argu42, 快考了,新手多学习,高手来帮忙拍呀

zhengandhong135UID: 164542

In this argument, the author concludes that we too should begin to promote ecotourism and hire the current director of Bellegea's Natinal Toursim Office as a consultant for the campaign. The conclusion seems valid, and the argument looks reasoning and convincing, however, a further investigation will find how they are groundless.

First of all, the premise of the conclusion is insufficient to support the conclusion. The arguer did not provide any data to prove that promotion of ecotourism which is suitable for Bellegea is suitable for Paraterra as well. Common sense tells us that those areas full of natural resources such as mountains, rivers, and various plants and so on, are more likely to attract tourists. Maybe in Bellegea there are lots of natural resources and weather conditions there are also very satisfied. On the contrary, the natural conditions in Paraterra are seldom mentioned.

Furthermore, the evidences of the argument are unpersuasive. For on thing, it claims that this year the number of foreign visitors arriving at Bellegea's main airport doubled. But no more proof is cited to tell us that those people who arrived at the airport were all tourists rather than those who had other intentions. For example, they came here to visit their relatives. For another, the fact that per capita in Bellegea increased by ten percent is too vaguer to support the conclusion that it is the ecotourism that contributes to the increase. Perhaps, the rise of the income is mainly due to other factors like the improvement of industry.

Finally, the conclusion is unwarranted. Although the current director of Bellegea's National Tourism Office did well in Bellegea, we could not ensure that he would suit to the position of consultant in Paraterra. It is possible that he did not know the situation in Paraterra at all. In addition, different country has different policy, which will influence the efficiency of the director taking measures too.

To sum up, the reasoning behind whether to promote ecotourism and employ the director of Bellegea seems logical as presented above. Therefore, the government of Paraterra should evaluate all possible cases and causes to make a final decision.

zhengandhong135UID: 164542

这是题目
The following appeared in a proposal from the economic minister of the country of Paraterra.
'In order to strengthen its lagging economy, last year the government of the nearby country of Bellegea began an advertising campaign to promote ecologically sound tourism (ecotourism). This year the number of foreign visitors arriving at Bellegea's main airport doubled, and per capita income in Bellegea increased by ten percent. To provide more income for the population of Paraterra and also preserve the natural environment of our tiny country, we too should begin to promote ecotourism. To ensure that our advertising campaign is successful, we should hire the current director of Bellegea's National Tourism Office as a consultant for the campaign.'

zhoulin00001UID: 189304

In this argument, the author concludes that we too should begin to promote ecotourism and hire the current director of Bellegea's Natinal Toursim Office as a consultant for the campaign. The conclusion seems valid, and the argument looks reasoning and convincing, however, a further investigation will find how they are groundless.[开头不错，简洁]

First of all, the premise of the conclusion is insufficient to support the conclusion. The arguer did not provide any data to prove that promotion of ecotourism which is suitable for Bellegea is suitable for Paraterra as well. Common sense tells us that those areas full of natural resources such as mountains, rivers, and various plants and so on, are more likely to attract tourists. Maybe in Bellegea there are lots of natural resources and weather conditions there are also very satisfied. On the contrary, the natural conditions in Paraterra are seldom mentioned.

Furthermore, the evidences of the argument are unpersuasive. For on thing, it claims that this year the number of foreign visitors arriving at Bellegea's main airport doubled. But no more proof is cited to tell us that those people who arrived at the airport were all tourists rather than those who had other intentions. For example, they came here to visit their relatives. For another, the fact that per capita in Bellegea increased by ten percent is too vaguer to support the conclusion that it is the ecotourism that contributes to the increase. Perhaps, the rise of the income is mainly due to other factors like the improvement of industry.

Finally, the conclusion is unwarranted. Although the current director of Bellegea's National Tourism Office did well in Bellegea, we could not ensure that he would suit to the position of consultant in Paraterra. It is possible that he did not know the situation in Paraterra at all. In addition, different country has different policy, which will influence the efficiency of the director taking measures too.

To sum up, the reasoning behind whether to promote ecotourism and employ the director of Bellegea seems logical as presented above. Therefore, the government of Paraterra should evaluate all possible cases and causes to make a final decision.
[不错，比以前进步多了， 赞一个！！，提点小建议，把body1 body2互换，这样更有逻辑性]

zhengandhong135UID: 164542

多谢