issue87 [color=#0000ff]修改版，改过的同学来瞄一眼，没改过的更加欢迎

龙非UID: 193190

－－题目－－
In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries.
－－正文－－
Is the beginner more possible than the expert to make crucial discoveries in any field of inquiry? The speaker believes so, and I tend to agree.

To begin with, the greenhorn is more likely than the maven to make significant discoveries for his being less constrained by experience. When encountering new discoveries, attitude of the expert and the beginner is completely different. The expert with abundant experience tends to seek a new solution base on the old one while the tyros with little experience will try all approaches no matter new or old to resolve the question. Obviously, the beginner will have a broader view towards discoveries and more conceivable to make contributions. For supporting examples we need look no further than Lawrence Bragg and his father Henry Bragg, who both won the 1915 Nobel Prize. When Henry Bragg, a famous physicist, tried to explain the X radial diffraction phenomenon with his past experience, he slammed into dead end. While his son Lawrence Bragg, a young and inexperience scientist succeeded to do it from a different angle. Lawrence Bragg's success thanked to being without prejudice born from experience and therefore could ponder the problem from different aspects. That is to say, the beginner is less restricted by convention and more apt to make import discoveries than the expert.

Moreover, retrospecting the scientific history, we can find that most significant discoveries are made by the scientists when they are tyros. The three most weighty discoveries in twentieth centuries which are Einstein's Relative Theory, Heisenberg's Quantum Mechanics and Watson's spiral model for the molecular structure of DNA are all discovered when the scientists started to explore the science arcanum before long. In addition, most scientists won the Nobel Prize due to their contributions made when they are beginners. For example, Niels Bohr, the 1922 Nobel Prize winner, made his most important discoveries in 1913 when he just began to work in the University of Cambridge. And M ssbauer won a 1961 Nobel Prize for his doctoral paper. By summarizing the historical rule, we can get the conclusion that the beginner is more likely to make significant achievement than the expert.

Admittedly, the expert has full experience and knowledge which are also important to science and there are many experts who have made great contributions to science. Einstein, for instance, discovered the general theory of relativity, inaugurated the modern cosmography and made other significant discoveries when he was already a famous physical scientist. However, the most contributions in his life were done when he was a technician of a patent bureau.

In sum, form the discuss above, we can draw a conclusion that although the expert has full experience and knowledge, the beginner is more possible to make crucial discoveries than the expert.

mondiaUID: 193825

正好我昨天也写了这篇，过来切磋一下


No.1 issue87 修改版，改过的同学来瞄一眼，没改过的更加欢迎
－－题目－－
In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries.
－－正文－－
Is the beginner more possible than the expert to make crucial discoveries in any field of inquiry? The speaker believes so, and I tend to agree.好简洁

To begin with, the greenhorn顺便请教一下，表达新手tyro之类的都可以么？有没有正规的问题。 is more likely than the maven同上，金山怎么说是"美口" to make significant discoveries for his being less constrained by experience. When encountering new discoveries这儿是不是该用problems?, attitude of the expert and the beginner is completely different. The expert with abundant experience tends to seek a new solution base on the old oneones? while the tyros with little experience will try all approaches no matter new or old to resolve the question. Obviously, the beginner will have a broader view 这不敢同意towards discoveries and more conceivable to make contributions. For supporting examples we need look no further than Lawrence Bragg and his father Henry Bragg, who both won the 1915 Nobel Prize. When Henry Bragg, a famous physicist, tried to explain the X radial diffraction phenomenon with his past experience, he slammed into dead end. While his son Lawrence Bragg, a young and inexperience 吹毛求疵一下，确实没什么经验么？不太了解scientist succeeded to do it from a different angle. Lawrence Bragg's success thanked to being without prejudice born from experience and therefore could ponder the problem from different aspects. That is to say, the beginner is less restricted by convention and more apt to make import discoveries than the expert.

Moreover, retrospecting the scientific history, we can find that most significant discoveries are made by the scientists when they are tyros. The three most weighty discoveries in twentieth centuries which are Einstein's Relative Theory, Heisenberg's Quantum Mechanics and Watson's spiral model for the molecular structure of DNA are all discovered when the scientists started to explore the science arcanum before long.还是爱因斯坦，狭义相对论：据说他很小就开始思考跟光赛跑的事了，后来又在专利局想了很久；广义相对论，被认为是他更原创更深刻的杰作，则更始成为一代大师之后的事了；另外两个的轶事就不了解了 In addition, most scientists won the Nobel Prize due to their contributions made when they are beginners. For example, Niels Bohr, the 1922 Nobel Prize winner, made his most important discoveries in 1913 when he just began to work in the University of Cambridge. And M ssbauer ?谁，也是物理学家？won a 1961 Nobel Prize for his doctoral paper. By summarizing the historical rule, we can get the conclusion that the beginner is more likely to make significant achievement than the expert. 感觉就在说"物理"一家的事，大家的定式似的，我也这样，尽管学数学的

Admittedly, the expert has full experience and knowledge which are also important to science and there are many experts who have made great contributions to science. Einstein, for instance, discovered the general theory of relativity, inaugurated the modern cosmography and made other significant discoveries when he was already a famous physical scientist. However, the most contributions in his life were done when he was a technician of a patent bureau.
我觉得这跟牛顿回家一样，属于高手的闭关，一出来就是牛人了，
当然，其中的努力和蜕变是我们难以想象的；所以是不是新手阶段干的，值得商榷

In sum, form the discuss above, we can draw a conclusion that although the expert has full experience and knowledge, the beginner is more possible to make crucial discoveries than the expert.

大言不惭一番：
毛爷爷说你的文章："麻雀虽小，五脏俱全"；
语言上自己也没什么把握，不感妄加指摘；
限时的话，应该不错了吧，至少我认为；我的限时…不忍再读的 :(

boyjimUID: 125249

Is the beginner more possible than the expert to make crucial discoveries in any field of inquiry? The speaker believes so, and I tend to agree.开头简洁

To begin with, the greenhorn is more likely than the maven这两个词换得好 to make significant discoveries for his being less constrained by experience. When encountering new discoveries, attitude of the expert and the beginner is completely different. The expert with abundant experience tends to seek a new solution base on the old one while the tyros八错八错 with little experience will try all approaches no matter new or old to resolve the question.既然没有太多经验，如何知道新旧方法呢？ Obviously, the beginner will have a broader view towards discoveries and more conceivable to make contributions. For supporting examples we need look no further than Lawrence Bragg and his father Henry Bragg, who both won the 1915 Nobel Prize. When Henry Bragg, a famous physicist, tried to explain the X radial diffraction phenomenon with his past experience, he slammed into dead end虽然我知道你什么意思，最好不要这么表达吧~google搜索只有一条记录，加拿大的一条八六年文献上面的记录. While his son Lawrence Bragg, a young and inexperience你怎么知道他没有经验？ scientist succeeded to do it from a different angle用dimension. Lawrence Bragg's success thanked to being without prejudice born from experience and therefore could ponder the problem from different aspects. That is to say, the beginner is less restricted by convention and more apt to make import discoveries than the expert.不给新手老手定义，直接写，有危险，但是不会太多的自相矛盾

Moreover, retrospecting the scientific history, we can find that most significant discoveries are made by the scientists when they are tyros. The three most weighty不是“重”是重要,而且，这个weighty discovery好像是一个专有名词 discoveries in twentieth centuries which are Einstein's Relative Theory, Heisenberg's Quantum Mechanics and Watson's spiral model for the molecular structure of DNA are all discovered when the scientists started to explore the science arcanum before long. In addition, most scientists won the Nobel Prize due to their contributions made when they are beginners. For example, Niels Bohr, the 1922 Nobel Prize winner, made his most important discoveries in 1913 when he just began to work in the University of Cambridge. And M ssbauer won a 1961 Nobel Prize for his doctoral paper. By summarizing the historical rule, we can get the conclusion that the beginner is more likely to make significant achievement than the expert. 大段的举例~内容翔实~不过这些例子，不是那么容易记得住哦

Admittedly, the expert has full experience and knowledge which are also important to science and there are many experts who have made great contributions to science. Einstein, for instance, discovered the general theory of relativity, inauguratedExcellent the modern cosmography and made other significant discoveries when he was already a famous physical scientist. However,ironically the most contributions in his life were done when he was a technician of a patent bureau.

In sum, form the discuss above, we can draw a conclusion that although the expert has full experience and knowledge, the beginner is more possible to make crucial discoveries than the expert.用词注意了！结构也渐趋合理，或许我们始终也不能够做到尽善尽美，不过按照ETS弱智标准~有5分了起码

mondiaUID: 193825

来拍第一块砖吧。。 :(
我的87
难道太长了，成了"裹脚布"?!
https://bbs.gter.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=256720


144
https://bbs.gter.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=256120