Issue 36 (社会类，机经) 新鲜出炉，还冒着热气呢，谢谢大家拍砖

chenxgUID: 183868

其实限时是一件痛苦的事情。
The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
同意这个观点
（1）自然科学领域的例子。达尔文Darwin的进化论，
（2）而政治领域的例子。日本发动侵略战争，当时国内都很赞成，但是现在开来不是这么回事吧。
（3）admittedly，有些东西只能由同时代的人评价。例如艺术领域

Whether individuals are great or not includes many factors, however I think the most important factor that evaluate the greatness is the contribution to the whole society. The issue that the greatness of individuals can be decided by those who live after them or by their contemporaries are rising. Through reflection once more, I prefer the former on several grounds.

In natural field, there are several examples to support my opinion. If society regards individuals as greatness, he or she should have done some contributions to the society, and these contributions have generated huge impacts on our life or our ideas. For example, the theory of evolution, finished by Darwin, is about the evolution of human being. When published, it was impossible for most people to receive the fact that human being come from monkey. Darwin was received many misunderstandings. However, with development of research, the theory of evolution has become more popular and many people think it is reasonable for evolution of human being. The example tells us that true idea need many years even several generations to be accepted by society. Then there are listed examples like that, such as Copernicus, who insisted that sun is the center of the universe not Earth. The main reasons of these examples are attributed to the lack ability of their contemporaries in understanding the world. However it is different case for those who live after them. Probably they have educated well and have the ability of recognizing the unbelievable fact.

On the other hand, in political field there are examples. Take the Second world war as an example, during that horrible years, many Japanese thought their nation was the best excellent in the world and it was obvious that they should own rich resource of world. Unfortunately, they took for granted that the emperor of Japan was the great man. However, it is the blind loyalty to emperor that gives people of Asian huge sorrow. Nowadays, it is well known that Japan make a mistake to break out the wrong war and nobody considers that the emperor of Japan is great. As a result, the greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.

Admittedly, there are some special situations that the greatness of individuals can be decided only by their contemporaries. For example in art field, some art works can be judged by contemporaries. It is because these works were made under special periods different to ours. For better understanding these art works, it is necessary to learn about the culture and custom in that time. Therefore, it is very difficult for us to understand completely.

From above discussion, in most situations, the greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, and in some special situations, it can be decided by their contemporaries.

victoriazhizhiUID: 163135

晕了，我快改完了的时候word坏掉，自己关闭了。
最近电脑一直抽风，今天用galaxysong的软件写的作文也自己关了，没了。
算了，不回去重新改了。提几个意见吧：
1，第一段最后一句有些奇怪的说。
2，对达尔文的例子描述过于详细，占用了很多笔墨，不如省来时间和文字进行对例子的分析。达尔文后那一句分析分析的不准确。难道真理都要N辈子才能被接受？不如说在科技领域，有很多理论过于深奥，或者经常与当代流行的观点相悖，所以要N年的慢慢验证才得以证明为真。这段最后两句建议先说因后说果，比较顺畅一些，而起你的因分析的不具体深入，没有明白的说明为虾米后人就可以有判断了什么的就不同了？还用了probably显得推断的意味很多。
3，B2 不长的一段就只有一个例子，没有分析，这样会让你的论证只停留在表面的地步，不具有说服力，要加以深入的分析。
4，B1B2共有的问题：一个是例子描述太详尽分析显得比例较少，二是这两段的开头都是there are examples 给我的感觉是你就是要列出来例子完事儿，这样的TS一是废话，而是没有把你的观点，对问题的分析表现出来，不建议这样的TS开头。
5，B3的it is because后面开始说的乱套，没有明白。觉得前后联系不大。
6，总的感觉，不够深入，每段都是for example分析的少了。而且你的那个admittedly让步要看和前面什么联系在让，要分析一下，你只说了例如艺术就要现代评价，这样有些特殊化而且武断了，凡高的画不是死了才被看成宝贝的么？还是对这问题的复杂性分析不够。

别的没虾米问题，这个思路也不错，因为我一开始只想着为虾米要当代评论后人评论觉得很难想，你分领域说倒是比较creative，只是分析不够。

chenxgUID: 183868

因为这是节后第一次限时写issue，自己也觉得写的比较烂。尤其是每段的TS。我也同意你的看法。
一会我重新修改一下再贴上来，谢谢你啊！

chenxgUID: 183868

The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
同意这个观点
（1）自然科学领域的例子。达尔文Darwin的进化论，
（2）而政治领域的例子。日本发动侵略战争，当时国内都很赞成，但是现在开来不是这么回事吧。

Whether individuals are great or not includes many factors, however I think the most important factor that evaluate the greatness is the contribution to the whole society. The issue that the greatness of individuals can be decided by those who live after them or by their contemporaries are rising. Through reflection once more, I prefer the former as following.

In natural field, many theories are so profound or violated from the popular views of the period that it is difficult for their contemporaries to decide the greatness of individuals. If society regards individuals as greatness, he or she should have done some contributions to the society, and these contributions have generated huge impacts on our life or our ideas. For example, the theory of evolution, finished by Darwin, is about the evolution of human being. When published, it was impossible for most people to receive the fact that human being come from monkey. Darwin was received many misunderstandings. However, with development of research, the theory of evolution has become more popular and many people think it is reasonable for evolution of human being. The example tells us that true idea need many years even several generations to be accepted by society. Then there are listed examples like that, such as Copernicus, who insisted that sun is the center of the universe not Earth. The main reasons of these examples are attributed to the lack ability of their contemporaries in understanding the world. In fact, in natural field these situations are very common, mostly because these new ideas conflict with the standard of society in that period. As a result their contemporaries cannot understand the new ideas. Whereas when those who live after them experience studying many related subjects and receiving new ideas, they have the ability to judge whether the greatness of individuals or not.

On the other hand, in political field it is not proper to decide the greatness of individuals because of the limitation in recognition. Take the Second world war as an example, during that horrible years, many Japanese thought their nation was the best excellent in the world and it was obvious that they should own rich resource of world. Unfortunately, they took for granted that the emperor of Japan was the great man. However, it is the blind loyalty to emperor that gives people of Asian huge sorrows. Nowadays, it is well known that Japan made a mistake to break out the wrong war and nobody considers that the emperor of Japan is great. The main reason that cause war happened is that Japanese could not realize that all of people have the same right to live, and there are no difference among people in different regions. However, government of Japan made use of this point and exaggerated the excellence of Japanese and loyalty to emperor of Japan. Consequently, it is wrong to decide the greatness of individuals by their contemporaries. If do so, the emperor of Japan is a great man, which is an obvious mistake.

From above discussion, because of the recognition limitation of their contemporaries, we can easily conclude that the greatness of individuals can be decided by those who live after them,  not by their contemporaries in both natural field and political field.