issue110 历史类

haiyaUID: 187989

------题目------
When we concern ourselves with the study of history, we become storytellers. Because we can never know the past directly but must construct it by interpreting evidence, exploring history is more of a creative enterprise than it is an objective pursuit. All historians are storytellers.
------正文------
Does the historian equal storytellers in the study of history? The vacancy in history demands historian to create some plots so that they are storyteller insofar as they respect the fact in history.

On the one hand, from the part of history evidence, since many evidences about a period in history always suffer rot and weathering, the insufficient evidences remain vacancies in history. Today, what we are able to gain mostly are limited in fossils, jewelry and documents and so forth. Thus, comparing to the long history, these information seems like irrelative fragments apparently. But, in fact, they are inherent internally. These fragments are like pearl and wait for historian to string them together by their creativity. Consider the extinction of Dinosaur. There do exist many fossils to justify the existence of such huge beings in our earth ever. Nonetheless, we have no evidence to explain why Dinosaur extinct after the boom of Jurassic just as happening in a night. Absence of sufficient evidence to demonstrate the history, it is mysterious and need the creativity of historian to glue the boom of Dinosaur to the initial of next period harmoniously.

On the other hand, a good historian is not a recorder. He should be creativity enough to explain and judge some history issue.

First, as human beings, their curiosity and activity to unveil the truth in history prompt them to create appropriate assumption on unknown period. Referring to the recorded history and existed evidence, a good historian able to establish the causal relationship between two history fragments. Similarly consider the issue of Dinosaur once more. Two major explanations are put forward to demonstrate its extinction. Some allege that the eruption of volcano cause the exaction of Dinosaur while others ascribe the extinction to a clash between an unknown planet and earth. According to the known information, these two explanations are both reasonable. It is historian's creativity that inform us the possible reason about the death of Dinosaur. Thus, no matter which assumption is the truth, they both fill the vacancy in history reasonably.

Second, some recorded historic individual are controversial so that the study of history is inevitably subjective course. Actually, historians are different in many aspects, such as nationality, culture background, knowledge structure, religion. Thus historian depict multi-dimension of historic individual and issue with their creativity. A case in point is within the study of American history. The judgment of president, Ronald Reagan, is between two completely opposite views. Some regards him as Hero since the arms race which he advocated eventually results in the disaggregation of Soviet Union and end up the cold war. It guaranteed the United States became the super nation later. Whereas, others criticized Reagan on his economical policy because it caused the great deficit ultimately. If the study of history is just the record of objective facts, how will the history become? It is through the analysis and creativity of certain individual and period that the history is substantiated and flourished.

Last but not the least, albeit the history need creativity, the primary and fundamental principle of the study of history is to respect for the fact. Any action such as make unfounded assumption or crook the history will betray the initial principle. Even when history serves for entertainment and art, a good “story” is not replete with making-up unwarranted details but developed on the basis of history. When historians ignore the reality in history and season it with their exaggeration and falsehood, he will become only a storyteller but eligibility historian.

To sum up, like other realms, the study of history needs historian’s wisdom and talent to develop on the basis of fact. To interpreter a history is not just to record the existed evidence. What’s more, to make reasonable analysis and assumption is also essential. This is what the creativity lies in.

sailing_yfUID: 150982

It guaranteed the United States became the super nation later. Whereas, others criticized Reagan on his economical policy because it caused the great deficit ultimately.Whereas只有在句中，如果主谓一致可以省略主谓语
好文

指向大海UID: 158737

These fragments are like pearl and wait for historian to string them together by their creativity. 第2段的这句话真的很好,不知道是不是自己写的中文式英文?

感觉你的文章越写越好了呢,精华区由2篇110.有一篇和你意见相反,可以参考一下.

fengboallanUID: 157405

楼主词汇量果然非同小可，还有好多G次在其中使用啊

Does the historian equal storytellers in the study of history? The vacancy in history demands historian to create some plots so that they are storyteller insofar as they respect the fact in history.比较佩服，简洁，而且表达意思很完整，说出了自己的想法。不过开头可以设计一下：某些专家人士正在讨论……………，然后引出文章的观点

On the one hand, from the part of history evidence, since many evidences about a period in history always suffer rot and weathering证据的不完整，我觉得用rot和weathering的词汇搭配不太稳定。建议使用unsound，不知好不好。如果指得是历史遗迹，那就最好别用evidence代替它们, the insufficient evidences remain vacancies in history. Today, what we are able to gain mostly are limited in fossils, jewelry and documents and so forth. Thus, comparing to the long history, these information seems like irrelative fragments apparently. But, in fact, they are inherent internally. These fragments are like pearl and wait for historian to string them together by their creativity. 这句话写得太棒了！赞Consider the extinction of Dinosaur.这句好像少了主语，还是启使句？ There do 用indeed更好exist many fossils to justify the existence of such huge beings in our earth ever. Nonetheless, we have no evidence to explain why Dinosaur extinct after the boom of Jurassic just as happening in a night. Absence of sufficient evidence to demonstrate the history, it is mysterious and need the creativity 换成imagination怎么样of historian to glue the boom of Dinosaur to the initial of next period harmoniously.

On the other hand, a good historian is not a recorder. He should be creativity enough to explain and judge some history issue. 这样说怎么样：(on the orther hand ,a good historian is not only a recorder who would like to tell us  some known facts but also has ability to use his imagination to explain and judge some history issue.just like a good lawer were not a record machine of corpus juris.)

First, as human beings, their curiosity and activity to unveil the truth in history prompt them to create appropriate assumption on unknown period. 这句话概括的非常好Referring to the recorded history and existed evidence, a good historian able to establish the causal relationship between two history fragments. Similarly consider the issue of Dinosaur once more想想换个例子怎么样. Two major explanations are put forward to demonstrate its extinction. Some allege that the eruption of volcano cause the exaction of Dinosaur while others ascribe the extinction to a clash between an unknown planet and earth. According to the known information, these two explanations are both reasonable. It is historian's creativity that inform us the possible reason about the death of Dinosaur. Thus, no matter which assumption is the truth, they both fill the vacancy in history reasonably.

Second, some recorded historic individual are controversial so that the study of history is inevitably subjective course. Actually, historians are different in many aspects, such as nationality, culture background, knowledge structure, religion. Thus historian depict multi-dimension of historic individual and issue with their creativity. A case in point is within the study of American history. The judgment of president, Ronald Reagan, is between two completely opposite views. Some regards him as Hero since the arms race which he advocated eventually results in the disaggregation of Soviet Union and end up the cold war. It guaranteed the United States became the super nation later. Whereas, others criticized Reagan on his economical policy because it caused the great deficit ultimately. If the study of history is just the record of objective facts, how will the history become? It is through the analysis and creativity of certain individual and period that the history is substantiated and flourished.

Last but not the least, albeit the history need creativity, the primary and fundamental principle of the study of history is to respect for the fact. Any action such as make unfounded assumption or crook the history will betray the initial principle. Even when history serves for entertainment and art, a good “story” is not replete with making-up unwarranted details but developed on the basis of history. When historians ignore the reality in history and season it with their exaggeration and falsehood, he will become only a storyteller but eligibility historian.

To sum up, like other realms, the study of history needs historian’s wisdom and talent to develop on the basis of fact. To interpreter a history is not just to record the existed evidence. What’s more, to make reasonable analysis and assumption is also essential. This is what the creativity lies in.


写得真的不错，后面真的看不动了
困死了，明天我再上来接着看吧

看看我得怎么样，虽然没法和你得比，但是也得想着进步啊
http://211.151.90.54/bbs/showthread.php?s=&threadid=246174

deannaaUID: 145017

占位先，

poohUID: 146994

来，让JJ 吻一下，:)


------题目------
When we concern ourselves with the study of history, we become storytellers. Because we can never know the past directly but must construct it by interpreting evidence, exploring history is more of a creative enterprise than it is an objective pursuit. All historians are storytellers.
------正文------
Does the historian equal storytellers 怎么前面historian用单数，后面stroyteller用复数呢 in the study of history? The vacancy in history demands historian to create some plots so that they are storyteller insofar as they respect the fact in history.insofar as是指一个条件，但是respect the fact 并不是成为storytellers的条件。
你的观点是什么呢？最好明确地说一下。
你对historian是更倾向于creative enterprise还是objective pursuit也没有表态。

On the one hand, from the part of history evidence, since many evidences evidence没有复数 about a period in history always suffer rot and weathering, the insufficient evidences remain vacancies in history. Today, what we are able to gain mostly are are mostly limited in fossils, jewelry and documents and so forth. 前面说都是空白，后面又说还有些片断，有点矛盾 Thus, comparing to the long history, these information seems like irrelative fragments apparently.罗索，已经有seems like了，去掉apparently  But, in fact, they are inherent internally. These fragments are like pearl and wait for historian to string them together by their creativity. Consider the extinction of Dinosaur. There do exist many fossils to justify the existence of such huge beings in our earth ever. Nonetheless, we have no evidence to explain why Dinosaur extinct after the boom of Jurassic just as happening in a night什么叫就像在晚上发生的一样，改成as they disappeared overnight Absence of sufficient evidence to demonstrate the history, it is mysterious and needneeds the creativity of historians to glue the boom of Dinosaur to the initial of next period harmoniously.最后这半句不懂

On the other hand, a good historian is not a recorder. He He or she should be creativity creative enough to explain and judge some history issueissues. 单复数问题注意一下，看到不少此类问题

First, as human beings, their curiosity and activity to unveil the truth in history prompt them to create appropriate assumption on unknown period. Referring to the recorded history and existed existing  evidence, a good historian is able to establish the causal relationship between two history historic fragments. Similarly consider the issue of Dinosaur once more. Two major explanations are put forward to demonstrate its extinction. Some allege that the eruption of volcano cause the exaction of Dinosaur while others ascribe the extinction to a clash between an unknown planet and earth. According to the known information, these two explanations are both reasonable. It is historian's creativity that inform us the possible reason about the death of Dinosaur. Thus, no matter which assumption is the truth, they both fill the vacancy in history reasonably. 这个例子的描述重点应该放在历史学家怎样发挥他们的想象力来得出两种推论，这个过程是重要的。如果能从这个过程的角度来写会更好的。，这段语言还不错。

Second, some recorded historic individual 复数！ are controversial so that the study of history is inevitably a subjective course. Actually, historians are different in many aspects, such as nationality, culture background, knowledge structure, religion. Thus historian depict multi-dimension of historic individual and issue with their creativity. A case in point is within the study of American history. The judgment of president, Ronald Reagan, is between two completely opposite views. Some regards him as Hero since the arms race which he advocated eventually results in the disaggregation of Soviet Union and end up the cold war. It guaranteed the United States became the super nation later. Whereas, others criticized Reagan on his economical policy because it caused the great deficit ultimately. If the study of history is just the record of objective facts, how will the history become? It is through the analysis and creativity of certain individual and period that the history is substantiated and flourished. 这个例子有问题，因为这个例子是历史学家对一个历史人物的评价不同，而不是对他的历史事件的疑问。也就是说他们都承认里根发起了军备竞赛这个事件，，只不过对于这个事件的历史意义有争议罢了。所以你说If the study of history is just the record of objective facts, how will the history become? 这当然是有可能的了。历史学家的评价不是历史本身

Last but not the least 这个短语表示跟上面顺接，但是你这段明显是转折的，去掉这个短语吧 , albeit the history need needs creativity, the primary and fundamental principle of the study of history is to respect for the fact.respect the fact 就ok了  Any action such as make unfounded assumption or crook 字面意思不见得都会有引申意义，改成distort the history will betray the initial principle. Even when history serves for entertainment and art, a good “story” is not replete with making-up unwarranted details but developed on the basis of history. When historians ignore the reality in history and season it with their exaggeration and falsehood, he will become only a storyteller 你thesis里面同意历史学家是storyteller了，这跟这里矛盾 but eligibility eligible historian.

To sum up, like other realms, the study of history needs historian’s wisdom and talent to develop on the basis of fact. To interpreter a history is not just to record the existed evidence. What’s more, to make reasonable analysisanalyses and assumptions is also essential. This is what where   the creativity lies in.

语法上的毛病：
名词单复数不分
动词单复数形态不分
把名词当形容词修饰名词

思路比较清晰，论证还可以，例证也比较丰富，写得不错，呵呵，看来你下了不少功夫啊，继续保持！

haiyaUID: 187989

谢谢pooh姐姐和 fengboallan 的详细批改。我这几天身体不舒服，一到晚上，不能看太晚，不然耳朵就一直痛到脑袋里，（ 让家人担心了）。所以，文章都没有时间及时回复和修改。

这篇文章是昨晚写的。刚开始写的时候，精神就开始委靡。还好提纲先前已经详细列过。觉得是每天的作业，还是坚持写完。后来就在word里检查了一遍，也没复读。实在是撑不住了当时。

谢谢了。好，我开始认真看~~~

haiyaUID: 187989

------题目------
When we concern ourselves with the study of history, we become storytellers. Because we can never know the past directly but must construct it by interpreting evidence, exploring history is more of a creative enterprise than it is an objective pursuit. All historians are storytellers.
------正文------
Does the historians equal storytellers in the study of history? From my part, the vacancy linking the fragments in history demands historian to create some plots so that they are storytellers with the premise that they respect the fact in history.
我的观点是第二句，加了个from my part；我用insofar as 是想说在尊重历史的前提下，历史学家是讲故事的人，能用insofar as吗？我一直以为insofar as是在什么的范围内

On the one hand, from the part of history evidence, since much evidence about a period in history always suffer rot and weathering, the insufficient evidences remain vacancies in history. Today, what we are able to gain are mostly limited in fossils, jewelry and documents and so forth. Thus, comparing to the long history, these information seems like irrelative fragments, among which there exist much vacancies. But, in fact, they are inherent internally. These fragments are like pearls and wait for historian to string them together by their creativity. Consider the extinction of Dinosaur. There do exist many fossils to justify the existence of such huge beings in our earth ever. Nonetheless, we have no evidence to explain why Dinosaur extinct after the boom of Jurassic just as they disappeared overnight. In the absence of sufficient evidence to demonstrate the history, it is mysterious and needs the creativity of historians to glue the boom of Dinosaur to the initial of next period harmoniously.
最后一句是想说：缺少足够的证据来解释这段历史，它显得神秘，而且需要历史学家的创造力去把恐龙的繁荣期和下一个时期的最初时期和谐地“粘”起来*^^*

On the other hand, a good historian is not a recorder. He or she should be creative enough to explain and judge some history issues.

First, as human beings, their curiosity and activity to unveil the truth in history prompt them to create appropriate assumption on unknown period. Referring to the recorded history and existing evidence, a good historian is able to establish the causal relationship between two historic fragments. Similarly consider the issue of Dinosaur once more. Two major explanations are put forward to demonstrate its extinction. Some depend on the information about the activity of volcano to allege that the eruption of volcano cause the exaction of Dinosaur while others ascribe the extinction to a clash between an unknown planet and earth referring to the initial forming process of earth. According to the known information, these two explanations are both reasonable. It is historian's creativity that informs us the possible reason about the death of Dinosaur. Thus, no matter which assumption is the truth, they both fill the vacancy in history reasonably.

Second, some recorded historic individuals are controversial so that the study of history is inevitably a subjective course. Actually, historians are different in many aspects, such as nationality, culture background, knowledge structure, religion. Thus historians depict multi-dimension of historic individual and issue with their creativity. A case in point is within the study of American history. The judgment of president, Ronald Reagan, is between two completely opposite views. Some regards him as Hero since the arms race which he advocated eventually results in the disaggregation of Soviet Union and end up the cold war. It guaranteed the United States became the super nation later. On the contrary, others criticized Reagan on his economical policy because it caused the great deficit ultimately. Basing on the different view points, the historians incline to link different historical issues to establish the causal relationship when they interpret a period of history. If the study of history is just the record of objective facts, how will the history become? It is through the analysis and creativity of certain individual and period that the history is substantiated and flourished.
可能我对于历史研究本身与pooh姐姐的理解不同。因为经常看到某某历史学家对于某历史人物的评价。根据历史，每个人的着眼点不同，这就会产生对于个人的褒贬和作用的评价不同。那他描述一段历史时就倾向于把一些事物的因果关系连起来讲，而淡化另一些关系。我在里面又加了一句，不知这样能否有力解释我的想法

Albeit the history needs creativity, the primary and fundamental principle of the study of history is to respect the fact. Any action such as make unfounded assumption or distort the history will betray the initial principle. Even when history serves for entertainment and art, a good “story” is not replete with making-up unwarranted details but developed on the basis of history. When historians ignore the reality in history and season it with their exaggeration and falsehood, he will become only a storyteller but eligibility eligible historian.
我同意历史学家是讲故事的人，但不同意讲故事的人都是历史学家。是不是又想naiba评我的文时，觉得有点绕？我的意思是说，如果他不尊重历史乱create的话，那他只是一个讲故事的人，而不是一个合格的历史学家。要尊重历史的create

To sum up, like other realms, the study of history needs historian’s wisdom and talent to develop on the basis of fact. To interpreter a history is not just to record the existed evidence. What’s more, to make reasonable analyses and assumptions is also essential. This is where the creativity lies in.


to pooh, 谢谢帮我的指正，很多单复数和词性真的麻烦你了。昨天写的时候就开始困了。所以就把word里的红扛扛去掉，就贴了。感觉有点不负责任。。。当时就想算是昨天的作业，对自己也算一个交代。有些你的问题，我就在修改时一起回答了

to fengboanlan. Consider.....应该是个固定句式，用来举例子的。功能类同于for example.你的一些意见挺好的。

我明天帮你改文吧，可以吗？我的脑袋又要吃不消了：（。
btw，一定要相信自己。没有写得差的，只有写得不认真的：）

poohUID: 146994

我的观点是第二句，加了个from my part；我用insofar as 是想说在尊重历史的前提下，历史学家是讲故事的人，能用insofar as吗？我一直以为insofar as是在什么的范围内

差不多的意思，就是引出一个条件。

可能我对于历史研究本身与pooh姐姐的理解不同。因为经常看到某某历史学家对于某历史人物的评价。根据历史，每个人的着眼点不同，这就会产生对于个人的褒贬和作用的评价不同。那他描述一段历史时就倾向于把一些事物的因果关系连起来讲，而淡化另一些关系。我在里面又加了一句，不知这样能否有力解释我的想法

可以啊，那就应该多花些笔墨说清楚这层关系。


生病了，那就先好好休息，作文可以先放一下，或者躺在床上列列提纲什么的。

fengboallanUID: 157405

哈哈，haiya妹妹（pooh自称自己23，我也23，所以我是GG），pooh说的那个粘，呵呵，当时我也没有看懂。呵呵，中文说，粘，这种生动的表达方式，特好，但是老外能不能看得懂就是另外一回事了。比如班门弄斧，英文就是：教鱼游泳，很多表达方式不一样的。不过，你都没怎么修改就能到达这种程度。看来限时也没问题了。文章写得非常好，小毛病都会有。努力注意一下啊就好了。

还有，对于例证的理解各有不同，只要自己解释得明白就行。别自己云里雾里就好了。


小小的建议，只能是锦上添花呵呵
早日恢复健康！