- 最后登录
- 2006-11-6
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 1197
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-1-27
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 619
- UID
- 193720
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 1197
- 注册时间
- 2005-1-27
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 0
|
53"College and university education should be free for all students, fully financed by the government."
_____________________________________________________________
In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to a fierce competition in the educational field, [人家ETS的范文句子,用了未必保险啊!]more and more people focus their attentions on the fact that a lot of adolescents although study very well can still not go to the colleges or universities for the further education since they can not pay for [afford]the marvelous tuition. Therefore, some socialists suggest that the education in colleges and universities should be free for all students fully financed by the government. The statement looks very reasonable for the first thought, but I could not agree with it after more considerations.
Admittedly, the colleges and universities are the places where people can get knowledge, and the more knowledge people have, the more developed the country will be in future. This method surely have many benefits, but this is not to say that I support the plan, because I think the execution of this plan would be very hard, and at that time many problems which have not been noticed by us would surely be exposed to the society.
As is known to all, the government's finance mostly comes from the tax. In our [人家可不是和你一个国家的哦!^_^]country, there were [为什么用were?] hundreds of thousands people who go to the college or university each year, and the average cost of one person per year is about 5600 RMB without the fee of apartment taken into account. [without taking their rents into account] If the plan had been executed, the number of the people attended the college or university would increase, and the revenue had to increase obviously. However, can this reality be accepted by lots of people who do not want to go to the colleges? The complaining free press will be never disappeared for a long time, and a cost which is self-decided will be forcibly distributed to all the people all over the country. [怎么觉得这么绕啊?看了好半天才明白过来]Some of people, who are poverty without students, [是想说没有孩子要上学的穷人么?可以这么说?]will have more difficulties to live. Does the fact just we want to see? [是不是有了政府的资助学校的学生就多了?这个不一定吧,呵呵用了阿狗的思路了.只能说政府的支出多了,所以税收要增加,而不是说学生多了导致的支出多了]
In addition, the colleges and universities are [mediums that]only providing [provide]a good environment for the students to study. That is not to say [第二次出现了] people can not get knowledge without them. Take Bill Gates for example. He had the chance to study in one of the best universities in the US. Although giving up the chance, he still gets much knowledge by himself from the books, friends, society, and so forth. I want to tell the people both who are in the colleges or universities and who are in the society now, that what we need more is not the environment where it is easy for us to study, but the desire to get the knowledge. If you have this right and healthy attitude, you can study anytime at anywhere regardless the environment. Just as the Confucius said thousand years ago, there must be a person in three who can be my teacher. [这个是谁翻译的?老外懂么?][/color ]The field of knowledge is very broad, and any new things we had known, may help us a lot in the future, regardless the knowledge where you study. [这段好象是要说我们不需要一定在大学中学习,所以政府并不需要对学生进行财政支持,因为他们在社会中同样可以进行学习.但是觉得你没有focus on the issue,说到最后给人感觉是你在说另外的一个问题,象是环境对我们学习的影响之类的.觉得最后在加一点扣下题目会好一些.]
Hence, I do not agree with the speaker’s statement for the reason that although the chance to study in the college or university is very helpful, we can still get much knowledge in other circumstance if you have the right attitude about studying, and it is too hard for the execution with the consideration of the cost.
我也是菜鸟,不过要考试了.
以上意见仅供参考,不要过于相信我的感觉.
欢迎交流,呵呵.^_^ |
|