ISSUE36 按照自己反思的思路改的一篇，大家提点建议

sblbaslerUID: 175229

Issue 36 the greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.

In the ear of admiring praise leading to the promotion of people’s adherence to evaluating the greatness of individuals, there exists a widespread awareness that only by those who live in the future, not by their contemporaries, can the greatness of individuals be decided. Just valid, however, this conclusion may be, it only skims the surface of the problem. As not approve to the commonly belief, I advocate that the core of the process of evaluating the greatness of individuals cannot be determined only by distinguishing the time they live in but also by the limit on making the decision.

Granted that from the pace of history, we have a natural tendency------- a tendency that a myriad of misunderstandings have been clarified, however, we suffer a titanic limit in the dark corner of the history is, as well, the limit which acts as a crux in determining the proceeding discussion, such as inability of understanding a new theory, political intention, failure of appreciating a art work and the like, imposed by different time or society or even people.

First, some of the greatness of individuals could be interpreted by their contemporaries mainly due to its lack of limits on the current time. In China we admire Chairman Deng Xiaoping for his contribution to promoting our current life and the increasing amount of money we have gained as In South Africa, they admire David Moulds(就是曼德拉，我查了他的英文名好象是这个) for his bringing liberty to his compatriot especially those who live in slavery; Among women, they adore Mother Teresa for her kindness and love for those who are poor as among Black Americans, they adore Martin Luther King for his persistence and sacrifice in gaining rights and effacing the discrimination in America. The reason that these “lucky dogs” deserve such reputation lies in the fact that they aptly explore the essential and potential desires their contemporaries bear in the bottom of their minds and hearts and more importantly bring these desires into reality which illustrates an increasing beautiful future ahead.

By contrast, some of individuals could not deserve such a fortune as the formers. Their greatness can hardly be not greater than that in the proceeding discussion, the reason the contemporaries does not accept it is that it is imposed on some limits varying from subjective to objective. From the perspective of “subjective” ---- mainly from the political intention------ Liu Shaoqi, the state founder of China, the great militarist, the chairman of Party, persecuted to death during the Revolutionary Culture, whose reputation was renewed until about 20 years later is just an exact case in point. This kind of tragedy is due to the limits which are imposed in terms of  the time and the politics, which does not substantiate the lack of greatness of individuals but lend credence to the tendency that contemporaries deny and eliminate the greatness for a political purpose at the cost of decaying the significance of individual’s contribution. From the perspective of “objective”----- mainly from the inability of knowing the nature------The countless examples in the history of Noble Praise that scientists’ new theories cannot be accepted during a period varying from years to tens of years ------ Max Planck’s 18 years waiting for the Noble Praise, or in the field of art, Van Gogh’s years of “waiting” in the heaven for being accepted and the like. This kind of failure of recognition originated from the limit forced through the inability of foreseeing the nature of the world, which generates out of our will at the same time out of our control as well. Therefore, limits are the crux in making decision on evaluating the greatness of individuals.

To sum up, for those whose greatness can be accepted should not be shy for their appreciation in that they deserve it; for those whose greatness is unfairly decided, not due to its own errors but the limit imposed from all directions of the society, should not be discouraged for those who fail to see their greatness will undoubtedly bogged down and find it counterproductive in the near future. Maybe the task of fairly deciding the greatness of individuals without any limits is hard, however, the difficult of the task is no excuse for avoiding it.

sblbaslerUID: 175229

Issue 36 the greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.

In the ear of admiring praise leading to the promotion of people’s adherence to evaluating the greatness of individuals, there exists a widespread awareness that only by those who live in the future, not by their contemporaries, can the greatness of individuals be decided. Just valid, however, this conclusion may be, it only skims the surface of the problem. As not approve to the commonly belief, I advocate that the core of the process of evaluating the greatness of individuals cannot be determined only by distinguishing the time they live in but also by the limit on making the decision.

Granted that from the pace of history, what we can see is the fact that an increasing number of misunderstandings have been clarified, however, what we cannot see in the dark corner of the history is, as well, the fact that the crux in determining the proceeding discussion is the limits, such as inability of understanding a new theory, political intention, failure of appreciating a art work and the like, imposed by different time or society or even people.

First, some of the greatness of individuals could be interpreted by their contemporaries mainly due to its lack of limits on the current time. In China we admire Chairman Deng Xiaoping for his contribution to promoting our current life and the increasing amount of money we have gained as In South Africa, they admire David Moulds(就是曼德拉，我查了他的英文名好象是这个) for his bringing liberty to his compatriot especially those who live in slavery; Among women, they adore Mother Teresa for her kindness and love for those who are poor as among Black Americans, they adore Martin Luther King for his persistence and sacrifice in gaining rights and effacing the discrimination in America. [U]The greatness of all those adverted above is appreciated by not simply their contemporaries, but also by their descendants because these greatness lacks of limits whether imposed by political intention or others.[/U]

By contrast, some of individuals could not deserve such a fortune as the formers. Their greatness can hardly be not greater than that in the proceeding discussion, the reason the contemporaries does not accept it is that it is imposed on some limits varying from subjective to objective. From the perspective of “subjective” ---- mainly from the political intention------ Liu Shaoqi, the state founder of China, the great militarist, the chairman of Party, persecuted to death during the Revolutionary Culture, whose reputation was renewed until about 20 years later is just an exact case in point. This kind of limit is imposed by the time and the politics. [B][U] 加了一句评论[/U][/B]  From the perspective of “objective”----- mainly from the inability of knowing the nature------The countless examples in the history of Noble Praise that scientists’ new theories cannot be accepted during a period varying from years to tens of years ------ Max Planck’s 18 years waiting for the Noble Praise, or in the field of art, Van Gogh’s years of “waiting” in the heaven for recognizing and the like. [U]This kind of limit is imposed by the inability in understanding new things. [/U]  Therefore, limits are the crux in making decision on evaluating the greatness of individuals.

[U]To sum up, since limits play such an essential role in determining people’s estimation on the greatness of individuals, what we should do is to avoid the subjective limits and decrease the objective limits as many as possible, therefore not making any hasty generalization[/U] .

sblbaslerUID: 175229

后面的是以前写的，加下划线的地方是在新的文章中做了改动的

sblbaslerUID: 175229

就是说我在每个例子后面加上了评论，像我发的那个帖子上写的，我想试着讲出例子与主题的关系，为什么用这个例子。结尾全部重新改了一下，主要是以前的根本没有总结全文，而新的尝试着把各个BODY的内容加起来。

天晴了UID: 201592

Issue 36 the greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.

In the ear of admiring praise leading to the promotion of people's adherence to evaluating the greatness of individuals, there exists a widespread awareness that only by those who live in the future, not by their contemporaries, can the greatness of individuals be decided. Just valid, however, this conclusion may be, it only skims the surface of the problem. 【我意会了 但是你言传的不是很清楚】 As not approve to the commonly belief, I advocate that the core of the process of evaluating the greatness of individuals cannot be determined only by distinguishing the time they live in but also by the limit on making the decision.    【 旧观点太长了 不知道陷时写会不会比较浪费时间 基本观点和我的同一篇很像 】

Granted that from the pace of history, we have a natural tendency------- a tendency that a myriad of misunderstandings have been clarified, however, we suffer a titanic limit in the dark corner of the history is, as well, the limit which acts as a crux in determining the proceeding discussion, such as inability of understanding a new theory, political intention, failure of appreciating a art work and the like, imposed by different time or society or even people.     【把标准先促来 GOOD 】

First, some of the greatness of individuals could be interpreted by their contemporaries mainly due to its lack of limits on the current time. In China we admire Chairman Deng Xiaoping for his contribution to promoting our current life and the increasing amount of money we have gained as In South Africa, they admire David Moulds(就是曼德拉，我查了他的英文名好象是这个) for his bringing liberty to his compatriot especially those who live in slavery; Among women, they adore Mother Teresa for her kindness and love for those who are poor as among Black Americans, they adore Martin Luther King for his persistence and sacrifice in gaining rights and effacing the discrimination in America. The reason that these "lucky dogs" deserve such reputation lies in the fact that they aptly explore the essential and potential desires their contemporaries bear in the bottom of their minds and hearts and more importantly bring these desires into reality which illustrates an increasing beautiful future ahead.  【  觉得这样分情况的 写一个例子的总结尤其重要  楼主那篇心得帖子蛮有价值】

By contrast, some of individuals could not deserve such a fortune as the formers. Their greatness can hardly be not greater than that in the proceeding discussion, the reason the contemporaries does not accept it is that it is imposed on some limits varying from subjective to objective. 【 清楚  】From the perspective of "subjective" ---- mainly from the political intention------ Liu Shaoqi, the state founder of China, the great militarist, the chairman of Party, persecuted to death during the Revolutionary Culture, whose reputation was renewed until about 20 years later is just an exact case in point. This kind of tragedy is due to the limits which are imposed in terms of the time and the politics, which does not substantiate the lack of greatness of individuals but lend credence to the tendency that contemporaries deny and eliminate the greatness for a political purpose at the cost of decaying the significance of individual's contribution. From the perspective of "objective"----- mainly from the inability of knowing the nature------The countless examples in the history of Noble Praise that scientists' new theories cannot be accepted during a period varying from years to tens of years ------ Max Planck's 18 years waiting for the Noble Praise, or in the field of art, Van Gogh's years of "waiting" in the heaven【 哈 】 for being accepted and the like. This kind of failure of recognition originated from the limit forced through the inability of foreseeing the nature of the world, which generates out of our will at the same time out of our control as well. Therefore, limits are the crux in making decision on evaluating the greatness of individuals.
【文采不错 句子都太长了 就读着累了  体谅一下ETS判卷则的阿姨们吧～】

To sum up, for those whose greatness can be accepted should not be shy for their appreciation in that they deserve it; for those whose greatness is unfairly decided, not due to its own errors but the limit imposed from all directions of the society, should not be discouraged for those who fail to see their greatness will undoubtedly bogged down and find it counterproductive in the near future. Maybe the task of fairly deciding the greatness of individuals without any limits is hard, however, the difficult of the task is no excuse for avoiding it.  【回应的主题 就是无法说到底是古人还是同时代的人 也没法给出标准  我的同一片和 ISSUE 159人和机器谁聪明那篇 也是和未来有关的题像你这样回应的主题 不知道是不是会不稳妥在考试中 留着讨论
或者起码应该再点一下题目  说。。。需要由什么东西决定 给出标准 是一个case－by－case的事情 嗯 我的问题也有 你说呢】

问题主要在头尾 文章和以前不同了 ：）  加油！！