- 最后登录
- 2005-3-4
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 182
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2004-10-17
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 78
- UID
- 182510

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 182
- 注册时间
- 2004-10-17
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
发表于 2004-10-18 15:21:30
|显示全部楼层
Nowadays, the concept of ‘individual responsibility’ has been already deeply put in human hearts. has long been placed in the hearts of most people Why? That is because individual is basic of the society and people's behavior strongly effect affect the progress of the society. Due to For the difference among the quality of citizens in every society, we can not simply conclude people's behavior is largely determined by outside forces or by themselves. your position is too ambiguous maybe something like we will find that in some socities the individual's behaviour is greatly influced by others, while in others, that influence is much assuaged
What is exactly meaning of individual responsibility? Why do societies must request persons accountable for their own actions? At the first glance, individual responsibility contains some things like following laws, protecting the rules of the society, concerning social issues and so on. All these things are necessary basic similar meaning, delete one, OR: basic and necessary conditions of the whole society so that each citizen can not escape from his/her responsibilities. Constitution is a convincing example. Constitutions of many countries, the most basic and important law in each country, clearly express that each individuals accountable for their own actions. Therefore, I completely agree with the notion that societies must hold individuals accountable for their own actions. I like this paragraph, answers the 2 intro questions perfectly
In the developed and democratic countries, the senior quality of citizens is likely to be reflected in everyday life. They should own more self-restrained spirit or higher education level than other countries that lie in Africa remember POLITICAL CORRECTNESS - your marker might be an African American, just use something like less developed countries so that they don't need forced means like some extreme laws or violence. Actually, it is a basic individual responsibility that everyone has to totally follow the laws and rules in their living area. For example, Hong Kong owns the lowest crime rate in the world, neither have the city strict law, nor use the city other forced artifices, but the favorable social environment is successfully created by all citizens in the city. In the behind of the lowest crime rate Behind the low crime rate , higher education level and favorable ethic doubtless play more important effect than outside forces in deciding people’s behavior.I'm a little unconvinced, actually, this paragraph would make a great argument topic: Does higher education necessarily lead to lower crime rates? Or does the crime just morph into other less visible forms?
If we turn the orientation of our view and focus on some undeveloped or developing area, we should found find the fact that more violence, crimes and wars often become frequenters in these areas. Meanwhile, our hopes that people determine their behavior will simply stay in a dream but behaviour doesn't have to be good, or "dreamy" because people hardly restrict their actions only by themselves. In another word, these countries need more external force to restrain people's behavior no matter people like or not. Such as, arms force and death sentence. America has death sentence :D Of course, some medias and human right' organizations will drastic against and criticize it, but I believe a truth that you have to understand the real background of some things before criticizing them. this statement might be true, but what's the purpose? we aren't having an argument about the role of media In fact, famine, poverty and race conflicts always are the most complex and important issue in undeveloped countries like Sudan. So the behavior of people in the country is largely determined by forces and I think that it is the best choice in undeveloped areas.
In future, with the development of human societies, the quality of human destines to be improved, and then it is possible that all people's behavior is largely decided by their own making. However, nowadays, different development levels of societies determine that people’s behavior is likely to result in outside forces or their own making or the compound of two means. reasonable conclusion
Apart from some language mistakes, it is a decent essay. But I think you might have interpreted the question a little too liberally. I think the topic means:
个人义务和责任是必要的虚构. 虽然社会必需让个人承担个人行为的后果, 但每个人的行为都大部分因为个人以外的力量而造成 |
|