ARGU194 左撇子适合从商 限时 拍必回

深谷幽兰UID: 196550

194,A recent study suggests that people who are left-handed are more likely to succeed in business than are right-handed people. Researchers studied photographs of 1,000 prominent business executives and found that 21 percent of these executives wrote with their left hand. So the percentage of prominent business executives who are left-handed (21 percent) is almost twice the percentage of people in the general population who are left-handed (11 percent). Thus, people who are left-handed would be well advised to pursue a career in business, whereas people who are right-handed would be well advised to imitate the business practices exhibited by left-handers.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The author, in this argument, claims that people who are left-handed would be well advised to pursue a career in business and those right-handed would be well advised to imitate the business practices exhibited by left-handers. However, a careful consideration will reveal how groundless the argument is.

One problem with the argument is that the 1,000 prominent business executives are not necessarily representative of the business executives overall. Common sense informs me that the 1,000 prominent business executives are only a slight part of the total number. According to the statistics that reported by a famous local newspaper that in our area there are more than 5,000 enterprises, which means that the total number of business executives throughout the world is a large statistic. Therefore, the 1,000 prominent business executives are not typical.

In the second place, the evidence of photographs cannot guarantee those prominent business executives are left-handed. It is known to all that the advanced technology today is able to do what is regarded impossible in the past, including the composed-photographs. Moreover, even if the photographs are real, it does not mean that the prominent business executives are left-handed, either. It is entirely possible that a large part of them use both the left and right hand. Thus, the argument lacks credibility to guarantee the executives are left-handed.

Finally, the argument too hastily assumes that people who are left-handed would be well advised to pursue a career in business. The author neglects other possible skills which could be better practiced by the left-handed people. Perhaps they can do better in the fields of politics, sports or education. Since the argument fails to rule out this and other alternative conditions, the conclusion of the argument is unwarranted.

In summary, the author fails to adequately support the recommendation for the left-handed people to take part in the business. To strengthen the argument, we need more evidence about the success that achieved by a great number of left-handed people and also more information on the better performance by the left-handed on the business rather than other aspects.

goodgoodstudyUID: 201753

hoho

goodgoodstudyUID: 201753

Argument194 Left-handed people and success in business

A recent study suggests that people who are left-handed are more likely to succeed in business than are right-handed people. Researchers studied photographs of 1,000 prominent business executives and found that 21 percent of executives wrote their left hand. So the percentage of prominent business executives who are left-handed (21 percent) is almost twice the percentage of people in the general population who are left-handed (11 percent). Thus, people who are left-handed would be well advised to pursue a career in business, whereas people who are right-handed would be well advised to imitate the business practices exhibited by left-handers.


This argument recommends that all the left-handed people would be well advised to pursue a career in business, because the evidence in a recent study has suggested that people who are left-handed are more likely to succeed in business. In the study, the researchers studied photographs of 1,000 prominent business executives and found that the percentage of prominent business executives who are left-handed (21 percent) is almost twice the percentage of people in the general population who are left-handed (11 percent). This argument is seemingly well supported, while in fact it is flawed in several respects.

To be the first, the author doesn’t provide enough evidence to substantiate the result of the study is statistical representative of the whole group. Only 1,000 subjects are involved in this research and the research is based on the studying of the photographs of 1,000 prominent business executives. In the photographs, a person's writing his or her left hand doesn't necessarily mean that he or she is a left-handed person and it is entire the opposite. Common technology tells us that the subject in the photographs may be just opposite to the real situation due to the process of its . Moreover, many prominent of the executives achieve their nowadays status not by means of the struggling but through other means such as familial relationships. In short, the statistical representation of the subjects is too rare to support the argument and the photographs in themselves prove little about the causal relationship between left-handedness and the ability to succeed in business.

Secondly, the study fails to do the parallel studies in other fields. Even if it is true that in the business field left-handed people are more likely to succeed by their efforts, the author overlooks the possibility that they might do better in any other filed which they would find more interesting. For examples, left-handed people have some super ability due to their different ways of actions, thus, different areas of their brain are more used than the common right-handed people. For this reason, they might own the super accurate ability to distinguish one subject from several similar ones. In this way, they maybe good at identifying the fake artwork through particular observation. So, lacking the data form the parallel studies in other fields, it's really hard to convince me that left-handedness would surely lead to success in business.

Finally, even though it is a good advice that left-handed people devote more to gain their success in the business filed, the advice that the author gives the right-handed people is totally unreasonable. Common sense informs me that any innate acumen with which the left-handed people might be endowed cannot be imitated by the right-handed people because these innate acumen are caused by the special structure of the brains of the left-handed ones. To mention a famous person Einstein, his brain is special in some area and it is just that leads to his great achievements in scientific field which could not be caught up by anyone else yet. Were there be the ability to imitate the special thinking way of Einstein, more Einsteins would have appeared, while in fact, there is none. In short, without considering and ruling out this possibility the author cannot convince me that right-handed people should imitate the business practices of left-handed people.

In sum, this argument is logically unsound. To strengthen it the author should provide a larger sample much more than 1,000 subjects and must show that the executives in the photos were in fact using their dominant hand and also they are representative of all prominent executives. To better assess the argument I would compare the percentage of left-handed people successful in business with whose who in other fields and I think the information about the feasibility of the imitation of innate acumen should be provided.

深谷幽兰UID: 196550

楼上的是限时写出么？好强啊！

csy1234567611UID: 197417

我

深谷幽兰UID: 196550

最初由 csy1234567611 发布
[B]我 [/B]

[B]是什么意思呀？汗~~~~~~~~~~~[/B]

nick530UID: 203367

先占个位，晚上熄灯了看

goodgoodstudyUID: 201753

不过就是用word改过的了,大的语法错误没有了
呵呵

深谷幽兰UID: 196550

最初由 nick530 发布
[B]先占个位，晚上熄灯了看 [/B]

呵呵! 你好强啊!
熄灯了还能看? :p

nick530UID: 203367

No.1  ARGU194 左撇子适合从商 限时 拍必回
194,A recent study suggests that people who are left-handed are more likely to succeed in business than are right-handed people. Researchers studied photographs of 1,000 prominent business executives and found that 21 percent of these executives wrote with their left hand. So the percentage of prominent business executives who are left-handed (21 percent) is almost twice the percentage of people in the general population who are left-handed (11 percent). Thus, people who are left-handed would be well advised to pursue a career in business, whereas people who are right-handed would be well advised to imitate the business practices exhibited by left-handers.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The author, in this argument, claims that people who are left-handed would be well advised to pursue a career in business and those right-handed would be well advised to imitate the business practices exhibited by left-handers. However, a careful consideration will reveal how groundless the argument is.

One problem with the argument is that the 1,000 prominent business executives are not necessarily representative of the business executives overall. Common sense informs me that the 1,000 prominent business executives are only a slightsmall就行了，不然感觉不顺 part of the total number. According to the statistics that病句，去掉that reported by a famous local newspaper that in our area there are more than 5,000 enterprises, which means that the total number of business executives throughout the world is a large statisticmight be a much larger number，不能太肯定. Therefore, the 1,000 prominent business executives are not typical.

In the second place, the evidence of photographs cannot guarantee those prominent business executives are left-handed. It is known to all that the advanced technology today is able to do what is regarded impossible in the past, including the composed-photographs. Moreover, even if the photographs are real, it does not mean that the prominent business executives are left-handed, either. It is entirely possible that a large part of them use both the left and right handhands. Thus, the argument lacks credibility to guarantee the executives are left-handed.这一段的第一个理由实在是太牵强了，想象力有点过了

Finally, the argument too hastily assumes that people who are left-handed would be well advised to pursue a career in business. The author neglects other possible skills which could be better practiced by the left-handed people. Perhaps they can do better in the fields of politics, sports or education. Since the argument fails to rule out this and other alternative conditions, the conclusion of the argument is unwarranted.

In summary, the author fails to adequately support the recommendation for the left-handed people to take part in这个词用的不太好 the business. To strengthen the argument, we need more evidence about the success that 老毛病，病句achieved by a great number of left-handed people and alsowe also need more information on the better performance byof the left-handed on the business rather than有比较级怎么能不出现than呢 other aspects.in other fields


整篇文章读起来总不太顺利，语病特别是从句应该有所改进，理由的举证可能也应该收一点，呵呵，有的太夸张了

goodgoodstudyUID: 201753

呵呵,再或者就是笔记本啦,
谢谢楼上的楼上教我优化我的签名档