- 最后登录
- 2008-1-20
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 622
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-7-10
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 504
- UID
- 2115432
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 622
- 注册时间
- 2005-7-10
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
仅做参考,请也帮我看一下
Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people.
------正文------
As human history is a history to conquer and develop new world, it is easily tempting to disagree (with)the speaker. However, from some other aspects, such as environmental preservation and the choice right(直接用choice or right or option 这是选择权吧) of the minorities, to some extent the speaker’s claim has special meanings. (specific 好象要好些,因为你强调的是other meanings , special 特殊的好象不是很好)
For one thing, whether the preservation of wilderness areas could be beneficial to environment depends on their own geological characteristics. On the one hand, some wastelands actually have little to do with the improvement of environment, such as deserts and Salinas . If developed rather than left in their natural state, these areas may bring more benefits than one can imagine. For instance, Lasvigas, just a desert without people before exploiture(exploitation), became a world-famous entertainment area and its prosperous(prosperity) and golden sight(scene) makes(make) ones there forget they are in the desert, while the consequent economic profits makes the city a miracle( “of the desert” delete). On the other hand, only developing wilderness areas for economic benefit(s) blindly may be harmful to the environment. Lots of the wilderness areas function as the accommodator of the environment, excessive development(exploitation, opening) of such areas may exert influence on the global climate and finally do harm to the environment. For instance, the exploitation of the rain forest is a catastrophe to all the humans in the world, since rain forest is the most important modulator of the global climate and the destroy(destruction )of it caused by the exploitation makes the global precipitation deviant to the normal situation. An effective government should realize the two different situations above and make the correct decision.
For another thing, whether to preserve some wilderness areas has some relevance to the sensation of people who live there even they are only a few. On the one hand, some people in the wilderness areas are in consistent with the mainstream society, and they often dream of being as advanced as society outside their world. In this case, government should put much energy and money to help them develop their homestead and get rid of poverty. On the other hand, some minority peoples living in the remote areas for some historic reasons may not want to join in the mainstream society but to keep their own customs and natural state. In this case, government should not intervene in their life excessively and the exploitation of the areas should be consistent with(in accordance with 因前面已有一个了,所以给你改改) the will of the minorities. For instance, Chinese minorities are authorized automatic rights to develop their own home, and what the government does is just to give help whenever they need; the delectable result is the remote areas are developed and different peoples are living together in harmony.(这里有点小疑问,尊重是好但是不是应该不能完全由当地人自己决定呢,国家的位子何在)
Last but not the least, the cost and the benefit of either the preservation or the exploiture (exploitation)is something the government has to consider. To meliorate the whole Gobi desert into an oasis may improve the climate and environment there, but the high cost used in some other areas may help to achieve more environmental amelioration. In this circumstance, even if the exploiture is conducive to the environment, the costly way should not be adopted by the government. As to this issue, to weigh the cost and benefit, the advantages and disadvantages, government must have a foresight.
To sum up, the necessity and the rationality of preservation of the wilderness areas is a complex and case-by-case issue, and to find a correct answer to this issue, the government should take lots of things, both materially and emotionally, into account and solve it when all comes to all.(总的来说应该说要表答的都清楚了,建议第二分论点用事实论据,第三个用假设对比a and b 论证)
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=299010 |
|