鬼谷子 我欠砖 留连接

wicwawaUID: 199056

3。28决战南大，寻砖友
Reform is seldom brought about by people who are concerned with their own reputation and social standing. Those who are really in earnest about reforming a government, an educational system, or any other institution must be willing to be viewed with disdain by the rest of the world.

Are reforms always brought by those who are devoted in reforming and not concerned with their own interests, such as reputation and states quo? As my point of view, a truly and thoroughly reform really need a leader who is earnest in the reform itself. However, it may not be true that reformers would always ruin reputation and social standing as a result of reform.

To begin with, any one who want to conduct reform truly need to get a preparation of  attacks and also resistance from the society, since the nature of reform is doom to be distain by a certain group of people .Reform is the way to change the status quo to some extent and more or less impairs some people's vested interests as it is conducted. It is also true that no one would prefer to give up their own social standing, privilege and also economic advantages. Thus ,by the time the reform is brought out , these people would definitely stand out as the primary resistance to reform and try every effort to demonstrate the reform brings more disadvantages than the possible benefits. Moreover, the reformer would also be these resistance 's targets which could further calumniate the reform and mislead the majority which are in neutral position. In history ,as we could perceive, when Copernicus publish his theory of Heliotropism, the Roman Papacy turn their abuse on him and also disabuse him as heresy. Therefore, as the example illustrated, reformers of any field should be ready of attack from particular groups.

Further, people who are only concerned with their own reputation ,generally speaking, could not conduct a reform, at least a thoroughly and effective one. These kind of people would hesitate whether to continue when their own interests are at stake, since their objective is not reform to benefit the society, but to reform to maintain reputation or gain reputation. However, even in every reform, it involves the situation of the ruining of social standing and reputation of reformers, at least in the beginning of reform. Take the Qin Dynasty of China as example. The government in the later nineteenth century did claim for a reform in order to keep up with the world trend. But in fact, their only objective is to maintain their dominating position and just utilized a few superficial measures which were still far away from the usual way of western world. Finally, the mass overturn the government and began the real reform of China.
Thus, the evidence surely demonstrate my assertion that only not concerning with own' sake, could the reformer achieve success.

In addition, I should admit that reformers does not always lead to a situation of declination in reputation and social standing. The reform is largely a redistribution of interests in certain perspective, and the reform is not necessarily doom to failure. Therefore, for those lead a successful reform that finally proves to be beneficial and accepted by majority, their reputation would be regained and even more highly than the time before their reform. Deng Xiaoping ,the reform leader of China' opening policy, could serve the good example. He is now highly esteemed by Chinese government and ordinary people, although when the reform was firstly carried out , he was considered as extreme rightist by most of Chinese communists.
Is it not true that interests of reformers could also change consequently with the process of reform?

To sum up, reform is a real task that only those who have the courage to take their interests at risk could assume. Nevertheless, if the reform succeeds, the  reward to the reformers are also significant indeed.

鬼谷子UID: 159645

首先要说，请wicwawa同学注意发贴格式，在我的签名档里面有的
然后要说，谢谢你对我的信任，不过版主时间毕竟有限的，何不试试和别人结队互改呢？
下面是跟你同时间考试的同学：
3月28日 dot699699成都
3月28日 G猫 y1203@hotmail.com
3月28日 ldmmic2100 济南
3月28日 zhoulin00001 北京 QQ 84682624
3月28日 蓝清 QQ375490689 janneyzhou2004@yahoo.com.cn
3月28日 zygadene 武汉
3月28日 nopainsnogains 北京
3月28号 smileofqnd武汉,上午8:30省教育考试院一楼
3月28日 wliang北京鼎均

这有一篇wliang的还没人改过的https://bbs.gter.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=252424
你可以看看，你们互改一下

wicwawaUID: 199056

多谢斑竹，我一时兴奋忘了写题号了

dot699699UID: 175798

我是在WORD上改的，结果颜色都没了，不是很好看修改的地方，要不你什么时候上网我再传你一次，dot699699@hotmail.com
QQ7098566


No.1 鬼谷子 我欠砖 留连接
3。28决战南大，寻砖友
Reform is seldom brought about by people who are concerned with their own reputation and social standing. Those who are really in earnest about reforming a government, an educational system, or any other institution must be willing to be viewed with disdain by the rest of the world.

Are reforms always brought by those who are devoted in reforming and not concerned with their own interests, such as reputation and states quo? As my point of view, a truly 用形容词and thoroughly reform really need a leader who is earnest in（the reform itself我觉得用热心reforming a government, an educational system, or any other institution比较好，这里用REFORM ITSELF感觉象为了做一个事情而做一个事情，而不是为了一个结果做一个事情。PS：这个题目个人认为是说一个人是为了自己利益这个结果还是促进社会这个结果而进行改革）. However, it may not be true that reformers would always ruin reputation and social standing as a result of reform.这句话感觉跑题了。题目讨论的是个人能接受被误解而不是肯定要被误解

To begin with, any one who want to conduct reform truly need to get a preparation of attacks and also resistance from the society, since the nature of reform is doomED to be distain by a certain group of people. Reform is the way to change the status quo to some extent and more or less impairs不要S some people's vested interests as it is conducted. It is also true that no one would prefer to give up their own social standing, privilege and also economic advantages. Thus, by the time the reform is brought out, these people would definitely stand out as the primary resistance to reform and try every effort to demonstrate the reform brings more disadvantages than the possible benefits. Moreover, the reformer would also be these resistance 's targets which could further calumniate the reform and mislead the majority whichWHO are in neutral position. In history, as we could perceive, when Copernicus publish his theory of Heliotropism, the Roman Papacy turnED their abuse on him and also disabuseD him as A heresy. Therefore, as the example illustrated, reformers of any field should be ready ofTO attackS from particular groups.

Further, people who are only concerned with their own reputation ,generally speaking, could not conduct a reform, at least a thoroughly and effective one. These kindS of people would hesitate whether to continue when their own interests are at stake, since their objective is not TO reform to benefit the society, but to reform to maintain OR GAIN THEIR reputation。 or gain reputation删. However这里用这个词不好，什么意思？, AS IT IS KNOWN TO ALL/IN COMMON SENSE， every reform involves the situation of ruining of social standing and reputation of reformers, at least in the beginning of reform. Take the Qin Dynasty of China as example. The government in the later nineteenth century did claim for a reform in order to keep up with the world trend. But， in fact, their only objective iswas  to maintain their dominating position and just utilized a few superficial measures which were still far behind the times.(far away from the usual way of western world.西方又不一定好) Finally, the mass overturnED the government and began the real reform of China.
Thus,这个词用这里不合适 the evidence surely换个词 demonstrated/S my assertion that only not concerning with own' sake, could the reformer achieve success.

这段我觉得不该写，就是对你的中心不是很必要，我就不看了^_* In addition, I should admit that reformers does not always lead to a situation of declination in reputation and social standing. The reform is largely a redistribution of interests in certain perspective, and the reform is not necessarily doom to failure. Therefore, for those lead a successful reform that finally proves to be beneficial and accepted by majority, their reputation would be regained and even more highly than the time before their reform. Deng Xiaoping ,the reform leader of China' opening policy, could serve the good example. He is now highly esteemed by Chinese government and ordinary people, although when the reform was firstly carried out , he was considered as extreme rightist by most of Chinese communists.
Is it not true that interests of reformers could also change consequently with the process of reform?

To sum up, reform is a real task that only those who have the courage to risk (take删) their interests （at risk删） could assume. Nevertheless, if the reform succeeds, the reward to the reformers are also significant indeed.

wicwawaUID: 199056

我觉得这种题要是扣的太紧写不出三段又平衡的观点啊
孙远的提纲里发散思维的很多啊
真头疼。