Issue36 同主题写作，自认逻辑还不错的一篇

windpassmeUID: 153908

As the speaker claims, the individual's greatness is only decided by the people who live after them. However, since any critics about any one varies in accordance with the changing criteria as the time passes by, the speaker and most of us here have an illusion that we decide the greatness of our ancestors. Exactly speaking, all the "greatness" we now disapprove has been discarded no matter how great the greatness was in its time.

One illusion that we often encounter is the evaluation of scienctific achievement, which many persons believe that never could we criticize immediately because of the inaccurate instruments, philosophical judgment, the benefit conflict of contemporaries and so forth. Frankly speaking, those achievements are usually nevertheless the theories or experience nearest to the truth and best corresponding to the needs of their time, hence they are perhaps of great importance than any other things of that time. As well as considering the circumstance those inventions or theories coming from, they may be far greater than their successors. Take Newton's classic mechanics as an example, now we all know its just a roughl equation of the relative theory, yet at that time, 16th century, there is no doubt that the equation is the most precise description of  the physical university and useful enough- humans  that time  are very capable of understanding and utilizing that theory, and as one of my friends noted, if Einstein had lived that time he had been doomed to be regarded to be insane and so had his theory,  never  could there be a single person thought highly of him, if he still could have the ability to deduct the relative theory at such a poor condition.

Another illusion that we also neglect in our daily life is relate to the literature, music and anything referring to the human spirit. We all say Mozart is a great musician and Shakespeare playwright at present, due to and only due to the morale, the spirit and the way they express the enthusiasm highly according those we long hold. Just as today's women believe the slimmer the better whereas in the 19th century the aesthetical standard was totally inverse-the fatter the better. What we regard as beauty is all constrained by the contemporarily thought, and so do the greatness.

Admittedly, the attainments filtered by the time are more of greatness in some degree. However, as for my part, that is accredit to two reasons: first, the survival work must have some value that often have much more crucial influence on us that we human are more likely to preserve. To be more detailed, Toyetoewsike is perpetuated for his sensitive care about human's final destiny, which an immortal issue as long as we human live. Second, to be offensive, it is certainly because of our laziness and trepidation. We are too lazy to question whether it really acts as its and, at least at some times we do not have the brevity either.

The greatness differs not only from time to time, but also you and me. Therefore, we all have the right to decide the greatness and also never will we become the only criterion in the and infinite time

davidjackyUID: 135962

把你的思路写到同主题写作精华贴那里，按照我给的格式进行发表，希望多讨论，可以和朽木白哉caudillo在那个地方好好讨论互改一下

Mars3000UID: 198477

[B]写的很好，令小弟汗颜，这里仅提出几点参考建议供参考。[/B]
[B]since any critics about any one varies in accordance with the changing criteria as the time passes by, the speaker and most of us here have an illusion that we decide the greatness of our ancestors. Exactly speaking, all the "greatness" we now disapprove has been discarded no matter how great the greatness was in its time[/B]
这个是论点吗，如果是就是说从历史的观点看我们的评价也未必是正确的，因为我们也只是时间长河中的匆匆过客。那么下面的论证是否应由这一出发点展开。
爱因斯坦的例子很贴切，但个人以为牛顿的例子对观点的支持不够，是为了和爱因斯坦的例子进行对比吗？但似乎总感觉有些漏洞，因为对牛顿的评价在当时和现在差异并不大。

偶是新手，这里妄加评论了，万望勿怪。
下面是小弟痛苦熬出来的拙劣之作，如果兄台有时间就帮忙看看，多提批评意见。
https://bbs.gter.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=252235
https://bbs.gter.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=252935