Issue87 专家还是新人更容易有重要的发现？

staralwaysUID: 193479

------题目------
In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries.

------正文------
What is the role played by those beginners in the field of inquiry? When facing this question, different people will have different opinions. Some may argue that since the beginners are likely to bring some new perspectives to the particular field and thus they are likely to make important discoveries than those existing experts, while others may suggest the right opposite. However, careful reflection shows that it is the experts who are likely to bring about new findings, an answer that may disappoint some beginners.

There is no doubt that beginners play a role that are important to some extent in the field of inquiry. As newcomers, they have learned the newest theories and facts relating to their specific field, and when they come into the professional area, they bring about quite new perspectives and the current development, acting like new blood injected into old vessels and revitalize the whole field. People admit this, but over emphasis on the role of beginners should be avoided because they don't possess enough knowledge and theories about the particular field, and what's more important, long working experiences that are essential to important discoveries, the very thing that existing experts have.

Therefore, the answer to the question mentioned in the first paragraph is that expert is more likely than the beginner to make important discoveries, and in any field. In the field of natural science, those experts are likely to possess diverse theories about the area they are excel at and sometimes the whole development of a new field from birth to the present. They have devoted their time to doing research. As a result, they are more likely to maintain enough theoretical basis and have a sense of what is the right direction that towards possible findings while the beginners, may even sometimes lose themselves in facing so many different ideas and as a result cannot figure out which direction they should pursue. For example, while Einstein developed the Theory of Relativity with extensive knowledge about classic physics and its limitations and from his long period of scientific thinking, we cannot simply expect some newly graduated doctors in the field of physics can work out this theory, a big jump of physics since they lack the theoretical basis and way of thinking problems Einstein had. Similar facts could be found throughout very branches of the natural science and therefore we can reach the conclusion that experts are more likely to have surprising findings.

Besides, outside the field of the natural science, when focus is placed on the social science, the same holds true. For example, in the field of management, working experiences plays a vital role, a fortune only those experts have but rarely possessed by those beginners. When Jack Welch, the former CEO of GE, noticed that in the past work, the efficiency of management was at a low level and thus the corporation didnot show fierce competitiveness, and the reason for this was that they have not employed precise measurement in assessing their working. Inspired by this, he found a new way of managing, the famous "Six-Sigma", which led to the prosperity of the GE. Had not been his long working experience, there would be no the great contribution to the world of management. Other field like finance, the creation of new financial tools is always the great works of those experts since they know the very difference between diverse tools and thus how they can be effectively combined with each other, the knowledge gained by there working experience. However, for the beginners, whether they are familiar with so many financial tools is still a question, let alone making important discoveries. Therefore, we should expect more on those experts for new findings.

Reality has shown that there is a clear answer to the question that who is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries, the beginner or the expert? That is the expert. However, beginners should not feel frustrated by this because as long as they work hard, there will be someday when they themselves become experts in the field and they can make important contributions to the whole human race.


明天就进入四月了，离考试的时间越来越近了，真是紧张啊。最近写issue唯一值得高兴的就是时间基本上能控制住了。

staralwaysUID: 193479

顶一下。最近两天没来，翻了好几页才找到自己的帖子。

victoriazhizhiUID: 163135

seat taken.....................
明天前发上来。。。。。。。。

staralwaysUID: 193479

好啊，谢谢吱吱咧！

victoriazhizhiUID: 163135

写了不少字啊，限时了？
What is the role played by those beginners in the field of inquiry? When facing this question, different people will have different opinions. Some may argue that since the beginners are likely to bring some new perspectives to the particular field and thus they are likely to make important discoveries than those existing experts, while others may suggest the right opposite. However, careful reflection shows that it is the experts who are likely to bring about new findings, an answer that may disappoint some beginners.觉得开头那个问题问的不太好，后面探讨的好像不是这些

There is no doubt that beginners play a role that are important to some extent in the field of inquiry. As newcomers, they have learned the newest theories and facts relating to their specific field, and when they come into the professional area, they bring about quite new perspectives and the current development, acting like new blood injected into old vessels and revitalize the whole field. People admit this, but over emphasis on the role of beginners should be avoided because they don't possess enough knowledge and theories about the particular field, and what's more important, long working experiences that are essential to important discoveries, the very thing that existing experts have.转的地方有些突然了，反正这段也不长，不如都说新手的作用好了，一句刚说个新观点，然后就转走了。对发现和进步上的意义呢？新观点是干嘛的？

Therefore, the answer to the question mentioned in the first paragraph is that expert is more likely than the beginner to make important discoveries, and in any field. 看，这个answer是不是回答的开篇提出的问题？In the field of natural science, those experts are likely to possess diverse theories about the area they are excel at and sometimes the whole development of a new field from birth to the present. They have devoted their time to doing research. As a result, they are more likely to maintain enough theoretical basis and have a sense of what is the right direction that towards possible findings while the beginners, may even sometimes lose themselves in facing so many different ideas and as a result cannot figure out which direction they should pursue.这里分析不错 For example, while Einstein developed the Theory of Relativity with extensive knowledge about classic physics and its limitations and from his long period of scientific thinking, we cannot simply expect some newly graduated doctors in the field of physics can work out this theory, a big jump of physics since they lack the theoretical basis and way of thinking problems Einstein had.way of thinking的东西又不是expert才有，因人而异 Similar facts could be found throughout very branches of the natural science and similar的东西没有了…？therefore we can reach the conclusion that experts are more likely to have surprising findings.这段还不错，不过TS主意下，还有就是例子不简练，有些不能直接服务你论点的东西可以不写，结尾的reach the conclusion一看见我就想当阿狗驳斥了。。。最好还是说你这段的观点吧，经验丰富了，敏感了什么的

Besides, outside the field of the natural science, when focus is placed on the social science, the same holds true. For example, in the field of management, working experiences plays a vital role, a fortune only those experts have but rarely possessed by those beginners. When Jack Welch, the former CEO of GE, noticed that in the past work, the efficiency of management was at a low level and thus the corporation didnot show fierce competitiveness, and the reason for this was that they have not employed precise measurement in assessing their working. Inspired by this, he found a new way of managing, the famous "Six-Sigma", which led to the prosperity of the GE. Had not been his long working experience, there would be no the great contribution to the world of management. 你总是在强调成果的重要社会意义，刚那个相对论也是，注意扣题，不如说是个discovery 或者progress更实际。这些没有大作用的Other field like finance, the creation of new financial tools is always the great works of those experts since they know the very difference between diverse tools and thus how they can be effectively combined with each other, the knowledge gained by there working experience. However, for the beginners, whether they are familiar with so many financial tools is still a question, let alone making important discoveries. Therefore, we should expect more on those experts for new findings.

Reality has shown that there is a clear answer to the question that who is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries, the beginner or the expert? That is the expert. However, beginners should not feel frustrated by this because as long as they work hard, there will be someday when they themselves become experts in the field and they can make important contributions to the whole human race结尾还不错，喊口号，鼓舞人心哪，呵呵

总的说还不错的，开头的问句再想下。要探讨什么问题？是role么？B1读起来不太自然，转的太快了。还有就是例子的表达最好简练，重要在例子的分析上，与论证联系不紧密的细枝末节可以不要。加油啊

staralwaysUID: 193479

写了不少字啊，限时了？[恩，就是用那个限时工具写的，超过了一点。这两天刚开始试着用PP3，发现很不习惯，好象连思维都不连贯了。]
What is the role played by those beginners in the field of inquiry? When facing this question, different people will have different opinions. Some may argue that since the beginners are likely to bring some new perspectives to the particular field and thus they are likely to make important discoveries than those existing experts, while others may suggest the right opposite. However, careful reflection shows that it is the experts who are likely to bring about new findings, an answer that may disappoint some beginners.觉得开头那个问题问的不太好，后面探讨的好像不是这些。[实际上是写的时候想不出开头，又看着时间在走，就只能用个提问了。而且基本上是在restate了。]

There is no doubt that beginners play a role that are important to some extent in the field of inquiry. As newcomers, they have learned the newest theories and facts relating to their specific field, and when they come into the professional area, they bring about quite new perspectives and the current development, acting like new blood injected into old vessels and revitalize the whole field. People admit this, but over emphasis on the role of beginners should be avoided because they don't possess enough knowledge and theories about the particular field, and what's more important, long working experiences that are essential to important discoveries, the very thing that existing experts have.转的地方有些突然了，反正这段也不长，不如都说新手的作用好了，一句刚说个新观点，然后就转走了。对发现和进步上的意义呢？新观点是干嘛的？[想试着直接通过意思转折、过渡之类的。看样子是弄巧成拙了。新观点应该是能够给一个领域带来新的思考方式，给原本可能已经僵化在一个圈子里的研究工作注入新鲜的血液，能帮助纠正以前错误的研究方向和研究方法。我是在这段的结尾写一点内容把内容转到expert身上去好呢，还是后面一段直接来个however了事，哪个好一点啊？]

Therefore, the answer to the question mentioned in the first paragraph is that expert is more likely than the beginner to make important discoveries, and in any field. 看，这个answer是不是回答的开篇提出的问题？[我觉得应该是回答了啊。我那个问题就完完全全的按照题目的意思说的。吱吱能不再说清楚点啊。]In the field of natural science, those experts are likely to possess diverse theories about the area they are excel at and sometimes the whole development of a new field from birth to the present. They have devoted their time to doing research. As a result, they are more likely to maintain enough theoretical basis and have a sense of what is the right direction that towards possible findings while the beginners, may even sometimes lose themselves in facing so many different ideas and as a result cannot figure out which direction they should pursue.这里分析不错 For example, while Einstein developed the Theory of Relativity with extensive knowledge about classic physics and its limitations and from his long period of scientific thinking, we cannot simply expect some newly graduated doctors in the field of physics can work out this theory, a big jump of physics since they lack the theoretical basis and way of thinking problems Einstein had.way of thinking的东西又不是expert才有，因人而异 Similar facts could be found throughout very branches of the natural science and similar的东西没有了…？[吱吱的眼睛还真尖。这句话的确是没想真写，就想一笔带过，然后就把这段给结束了。]therefore we can reach the conclusion that experts are more likely to have surprising findings.这段还不错，不过TS主意下，还有就是例子不简练，有些不能直接服务你论点的东西可以不写，结尾的reach the conclusion一看见我就想当阿狗驳斥了。。。最好还是说你这段的观点吧，经验丰富了，敏感了什么的。[恩恩，这个建议收下了。毕竟issue是我们立论，别人看了就是在反驳了。]

Besides, outside the field of the natural science, when focus is placed on the social science, the same holds true. For example, in the field of management, working experiences plays a vital role, a fortune only those experts have but rarely possessed by those beginners. When Jack Welch, the former CEO of GE, noticed that in the past work, the efficiency of management was at a low level and thus the corporation didnot show fierce competitiveness, and the reason for this was that they have not employed precise measurement in assessing their working. Inspired by this, he found a new way of managing, the famous "Six-Sigma", which led to the prosperity of the GE. Had not been his long working experience, there would be no the great contribution to the world of management. 你总是在强调成果的重要社会意义，刚那个相对论也是，注意扣题，不如说是个discovery 或者progress更实际。这些没有大作用的。[我知道你的意思。我想的是题目里既然说的是important discoveries么，那我举的例子就要有其相对的重要性，有意义才能证明是important的，所以就这样写了。这样行不？]Other field like finance, the creation of new financial tools is always the great works of those experts since they know the very difference between diverse tools and thus how they can be effectively combined with each other, the knowledge gained by there working experience. However, for the beginners, whether they are familiar with so many financial tools is still a question, let alone making important discoveries. Therefore, we should expect more on those experts for new findings.

呵呵，原来吱吱也是夜猫子，我还以为你说明天就是要睡觉起来以后了呢。
有空的话我提的几个问题再帮忙想一下啊。