argument11 4月group4

billkaoUID: 9349

Argument11  @ 3.21
----------------
没有限时  419字
------题目------
The following appeared in a memo from the mayor of the town of West Egg.
'Two years ago, our consultants predicted that West Egg's landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, would be completely filled within five years. During the past two years, however, town residents have been recycling twice as much aluminum and paper as they did in previous years. Next month the amount of material recycled should further increase, since charges for garbage pickup will double. Furthermore, over ninety percent of the respondents to a recent survey said that they would do more recycling in the future. Because of our residents' strong commitment to recycling, the available space in our landfill should last for considerably longer than predicted.
------正文------
Thanks to the strong commitment of citizens in West Egg, the mayor considered the landfill there would certainly not be filled up within three years form now on. But before overthrowing the prediction made by the city's consultants two years ago, the reasons stated in the argument should be examined form several other perspectives.

First of all, we cannot tell the future simply form the past. The arguer assumed that residents of West Egg would keep reducing the load of their landfill according to their achievement in recycling aluminum and paper during the last two years. The fact, however, is that aluminum and paper is a small sort of the whole home wastes. That is to say, we do not know recycling situations of other garbage sorts, such as empty bottles and cans, used furniture and other home appliances, and many plastic materials, which are all necessary in an accurate predicting.  

Furthermore, the double charges of garbage pickup from next month might not be so effective that could greatly ensure the huge drop of wastes in landfill.  If the cast of pickup is quite small at first, most people will ignore the little increase when they dealing with the matter of wastes. Even the fee is somewhat expensive, citizens will also do as they used to because of the basic life needs.

Also, the survey in this argument is too limited to be convictive as well. The memo says nothing about the other citizens besides the most respondents of that survey, so it therefore cannot draw a conclusion that all residents will do more recycling in the future. Perhaps the receivers of the survey are those who all received higher education, or perhaps the respondents who might be all in the same age bracket, or of the same location in the city. The point is, a hasty generalization about the whole residents cannot be made from the vague survey. This survey failed to cover a board cross-section of the population. So the result seems questionable.

Even if the whole citizens of West Egg will all do more recycling according to the lame results shown in the survey, the landfill might also be completely filled as three years' time goes by because the arguer made his conclusion without taking the other garbage sources into account. The industry, for instance, generates various wastes. The construction in the city would also bring all kinds of garbage too. The argument who only thinks of the condition of residents' daily lives can hardly stand.

zhengandhong135UID: 164542

Thanks to the strong commitment of citizens in West Egg, the mayor considered the landfill there would certainly not be filled up within three years form now on. But before overthrowing the prediction made by the city's consultants two years ago, the reasons stated in the argument should be examined form several other perspectives.

First of all, we cannot tell the future simply formfrom the past. The arguer assumed that residents of West Egg would keep reducing the load of their landfill according to their achievement in recycling aluminum and paper during the last two years. The fact, however, is that aluminum and paper is a small sortpart of the whole home wastes. That is to say, we do not know recycling situations of other garbage sorts, 不知道其他得情况怎么知道铝是少部分,前后矛盾啊such as empty bottles and cans, used furniture and other home appliances, and many plastic materials, which are all necessary in an accurate predicting.

Furthermore, the double charges of garbage pickup from next month might not be so effective that could greatly ensure the huge drop of wastes in landfill. If the cast of pickup is quite small at first, most people will ignore the little increase when they dealingdeal with the matter of wastes. Even the fee is somewhat expensive, citizens will also do as they used to because of the basic life needs.

Also, the survey in this argument is too limited to be convictive as well. The memo says nothing about the other citizens besides the most respondents of that survey, so it therefore cannot draw a conclusion that all residents will do more recycling in the future. Perhaps the receivers of the survey are those who all received higher education, or perhaps the respondents who might be all in the same age bracket, or of the same location in the city. The point is, a hasty generalization about the whole residents cannot be made from the vague survey. This survey failed to cover a board cross-section of the population. So the result seems questionable.

Even if the whole citizens of West Egg will all do more recycling according to the lame results shown in the survey, the landfill might also be completely filled as three years' time goes by because the arguer made his conclusion without taking the other garbage sources into account. The industry, for instance, generates various wastes. The construction in the city would also bring all kinds of garbage too. The argument who only thinks of the condition of residents' daily lives can hardly stand.

文章真的不错,按候哥写得吧,难挑错误

zhengandhong135UID: 164542

留个连接
https://bbs.gter.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=257738
https://bbs.gter.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=257740

athiferUID: 199136

Thanks to the strong commitment of citizens in West Egg, the mayor considered the landfill there would certainly not be filled up within three years form now on. But before overthrowing the prediction made by the city's consultants two years ago, the reasons stated in the argument should be examined form several other perspectives.

First of all, we cannot tell the future simply form color=bluefrom/color the past. The arguer assumed that residents of West Egg would keep reducing the load of their landfill according to their achievement in recycling aluminum and paper during the last two years. The fact, however, is that aluminum and paper is a small sort color=bluepart/color of the whole home wastes. That is to say, we do not know recycling situations of other garbage sorts, such as empty bottles and cans, used furniture and other home appliances, and many plastic materials, which are all necessary in color=blue?for/color an accurate predicting.

Furthermore, the double charges of garbage pickup from next month might not be so effective that could greatly ensure color=bluereduce/color the huge drop of wastes in landfill. If the cast of pickup is quite small at first, most people will ignore the little increase when color=bluethey去掉/color dealing with the matter of wastes. Even the fee is somewhat expensive, citizens will color=blue用might吧，will显得太确定了/color also do as they used to because of the basic life needs.

Also, the survey in this argument is too limited to be convictive as well. The memo says nothing about the other citizens besides the most respondents of that survey, so it therefore cannot draw a conclusion that all residents will do more recycling in the future. Perhaps the receivers of the survey are those who all received higher education, or perhaps the respondents who might be all in the same age bracket, or of the same location in the city. The point is, a hasty generalization about the whole residents cannot be made from the vague survey. color=blueIt is highly possible that/color the survey failed to cover a board cross-section of the population. So the result seems questionable.

Even if the whole citizens of West Egg will all do more recycling according to the lame results shown in the survey, the landfill might also be completely filled as three years' time goes by because the arguer made his conclusion without taking color=bluethe去掉/color other garbage sources into account. The industry, for instance, generates various wastes. The construction in the city would also bring all kinds of garbage too. The argument who only thinks of the condition of residents' daily lives can hardly stand.

逻辑错误没有放过，表述也不错，读起来很舒服，向你学习
可以帮我改下作文吗

athiferUID: 199136

Thanks to the strong commitment of citizens in West Egg, the mayor considered the landfill there would certainly not be filled up within three years form now on. But before overthrowing the prediction made by the city's consultants two years ago, the reasons stated in the argument should be examined form several other perspectives.

First of all, we cannot tell the future simply form from the past. The arguer assumed that residents of West Egg would keep reducing the load of their landfill according to their achievement in recycling aluminum and paper during the last two years. The fact, however, is that aluminum and paper is a small sort part of the whole home wastes. That is to say, we do not know recycling situations of other garbage sorts, such as empty bottles and cans, used furniture and other home appliances, and many plastic materials, which are all necessary in ?for an accurate predicting.

Furthermore, the double charges of garbage pickup from next month might not be so effective that could greatly ensure reduce the huge drop of wastes in landfill. If the cast of pickup is quite small at first, most people will ignore the little increase when they去掉 dealing with the matter of wastes. Even the fee is somewhat expensive, citizens will 用might吧，will显得太确定了 also do as they used to because of the basic life needs.

Also, the survey in this argument is too limited to be convictive as well. The memo says nothing about the other citizens besides the most respondents of that survey, so it therefore cannot draw a conclusion that all residents will do more recycling in the future. Perhaps the receivers of the survey are those who all received higher education, or perhaps the respondents who might be all in the same age bracket, or of the same location in the city. The point is, a hasty generalization about the whole residents cannot be made from the vague survey. It is highly possible that the survey failed to cover a board cross-section of the population. So the result seems questionable.

Even if the whole citizens of West Egg will all do more recycling according to the lame results shown in the survey, the landfill might also be completely filled as three years' time goes by because the arguer made his conclusion without taking the去掉 other garbage sources into account. The industry, for instance, generates various wastes. The construction in the city would also bring all kinds of garbage too. The argument who only thinks of the condition of residents' daily lives can hardly stand.

逻辑错误没有放过，表述也不错，读起来很舒服，向你学习
可以帮我改下作文吗