寄托天下
查看: 2198|回复: 2

[i习作temp] ISSUE10 拍拍拍拍 [复制链接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
0
寄托币
2656
注册时间
2004-9-4
精华
6
帖子
5
发表于 2005-4-3 02:48:24 |显示全部楼层
Issue10:
Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.

Is it governments' responsibility to ensure financial support to major cities for their thriving? The speaker claims so, for the reason that it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are generated and preserved. As far as I am concerned, I concede that it is necessary, to some extent, to preserve the cultural traditions in cities that handed down from generation to generation. However, whether it is necessary to ensure the financial support for the cities' thriving is open to doubt.

Admittedly, I agree with the speaker that it is essential to protect and preserve the traditional culture characteristics in the cities. In this age of globalization, the traditional culture are being eroded since this world is in the course of modernization and becoming a smaller and smaller village, which results in the culture fusing among nations. Under this circumstance, the distinct characteristics of a nation, embodied in its cities, are becoming passing out of our sight. For example, Quadrate Yard Buildings are typical of old northern Chinese residential buildings, which symbolize a traditional way of life that once thriving in Northern part of China. The traditional buildings were popular years before in Beijing, capital of China. However, as more and more modern buildings are being introduced into this becoming international city, the number of this traditional type of building in Beijing is diminishing, which reflects the shrink of the traditional life styles in Quadrate Yard Building. Thus, in terms of protect the tradition, it is a necessity and responsibility for governments to finance the cities to preserve and protect the valueable cultural traditions.

However, as it is concerned that government should provide financial support for cities for the purpose of preserving traditional characteristics, another question may rise that whether all of the culture traditions should be protected. In my point of view, it is may not be the case. Whether the answer to this question is yes or no depends on two aspects of factors. One is the historical and cultural value of the characteristics, while the other is the interest and benefit they can bring to us if they are preserved. It is necessary and beneficial for us to protect those traditional features if they are both historically valuable and can benefit us in this modern business world. For example, the Forbidden City in Beijing can be cited to illustrate the point. On one hand, the Forbidden City represents a so significant historic time span of China that there is no other architectures that could serve the same function as it does; on the other, it also can bring us great economic revenue as a famous place of interests, attracting tourists from all over the world. Considering both of the two factors, it is necessary, essential and important for China's government to preserve it. In contrary, if the historic value of a cultural tradition is little, while the preservation of it can not bring any benefit for our citizens, it can be concluded that it could be eliminated, leaving the resources to serve other purposes.

What is more, whether the government needs to ensure the financial support for its major cities' thriving? Could thriving lead to a good preservation of the cultural traditions? Maybe not. Supposing the government provides adequate financial support for the major city to develop and thrive, while under the fast-changing world, the most possibility is that the city will first consider its progress and development pace with the amount of funds. And the modernization might destroy some cultural traditions. If it is this case, it will be contrary to our initial purpose.

Last but not least, as in cities, especially the major cities, the development is very fast, which makes there may be no need for the national government to support the cities. As there are fast-developing business and industries in cities, they, more likely than the rural areas, possess the abilities, no matter financially or technically, to preserve the traditions on their own. Meanwhile, rural areas, where the traditions are also generated and thriving, are less likely to preserve once the traditions are diminished. It is a pity that I can not begin to adequately address this phenomenon and its reasons here; however, it is indeed also necessary for the government to support the rural areas for the same goal, if the major cities attain the financial support.

To sum up, since in major cities, there are indeed many cultural traditions that should be preserved due to their historical value and their current value, I concede that governments should provide some support for their preservation and maintenance. However, I also hold the view that the amount and forms of the support should be discussed further, and the rural areas should possess the same chance to get the support in order to protect their cultural traditions.


欢迎拍拍,没现时,将近900字,写了我一个小时:P
世界上最遥远的距离,
不是生与死的距离,
而是我就站在你面前
你却不知道我爱你。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 16Rank: 16Rank: 16Rank: 16

声望
19
寄托币
49553
注册时间
2003-6-1
精华
40
帖子
59

Scorpio天蝎座 荣誉版主

发表于 2005-4-3 10:39:39 |显示全部楼层
No.1 ISSUE10 拍拍拍拍 947
Issue10:
Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.

Is it governments' responsibility to ensure financial support to major cities for their thriving? The speaker claims so, for the reason that it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are generated and preserved. As far as I am concerned, I concede that it is necessary, to some extent, to preserve the cultural traditions in cities that handed downhave been handed down from generation to generation. However, whether it is necessary to ensure the financial support for the cities' thriving is open to doubt.
开头很流畅,点出保护CT的necessity,并且指出城市的繁荣昌盛并非是政府的financial support
Admittedly, I agree with the speaker that it is essential to protect and preserve the traditional culture characteristics in the cities. In this age of globalization, the traditional culture are being eroded since this world is in the course of modernization and becoming a smaller and smaller village, which results in the culture fusing among nations. Under this circumstance, the distinct characteristics of a nation, embodied in its cities, are becoming passing out of our sight. For example, Quadrate Yard Buildings are typical of old northern Chinese residential buildings, which symbolize a traditional way of life that once thriving in Northern part of China. The traditional buildings were popular years before in Beijing, capital of China. However, as more and more modern buildings are being introduced into this becoming international city, the number of this traditional type of building in Beijing is diminishing, which reflects the shrink of the traditional life styles in Quadrate Yard Building. Thus, in terms of protecting the tradition, it is a necessity and responsibility for governments to finance the cities to preserve and protect the valueable cultural traditions.写的很好,要保护

However, as it is concerned that government should provide financial support for cities for the purpose of preserving traditional characteristics, another question may rise that whether all of the culture traditions should be protected. In my point of view, it is may not be the case. Whether the answer to this question is yes or no depends on two aspects of factors. One is the historical and cultural value of the characteristics, while the other is the interest and benefit they can bring to us if they are preserved. It is necessary and beneficial for us to protect those traditional features if they are both historically valuable and can benefit us in this modern business world. For example, the Forbidden City in Beijing can be cited to illustrate the point. On one hand, the Forbidden City represents a so significant historic time span of China that there is no other architectures that could serve the same function as it does; on the other, it also can bring us great economic revenue as a famous place of interests, attracting tourists from all over the world. Considering both of the two factors, it is necessary, essential and important for China's government to preserve it. In contrary, if the historic value of a cultural tradition is little, while the preservation of it can not bring any benefit for our citizens, it can be concluded that it could be eliminated, leaving the resources to serve other purposes.你提出:并不是所有的都要保护。

What is more, whether the government needs to ensure the financial support for its major cities' thriving? Could thriving lead to a good preservation of the cultural traditions? Maybe not. Supposing the government provides adequate financial support for the major city to develop and thrive, while under the fast-changing world, the most possibility is that the city will first consider its progress and development pace with the amount of funds. And the modernization might destroy some cultural traditions. If it is this case, it will be contrary to our initial purpose.
G去资助cities会引起misleading:大家都等着政府投资,可以
Last but not least, as in cities, especially the major cities, the development is very fast, which makes there may be no need for the national government to support the cities. As there are fast-developing business and industries in cities, they, more likely than the rural areas, possess the abilities, no matter financially or technically, to preserve the traditions on their own. Meanwhile, rural areas, where the traditions are also generated and thriving, are less likely to preserve once the traditions are diminished. It is a pity that I can not begin to adequately address this phenomenon and its reasons here; however, it is indeed also necessary for the government to support the rural areas for the same goal, if the major cities attain the financial support.G更应该资助rural areas,如果要保护cities,写的不错

To sum up, since in major cities, there are indeed many cultural traditions that should be preserved due to their historical value and their current value, I concede that governments should provide some support for their preservation and maintenance. However, I also hold the view that the amount and forms of the support should be discussed further, and the rural areas should possess the same chance to get the support in order to protect their cultural traditions.
注意一下部分词语的表达,未及一一订正,见谅

欢迎拍拍,没现时,将近900字,写了我一个小时:P
重返寄托

三十而立 战战兢兢
如临深渊 如履薄冰

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
1718
注册时间
2005-2-8
精华
0
帖子
1
发表于 2005-4-9 09:53:40 |显示全部楼层
很不错的一篇文章

使用道具 举报

RE: ISSUE10 拍拍拍拍 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
ISSUE10 拍拍拍拍
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-261408-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部