issue151, 三月新题，改了一边，请留连接

wicwawaUID: 199056

第而次限时成功，还留了两分中检查，有点兴奋
望大家给我泼点凉水， 谢过先
High-speed electronic communications media, such as electronic mail and television, tend to prevent meaningful and thoughtful communication.



Do high-speed electronic communications media encourage people to give quick and less meaningful answers and promote superficial, communications or not? In my point of view, the answer could differ from cases to cases, especially considering electronic mails and television. However, the determinant  for meaningful and in-deep communications is not due to these devices, but human being themselves.

First of all, let us consider the influence of e-mail. As we can see, the e-mail and its support-----internet have provided people with the great convenience , since people could contact with each other in different places in any places of world given having a internet access. Therefore, the e-mail does provide the function to enable family reunion and friends regathering, although it could not provide a face-to-face communication. However, just this characteristic gives people more time to think deeply about the content he/she writes and whether there have something ignores and not well represent the original meaning. So we could easily conclude the merit of e-mail to promote people thinking deeply and writing more thoughtful and meaningful .


Turning into the aspect of public media, of which television is the primary representative. In some perspectives, it does really encourage people to do thoughtful communications. For example, it is usually a family routine to watching TV for news program together after supper in China. And after the program, a discussion even a fierce controversy would be aroused on the contents od the news, no matter local, national, or international subjects. From this sense, we should admit that television do provide opportunity for family members engaging into thoughtful discussion and communications. However, in another perspective, television also acts as a negative force to make people into a inertial situation without independent thinking. Today, TV programs have already become the baby-sitters for many parents have less time to look after children and participate in their activities. Moreover, considering those who  want to avoid positive communication with others and better place to enjoy self-comfortableness, TV programs just become the ideal shelter .Thus, from what I have mentioned, television and also public media promote people both positive and negative influence on meaning and thoughtful communication in term of respective perspective.

One thing I should mention is that to different people, the influence of high-speed communication media would turn out to be greatly different. To those who are engaged in positive thinking and hoping to communication with others, no matter what high-speed media is, he/she would not be influenced and further try every effort to use the media in his/her ideal and proper way. On the contrary, to those lack interests in communication and often passively accept facts and information, even if the media which mostly intend to promote thoughtful thinking and communication would turn out to be ineffective. Therefore, as my assertion, it is the quality, values and attitude of people to communication determine their action and ways of communication, and the media  only exhibit partly influence on people.

In sum, different  kinds of electronic media could provide different impact to people in terms of the way of communications. However , for those who truly prefer  meaningful and thoughtful communication, they could engage in their preference in whatever condition, facing whatever communications media.

有砖必回
https://bbs.gter.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=253162

ZEALPALADINUID: 192560

High-speed electronic communications media, such as electronic mail and television, tend to prevent meaningful and thoughtful communication.



Do high-speed electronic communications media encourage people to give quick and less meaningful answers and promote superficial, communications or not? In my point of view, the answer could differ from cases to cases, especially considering electronic mails and television. However, the determinant for meaningful and in-deep in-depthcommunications is not due to these devices, but human being themselves.

First of all, let us consider the influence of e-mail. As we can see, the e-mail and its support-----internet have provided people with the great convenience , since people could contact with each other in different places in any places of worldchange into 'in varied places of the world' given having a internet access. Therefore, the e-mail does provide the function to enable family reunion and friends regathering, although it could not provide a face-to-face communication. However, just this characteristic gives people more time to think deeply about the content he/she writes and whether there have something ignoreschange into 'whether they ignore something ' and notdid not well represent the original meaning. So we could easily conclude the merit of e-mail to promote people thinking deeply and writing more thoughtful and meaningful .


Turning into the aspect of public media, of which television is the primary representative. In some perspectives, it does really encourage people to do thoughtful communications. For example, it is usually a family routine to watching TV for news programs together after supper in China. And after the programs, a discussion even a fierce controversy would be aroused on the contents odof the news, no matter about or onlocal, national, or international subjects. From this senseaspect?, we should admit that television do provide opportunity for family members engaging into thoughtful discussion and communications. However, in another perspective, television also acts as a negative force to make people into a inertial situation without independent thinking. Today, TV programs have already become the baby-sitters for many parents have less time to look after children and participate in their activities. Moreover, considering those who want to avoid positive communication with others and better place to enjoy self-comfortablenesscomfort, TV programs just become the ideal shelter .Thus, from what I have mentioned, television and also public media promote people both positive and negative influence on meaning and thoughtful communication in term of respective perspective.I do not think it is a good choice to make concession within a paragraph,it should be in a new one.

One thing I should mention is that to different people, the influence of high-speed communication media would turn out to be greatly different. To those who are engaged in positive thinking and hoping to communication with others, no matter what high-speed media is, he/she would not be influenced and further try every effort to use the media in his/her ideal and proper way. On the contrary, to those lack interests in communication and often passively accept facts and information, even if the media which mostly intend to promote thoughtful thinking and communication would turn out to be ineffective. Therefore, as my assertion, it is the quality, valuesvaluation and attitude of people to communication determine their action and ways of communication, and the media only exhibit partlyextrinsic influence on people.

In sum, different kinds of electronic media could provide different impact to people in terms of the way of communications. However ,删掉这个词，你已经用了好多遍了 for those who truly prefer meaningful and thoughtful communication, they could engage in their preference in whatever condition, facing whatever communicationscommunicating medias.

It is the first time for me to amend a Issue, and if you are free, just check out my issue in the below area of signiture, thanks

wicwawaUID: 199056

谢谢两位， 今天我发烧了要早点睡， 明天中午必去你那拍转

dot699699UID: 175798

考G可得好好爱惜身体啊~~          ^_^