ISSUE 38 书本和电视，欢迎砖头

comingsoonUID: 175137

Issue38  让砖头来得更猛烈些吧！
------摘要------
作者：comingsoon     共用时间：44分29秒     437 words  感觉好像有点走题了，大家帮看看
从2005年2月13日10时5分到2005年2月13日10时44分
------题目------
In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books.
------正文------
Due to the prevalence of TV to ordinary families, many people tend to think that they can learn as much knowledge by watching television as they can by reading books. Personally, I strongly disagree with this assertion since reading books is still a primary way to absorb knowledge and it has many disadvantages over TV.

To begin with, reading books is more efficient and more systematically in the process of gaining knowledge than is TV. On the one hand, since the purpose of the television is to profit, they has to cater the average need of the majority of people and thus these TV programs may be too easy and superfical to fit for some talented persons. That is to say, tv programs is not proper enough due to their popular attribution and not efficient. But things could be different when we refer to books. People can learn in their distinct speed and way according to their level of understanding and absorbing knowledge and would not be limited by any restriction as may provided by TV programs. On the other hand, it is impossible and dispensable for TV programs to include all the contents and specifics because of the enormous cost which is undoubtedly cost-efficient. Therefore, watching TV programs can not serves as the primarily way for someone who wants to make a systematical understanding of some kind of knowledge. But if we read books, we can get a full-scale comprehension of the knowledge through carefully perusing every necessary and imperative detail in the book. In other words, books is a better approach if we desire to learn something systmatically and comprehensively.

Furthermore, reading books is also more beneficial to us than TV when we refer to some kind of science such as philosophy, physics, mathematic and so forth. Take physics for example. What the TV programs convey is just some introduction and ostensible knowledge in that field, and they are undoubtedly not appropriate for further study. We can not learn quantum theory and the theory of relativity from TV while we can learn step by step through professional guidance books in the professional field of science.

What is more, books is a good way to review easily what we have learn and thus can solidify our knowledge system. From another point of view, it is impossible for us to review through TV unless it rebroadcast.

To sum up, though TV has some effect to for guidance, books is still a primarily way to attain knowledge since they have provided many unsurpassable advantages over TV and from books people can learn more than does TV.

medwinUID: 189909

Due to the prevalence of TV to ordinary families, many people tend to think that they can learn as much knowledge by watching television as they can by reading books. Personally, I strongly disagree with this assertion since reading books is still a primary way to absorb knowledge and it has many disadvantages over TV.

To begin with, reading books is more efficient and more systematically in the process of gaining knowledge than is 可以不用这个is TV. On the one hand, since the purpose of the television is to profit, they 这个they指代不明，可用TV stations has have to cater the average need of the majority of people and thus these TV programs may be too easy and superfical superficial to fit for some talented persons. That is to say 可以不用to say, tv大写 programs is not proper enough due to their popular attribution and not efficient. But things could be different when we refer to books. People can learn in一般用at speed their distinct speed and way according to their level of understanding and absorbing knowledge and would not be limited by any restriction as may be provided by TV programs. On the other hand, it is impossible and dispensable for TV programs to include all the contents and specifics because of the enormous cost which is undoubtedly cost-efficient. Therefore, watching TV programs can not serves as the primarily way for someone who wants to make a systematical understanding of some kind of knowledge. But if we read books, we can get a full-scale comprehension of the knowledge through carefully perusing every necessary and imperative detail in the book. In other words, reading books is a better approach if we desire to learn something systmatically and comprehensively.

Furthermore, reading books is also more beneficial to us than TV when we refer to some kind of science such as philosophy, physics, mathematic and so forth. Take physics for example. What the TV programs convey is just some introduction and ostensible这个词不太好，这个表面带有表里不一、虚假的意思 knowledge in that field, and they are undoubtedly not appropriate for further study. We can not learn quantum theory and the theory of relativity from TV while we can learn step by step through professional guidance books in the professional field of science.

What is more, books is a good way to review easily what we have learn and thus can solidify our knowledge system. From another point of view, it is impossible for us to review through TV unless it rebroadcast.这一段略显单薄

To sum up, though TV has some effect to for guidance这一点前文并没有提道啊, books is still a primarily way to attain knowledge since they have provided many unsurpassable advantages over TV and from books people can learn more than does 改为from TV.

表达还是很清楚的。不过我觉得B1和B2说的其实是一个意思，即书本更深入，更系统，只不过B2具体到某些领域。而且三个body长短相差明显，B1太长。不妨在B1中论述电视的不利，而在B2中论述书本的好处，这样这两个body既写的同一个意思，又不显重复。B3应该深入去讲，两句话肯定不够insightful。总结段中做了一个让步，说虽然电视有些作用，但是既然全文一边倒的写书的好处，这样让步不合适，除非前面加一个body，写admittedly，电视有些好处。

comingsoonUID: 175137

谢谢楼上的，只不过因为我是限时，而且速度又慢，好多东西都没有考虑好。sigh...

yiyi2005UID: 192894

Due to the prevalence of TV to ordinary families, many people tend to think that they can learn as much knowledge by watching television as they can by reading books. Personally, I strongly disagree with this assertion since reading books is still a primary way to absorb knowledge and it has many disadvantagesadvantage over TV.

To begin with, reading books is more efficient and more systematicallysystematical in the process of gaining knowledge than isdelet is TV. On the one hand, since the purpose of the televisiontelevision program is to profit, they has to caterto the average need of the majority of people and thus these TV programs may be too easydelete easy and superfical to fitdelet "to fit" for some talented persons. That is to say, tv programs is not proper enough due to their popular attribution and not efficientinefficiency. But things could be different when we refer to books. People can learn in their distinct speed and way according to their level of understanding and absorbing knowledge and would not be limited by any restriction as may provided by TV programs. On the other hand, it is impossible and dispensable for TV programs to include all the contents and specifics because of the enormous cost which is undoubtedly cost-efficient. Therefore, watching TV programs can not serves as the primarilyprimary way for someone who wants to make a systematical understanding of some kind of knowledge. But if we read books, we can get a full-scale comprehension of the knowledge through carefully perusing every necessary and imperative detail in the book. In other words, books is a better approach if we desire to learn something systmatically and comprehensively.

Furthermore, reading books is also more beneficial to us than TV when we refer to some kind of sciencesciences such as philosophy, physics, mathematic and so forth. Take physics for example. What the TV programs convey is just some introduction and ostensible knowledge in that fielddelet "in that field", and they are undoubtedly not appropriate for further study. We can not learn quantum theory and the theory of relativity from TV while we can learn step by step through professional guidance books in the professional field of science.

What is more, books is a good way to review easily what we have learn and thus can solidify our knowledge system. From another point of view, it is impossible for us to review through TV unless it rebroadcast.

To sum up, though TV has some effect to for guidance,这句话没看懂 books is still a primarily way to attain knowledge since they have provided many unsurpassable advantages over TV and from books. people can learn more than doesdelet "does" +from TV
body2 和  body3似乎单薄了些,同意二楼的建议
楼主我们好象同一天考,能结个组吗?我3,23

comingsoonUID: 175137

好啊，我是4.1考，不过也差不了几天。

xiongyicnUID: 192745

Issue38 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧！
------摘要------
作者：comingsoon 共用时间：44分29秒 437 words 感觉好像有点走题了，大家帮看看
从2005年2月13日10时5分到2005年2月13日10时44分
------题目------
In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books.
------正文------
Due to the prevalence of TV to ordinary families, many people tend to think that they can learn as much knowledge by watching television as they can by reading books. Personally, I strongly disagree with this assertion since reading books is still a primary way to absorb knowledge and it has many disadvantages advantagesover TV.

To begin with, reading books is more efficient and more systematically in the process of gaining knowledge than is TV. On the one hand, since the purpose of the television is to profit, they has to cater the average need of the majority of people and thus these TV programs may be too easy and superfical to fit for some talented persons. That is to say, tv programs isare not proper enough due to their popular attribution and not efficient. But things could be different when we refer to books. People can learn in their distinct speed and way according to their level of understanding and absorbing knowledge and would not be limited by any restriction as may provided by TV programs. On the other hand, it is impossible and dispensable for TV programs to include all the contents and specifics because of the enormous cost which is undoubtedly cost-efficient. Therefore, watching TV programs can not serves as the primarily way for someone who wants to make a systematical understanding of some kind of knowledge. But if we read books, we can get a full-scale comprehension of the knowledge through carefully perusing every necessary and imperative detail in the book. In other words, booksreading books  is a better approach if we desire to learn something systmatically and comprehensively.

Furthermore, reading books is also more beneficial to us than TV when we refer to some kind of science such as philosophy, physics, mathematic and so forth. Take physics for example. What the TV programs convey is just some introduction and ostensible knowledge in that field, and they are undoubtedly not appropriate for further study. We can not learn quantum theory and the theory of relativity from TV while we can learn step by step through professional guidance books in the professional field of science.
其实这一段和上一段讲的查不错,只是这里细化了
What is more, books is a good way to review easily what we have learn and thus can solidify our knowledge system. From another point of view, it is impossible for us to review through TV unless it rebroadcast.

To sum up, though TV has some effect to for guidance, books is still a primarily way to attain knowledge since they have provided many unsurpassable advantages over TV and from books people can learn more than does TV.