ISSUE38 电视时代读书是否有用，第一次限时用了90分钟。还按老规矩，你拍我我必拍

dvdwormUID: 168213

38"In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books."

Is reading books not as important as it once was and can we learn as much by watching television as by reading books, as the speaker claims? As far as I am concerned, I disagree with the assertion.

Admittedly, we can learn a lot by watching television. Television can bring us kinds of programs, from these programs we are able to get the knowledge of history, culture, art, geography, etc. Take the famous TV program "Discovery" for example, by vivid pictures and deep analysis, this TV program inform people a lot and encourage us to think our past and our future. I used to think I should care about myself and why bother to care others, but after watching programs of "Discovery" I come to realize that my behavior will influence others and if somebody do wrong I should stop him to do so. In my college, some students threw their useless batteries freely in the past, my partners and I volunteer to collect those batteries and suggest our college to found a useless batteries collection center and now we do have such a center in my college.

However, what we learn from the TV is superficial under most circumstances and to get full and deep knowledge we still need to read books. I learn this from the construction of the batteries collection center. To inform students in our campus their behavior is detrimental to the environment, my partners and I decided to write a report to our campus newspaper. But we found to finish the report our knowledge from the TV program is not enough, we still have to get more detail information and data from books. To attract audience, most TV program about the real person and real event have been revised by the directors, so the person and the event we see on the screen is not what he or it should be .If we want to know a historical person or event fairly we have to read the historical books. This is the same thing to get knowledge of culture, art, geography, etc.

Moreover, reading books is more convenient to get knowledge than watching TV .TV set need electricity to work, but books need not .You cannot carry TV set with you everywhere, but you can put books in your pockets or bag and bring them everywhere. You cannot watch TV program as you like, to watch your interested program you have to schedule your time because if you don not turn on your TV set at the right time you will miss it, and those boring advertisements will waste you a lot of time. However, to read your interested book you can read it anywhere and anytime as you like, this will save you a lot of time compared with watching TV.I still remember there were a TV series last year which is based on a famous novel, to watch it fully on TV, I had to use two months. But I used just two weeks to finish reading the original novel.

In summary, on the one hand, although we can learn a lot by watching television, the knowledge from TV is more superficial than from books. On the other hand, reading books is more convenient than watching TV. Therefore reading books is as important as it once was even if in the age of television.

开头原本想写完了补多点，可是天！居然用了90分钟，所以就不补了，保持限时原貌吧

zhoulin00001UID: 189304

那我先占座了
等吃完饭给你改

zhoulin00001UID: 189304

Is reading books not as important as it once was and can we learn as much by watching television as by reading books, as the speaker claims? As far as I am concerned, I disagree with the assertion.

Admittedly, we can learn a lot by watching television. Television can bring us kinds of programs, from these programs we are able to get the knowledge of history, culture, art, geography, etc. Take the famous TV program "Discovery" for example, by vivid pictures and deep analysis, this TV program inform people a lot and encourage us to think our past and our future. I used to think I should care about myself and why bother to care others, but after watching programs of "Discovery" I come to realize that my behavior will influence others and if somebody do wrong I should stop him to do so. In my college, some students threw their useless batteries freely in the past, my partners and I volunteer to collect those batteries and suggest our college to found a useless batteries collection center and now we do have such a center in my college.[这不是是电视的独有特征吧，书也可以做到啊？]

However, what we learn from the TV is superficial under most circumstances and to get full and deep knowledge we still need to read books. I learn this from the construction of the batteries collection center. To inform students in our campus their behavior is detrimental to the environment, my partners and I decided to write a report to our campus newspaper. But we found to finish the report our knowledge from the TV program is not enough, we still have to get more detail information and data from books. To attract audience, most TV program about the real person and real event have been revised by the directors, so the person and the event we see on the screen is not what he or it should be .If we want to know a historical person or event fairly we have to read the historical books. This is the same thing to get knowledge of culture, art, geography, etc.[这有点勉强吧？]

Moreover, reading books is more convenient to get knowledge than watching TV .TV set need electricity to work, but books need not .You cannot carry TV set with you everywhere, but you can put books in your pockets or bag and bring them everywhere. You cannot watch TV program as you like, to watch your interested program you have to schedule your time because if you [don] not turn on your TV set at the right time you will miss it, and those boring advertisements will waste you a lot of time. However, to read your interested book you can read it anywhere and anytime as you like, this will save you a lot of time compared with watching TV.I still remember there were a TV series last year which is based on a famous novel, to watch it fully on TV, I had to use two months. But I used just two weeks to finish reading the original novel.[这条是不是要考虑录象的作用呢？]

In summary, on the one hand, although we can learn a lot by watching television, the knowledge from TV is more superficial than from books. On the other hand, reading books is more convenient than watching TV. Therefore reading books is as important as it once was even if in the age of television.
[总体感觉不错，条理很好，语言也不错，继续努力]

tcaactUID: 186901

38"In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books."

Is reading books not as important as it once was and can we learn as much by watching television as by reading books, as the speaker claims? As far as I am concerned, I disagree with the assertion.（可以再加点具体的意见）

Admittedly, we can learn a lot by watching television. Television can bring us kinds of programs, from these programs we are able to get the knowledge of history, culture, art, geography, etc. Take the famous TV program "Discovery" for example, by vivid pictures and deep analysis, this TV program informs  people a lot and encourages us to think our past and our future( think about the past as well as the future , 是不是好一些？). I used to think I should care about myself and why bother to care others （不大明白~~）, but after watching programs of "Discovery" I come to realize that my behavior will influence others and if somebody do wrong I should stop him to do so. In my college, some students threw their useless batteries freely in the past, my partners and I volunteered to collect those batteries and suggested our college to found a useless batteries collection center and now we do have such a center in my college.

However, what we learn from the TV is superficial under most circumstances and to get full and deep knowledge we still need to read books. I learn this from the construction of the batteries collection center. To inform students in our campus their behavior is detrimental to the environment, my partners and I decided to write a report to our campus newspaper. But we found to finish the report our knowledge from the TV program is not enough, we still have to get more detail information and data from books. To attract audience, most TV programs about the real person and real event have been revised by the directors, so the person and(or) the event we see on the screen is not what he or it should be .If we want to know the fact of a historical person or event (fairly) we have to read the historical books. This is the same thing to get knowledge of culture, art, geography, etc.

Moreover, reading books is more convenient to get knowledge than watching TV .TV set needs electricity to work, but books need not .You cannot carry TV set with you everywhere, but you can put books in your pockets or bag and bring them everywhere. You cannot watch TV program as you like, to watch your interested program you have to schedule your time because if you don not turn on your TV set at the right time you will miss it, and those boring advertisements will waste you a lot of time. However, to read your interested book you can read it anywhere and anytime as you like, this will save you a lot of time compared with watching TV.I still remember there were(was) a TV series last year which is based on a famous novel, to watch it fully on TV, I had to use two months. But I used just two weeks to finish reading the original novel.

In summary, on the one hand, although we can learn a lot by watching television, the knowledge from TV is more superficial than from books. On the other hand, reading books is more convenient than watching TV. Therefore reading books is as important as it once was even if in the age of television.

呵呵，看完了，大小写问题得注意哦。
Discovery 是很好的例子，可以好好再展开些，自己的例子应该再扩充一下，要不说服力好像少一些~~

viviansiUID: 190413

38"In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books."

Is reading books not as important as it once was and can we learn as much by watching television as by reading books, as the speaker claims? As far as I am concerned, I disagree with the assertion.

Admittedly, we can learn a lot by watching television. Television can bring us kinds of programs, from（ these programs）which we are able to get the knowledge of history, culture, art, geography, etc. Take the famous TV program "Discovery" for example, by vivid pictures and deep analysis, this TV program inform people a lot and encourage us to think about our past and our future. I used to think that 最好加上 I should care about myself and（ why bother to care others）这里有点问题把, but after watching programs of "Discovery" I come to realize that my behavior will influence others and( if somebody do wrong I should stop him to do so).i should stop someone who wants to do wrong In my college, some students threw their useless batteries freely in the past, my partners and I volunteer to collect those batteries and suggest our college to found a useless batteries collection center and now we do have such a center in my college. 自己的例子不是很有力，最好换一个，

However, what we learn from the TV is superficial under most circumstances and to get full and deep knowledge we still need to read books.这个过度句不是很流畅，表达的也不太清楚 I learn this from the construction of the batteries collection center. To inform students in our campus that their behavior is detrimental to the environment, my partners and I decided to write a report to our campus newspaper. But we found to finish the report our knowledge from the TV program is not enough, we still have to get more (detail information and data)details and data  from books. To attract audience, most TV programs about the real person and real event have been revised by the directors, so the person and the event we see on the screen is not what he or it should be .If we want to know a historical person or event fairly we have to read the historical books. This is the same thing to get knowledge of culture, art, geography, etc.

Moreover, reading books is more convenient to get knowledge than watching TV .TV set need electricity to work, but books need not .You cannot carry TV set with you everywhere, but you can put books in your pockets or bag and bring them everywhere. You cannot watch TV program as you like, to watch your interested program you have to schedule your time because if you don not turn on your TV set at the right time you will miss it, and those boring advertisements will waste you a lot of time. However, to read your interested book you can read it anywhere and anytime as you like, this will save you a lot of time compared with watching TV.(I still remember there were a TV series last year which is based on a famous novel, to watch it fully on TV, I had to use two months. But I used just two weeks to finish reading the original novel.)这个论据不用第一人称写会更好点

In summary, on the one hand, although we can learn a lot by watching television, the knowledge from TV is more superficial than from books. On the other hand, reading books is more convenient than watching TV. Therefore reading books is as important as it once was even if in the age of television.

viviansiUID: 190413

我觉得你的思路还是不错的，而且文章的架子也出来了，只是在论证方面显的没那么有力，在语言方面在加强一点，逻辑更紧凑一点应该会很好的，举例子的话最好不要用自己的事情不把，你有的时候在宾语重句 后忘加that 我也老忘，可能是平时省略惯了。

只是我的一点看法 ，我自己在论证方面很烂 的，郁闷中