issue144 内附提纲，写完自己修改后才传上来的，欢迎大家使劲砸。

zhangsx_1982UID: 176926

A=add; R=replace; C=comment; D=delete
Art, the highest[R=deepest] understanding of the world, which records human being’s life and history, provides humanity [A=with]lasting value. Someone asserts that it is the artist, not the critic, gives society something of lasting value. However, for my part, I deem that both artists, who create art works, and critics, who evaluate works of art, are indispensable and equally important in producing such lasting value. What different lies between them is their performing means and different function in creating such lasting values.[I cannot understand this sentence quite well]

Artists reveal their views or[R=and] record what [A=is]happening in the world through their works. The values formed in those[R=of] works are crucial parts in constituting social lasting shared values. Paintings reveal and convey people’s aesthetic preferences. Literatures disclose people’s inner psychological world and feeling needs. Films rebuild and even refine the real world on the screen and usually represent the cotemporary moral and esthetic trends. Music serves as a subtle channel for people to express those things closest to their hearts. All kinds of art works serve as vital medias to develop shared values that underpin the social cohesion.

Undoubtedly, it is artists, who create such art works, create such lasting value directly．Without artists, where [A=does]art works come out? Without works, how do the critics criticize? Losing their criticizing objects, the critics can do nothing to create any kind of lasting values.[这段的观点和我的意思一样，哈哈，不过好像没你表达的这么明白]

However, critics’ contribution in constructing such lasting value should not be neglected. An important function of art is to be appreciated by the public. However, in most cases, a piece of artwork rather[D] reveals the aesthetic preference or the inner mental world of the artist who create it [A=rather]than appeal to [cater to ]the public appetite[D]. It is quite common that many invaluable art works cannot be well understood or widely accepted by the public. The history of art tells that people ever[R=often] neglected[R=neglect, C=历史告诉的真理性质的东西是不是可以一般时] many great art works in long time[D]. In such situation, even the art works contain great values, if it cannot be disclosed to the public, they may lose the lasting value they deserved. The importance of critics is more likely to be evaluated reasonably in such circumstances. People may find the critics may[D] do even more contributions in uncovering such potential value of those neglected art works to the public. Such disclosure can be regarded as reproduction of lasting value in certain levels.

In a word, both artists and critics play crucial roles in creating or disclosing the lasting values of artworks. They just work in different ways. While artists create lasting values through constructing artworks, critics disclose or reproduce lasting values through evaluating artists’ works.
我觉的你的文章意思比较明确，层次也不错。写的挺好。我的那篇改了又改，今晚总算改的比较满意了，大家有空再看看怎么样。我自我感觉是挺好的了。不像第一篇，混混沌沌，也不像第二篇，虽然想创新（blur说值得支持的哟）但有点说不清道不明。其实我一开始就是想写同意artist的。没想到第一篇写出来却是那样，多亏有大家长眼，不然连ets忌讳都要犯了，呵呵，说实在的以前我还真不知道有这种忌讳呢。

zhangsx_1982UID: 176926

Value is usually regarded as the price of something or as relative worth, utility, and importance( such as “value” in “a good value at the price” ). But when it comes to lasting value, it is quite obvious that it means the latter kind of value , and the price of something always fluctuate. It is the artist who creates art which is indispensable in our lives and can be viewed as something of lasting value. And it is the critic who often helps us understand art, chooses those first-rate artworks and gives the artist in time feedback which is quite important and can also be viewed as something ( though untouchable) of lasting value.

Then it is sure that the artist gives society of something lasting value. As we all can feel- art which presents color, music, dance and etc, is the weekend party, the music from car radio, the toys babies played with…Art serves as fantasy, communication, and gives us great enjoyment, tranquility, characteristics and future. We cannot imagine the world without art. The beauty of art and the resonance when we appreciate artworks usually can not be measured by money. For example, some historic architectures such as Forbidden City and Great Wall, are the emblem of our nation and should not be evaluated by its price and they are priceless. Further more, the enjoyment when we dabble in art is something cannot be sold.

When it comes to the critic, though the ideas of the critic help us understand the art works, they often mislead us. Art is something spiritual, emotional, and different people have different understandings, but the critic is more able to make their ideas public which prevent us from discovering our own thoughts and indirectly undermine our appreciation when their comment is the mainstream. Take "starry night" (drawn by Van Gogh and was sold at an extremely high price recently) for example. When the work was first published, it was questioned and was not accepted by critics. The ideas of the critics at his time then inhibited this kind of art from being popular. And the critic at Van Gogh’ time fail to recognize the lasting value of his work.

Furthermore, the creation and inspiration is more likely the inane qualification of the artist and the critic’ feedback usually destroy them. Van Gogh at first made progress by learning from other painters and was influenced by the critic. But his works were just imitating at that time. It was when he neglected the comment of the critic, did not want any attention of the critic and only care about the painting that he made great progress . And the progress in fact was the result of his creation which seemed to be endued by God.

Well, from the reasons stated above, we can get into a conclusion that it is artist who give our society something of lasting value, and the critic do give society values, but they usually mislead us and have a negative effect on the artist.  

这篇应该算是清晰，明确，条理清楚，哈哈自己太臭美了。大家看看是不是啦。