Issue32 不同学科教师工资 拍我者48小时之内回拍

flyfish9UID: 156664

A school or college should pay its teachers at the same rate in all disciplines, regardless of differences in salaries for related fields in the world outside of school. For example, entry-level teachers in mathematics and in the arts should receive the same pay, even if outside of school, math specialists earn a much higher salary on average than do specialists in the arts.

提纲：
观点：（反对）不同学科的教师工资应该有所区别
1.工资平均化不公平。首先不同专业的教师在学生阶段付出的学费是不同的，再者不同专业教师工作难度不同
2.工资平均化不符合经济规律。紧俏专业教师的工资就应该高，这才满足供求关系
3.工资平均化会使得在社会上能够拿到工资的专业的教师感到不公平，可能造成他们转业，带来这些专业教师流失的社会问题

Is it a reasonable deed that a school or college pay its teachers at the same rate in all disciplines, regardless of differences in salaries for all related fields in the world outside of school? At the first glance, this suggestion seems sound and fair. But it is an absolute mistake if we consider it seriously. It is not only unfair, but also against the economics regularity, furthermore probably causes serious social problems.

It is unfair if teachers in different disciplines get the same pay. There are two reasons as follows. First, tuitions are different when these teachers are students in college or university. In my university, students of MBA will spend more than ten thousand dollars a year, but correspondingly students in the major of mechanics or electricity will spend only about one thousand dollars. When they are graduated from university, students of MBA should certainly get higher pay because they devoted more. Secondly, the difficulty for teachers' work in different disciplines is not at the same level. Math teachers suffer more because their major are much harder than that of art teachers. So, if both of these differences are ignored and all teachers are paid at the same rate, it is actually unfair.

The same-pay suggestion is not only unfair, for the reasons above, but also against the economics regularity. As we know, if purvey is more than demand, the price will rise. Thus it is reasonable for teachers in some disciplines got higher salaries if specialists in these areas are less in quantity and more needed. Regardless of this, we may break the economic rule and make the wrong decision to average teachers' pay.

Finally, the decision to make teachers' in different disciplines receive the same pay will cause serious social problems. Teachers in the higher-pay areas will be more likely to change their jobs than those in lower-payment areas. And the higher-pay areas will suffer a more and more serious lack of teachers. Then teachers remain in these areas will also feel more and more unfair to get the same pay and desire to leave, making the problem more serious.

To sum up, if we consider of justness and the economic regularity, and avoiding social problems, we should keep the difference in salary among disciplines. Maybe it is a necessary job for us to decide teachers of what disciplines should get higher pay, but it is absolutely wrong to make salaries be the same.

深谷幽兰UID: 196550

我也刚好写完这一篇，一起探讨探讨吧！


There is,currently,a debate over the issue that weather school or college teachers in different disciplines should receive the same salary.Some people assert that  in spite of great distinguishes on salary outside of school,teachers,who teach different courses in school,should not be paid lower or higher.However,in my point of view,the salary of the teachers should be considered according to many factors that I will mention as following.

In the first place,the amount of the salary evaluates the quantity of the work that the teacher consentrates on and what influence will be made,in the future,to the secioty.A good fact goes as that,at present time,it is obviously that the time amount of different disciplines varies sharply in students' curriculum.Take the education in China for example,such courses as mathes,physics,chemistry and English will probably takes as many as twenty to thirty hours for students to study with the help of the teachers in shool every week,respectively.On the contrary,however,some other disciplines as art,music,history and biology seize as few as only one or two hours per week,which ,to some extent,desides the work amount for teachers of different disciplines,therefore requires them to put different effort on their work.On the other hand,specialists on certain field are likely to be needed more urgently by the society during certain era of the human history.Consequently,it is undoubtedly that work made by teachers of the vary disciplines will be considered more valuable to the whole society,which is also a standard for evaluation of the teacher' salary.

In addition,a shool or college,as a constitute of the society,which contains a large quantity of transformation day by day,should take steps to achieve a leading place over other opponents.Take the universities in the USA for example,it is known to all that in this country,there are as many as three hundreds universities or colleges.To be outstanding among all of them,the authority should impove ceaselessly on various aspects and excellent teachers will surely catch a lot of weight.In order to not only keep its own  nice faculty but also make itself an attration to the specialists outside,offering a high salary is a good choice,which will,as a result ,establish the university or college as a competent one.

To sum up,due to the discussion above,a shool or college should pay its faculty in light of various factors,such as the quantity of time they  spend to their work and what infuluence will be made to both the society and the shool or college itself.

深谷幽兰UID: 196550

我们的提纲好像是一样的吧！我忘记写老师转行那一段了：Ｐ
你的表达能力不错，不过例子似乎少了一点，观点的语气是不是太强硬了？
还是很值得我学习啊！^_^

flyfish9UID: 156664

最初由 深谷幽兰 发布
[B]我们的提纲好像是一样的吧！我忘记写老师转行那一段了：Ｐ
你的表达能力不错，不过例子似乎少了一点，观点的语气是不是太强硬了？
还是很值得我学习啊！^_^ [/B]

呵呵，提纲一样啊，那可真是所见略同了。
我看了你的文章，提点意见吧。
1. school 你特别爱写成shool
2.  你正文一共只写了两段，第一段又这么长。是不是把第一段的两个分论点分成两段写更加清晰？我的文章主要是考虑到已经有三段了，所以才把前两个可以合成的论点合起来了
3. 最后一段你写的“以提高优秀教师工资来增强学校的竞争力”，似乎有些跑题，因为题目强调的是不同专业之间教师的工资差别，而不是优秀教师和普通教师的工资差别。

xiongyicnUID: 192745

A school or college should pay its teachers at the same rate in all disciplines, regardless of differences in salaries for related fields in the world outside of school. For example, entry-level teachers in mathematics and in the arts should receive the same pay, even if outside of school, math specialists earn a much higher salary on average than do specialists in the arts.

提纲：
观点：（反对）不同学科的教师工资应该有所区别
1.工资平均化不公平。首先不同专业的教师在学生阶段付出的学费是不同的，再者不同专业教师工作难度不同
2.工资平均化不符合经济规律。紧俏专业教师的工资就应该高，这才满足供求关系
3.工资平均化会使得在社会上能够拿到工资的专业的教师感到不公平，可能造成他们转业，带来这些专业教师流失的社会问题

Is it a reasonable deed that a school or college pay its teachers at the same rate in all disciplines, regardless of differences in salaries for all related fields in the world outside of school? At the first glance, this suggestion seems sound and fair. But it is an absolute mistake if we consider it seriously. It is not only unfair, but also against the economics regularity, furthermore不是连词，而是adv,and futhemore，并且少了一个主语。不过不妨碍理解furthermore probably causes serious social problems.

It is unfair if teachers in different disciplines get the same pay. There are two reasons as follows. First, tuitions are different when these teachers are students in college or university. In my university, students of MBA will spend more than ten thousand dollars a year, but correspondingly students in the major of mechanics or electricity will spend only about one thousand dollars. When they are graduated from university, students of MBA should certainly get higher pay because they devoted more. Secondly, the extent of diffculty，仅仅一个diffculty放这里感觉不太好理解the difficulty for teachers' work in different disciplines is not at the same level. Math teachers suffer more because their major are much harder than that of art teachers. So, if both of these differences are ignored and all teachers are paid at the same rate, it is actually unfair.
第一段的理由我觉得缺少逻辑性，一定是付出多就一定需要收获多，并且收获有很多种方式，比如精神上的收获。当时付出那么多只是别人的interests而已，并不打算以后多挣钱。也许他们以取得了很高的学术成就为目标，而不是简单的金钱来衡量。我觉得你的第二个理由很好，完全可以充分展开一些，不要第一个
The same-pay suggestion is not only unfair, for the reasons above, but also against the economics regularity. As we know, if purvey is more than demand, the price will rise. Thus it is reasonable for teachers in some disciplines got higher salaries if specialists in these areas are less in quantity and more needed. Regardless of this, we may break the economic rule and make the wrong decision to average teachers' pay.

Finally, the decision to make teachers' in different disciplines receive the same pay will cause serious social problems. Teachers in the higher-pay areas will be more likely to change their jobs than those in lower-payment areas. And the higher-pay areas will suffer a more and more serious lack of teachers. Then teachers remain in these areas will also feel more and more unfair to get the same pay and desire to leave, making the problem more serious.
B2和B3都是 很好的reason，可惜没有full-development，是不是限时了，到后来时间比较紧？
To sum up, if we consider of justness and the economic regularity, and avoiding social problems, we should keep the difference in salary among disciplines. Maybe it is a necessary job for us to decide teachers of what disciplines should get higher pay, but it is absolutely wrong to make salaries be the same.

flyfish9UID: 156664

xiongyicn已经给你改了第二篇(sensorship)，如有不当还请多多指正

flyfish9UID: 156664

沉了，自己顶一下:)

zqimagineUID: 193623

如题

flyfish9UID: 156664

最初由 zqimagine 发布
[B]如题 [/B]

怎么可能？
雷同都是背范文才有可能造成的。
只是提纲一样，论据、语言都有差别，不可能被判雷同。