powerful. The three branches make sure that United States develop stably and fast.     
When look back the history of human being, we can see that the artists play a vital role during the process of the rise of a state.

telepathyivanUID: 3790595

8.28-29提纲
issue 28/113/120/121/127/145

The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In regard to the magic code of achieving a great nation, some people assign more significance to the general welfare than the achievements of its rulers, artists and scientists. To define which one plays a more important role, we need to define what a great nation means. A great nation can secure its citizens’ life and life quality, which cannot be attained without those achievements aforementioned. Therefore, I maintain that a balance of these two aspects needs to be constructed to make sure the existence of a great nation.
1. the importance of the achievements
Improve the living quality
Make progress in military and technology
2. the significance of the general welfare
By the people of the people for the people
3. either these two can make sure the existence of the other