V6战队日用贴（停止接受新人）

mrealUID：201732

kobestrong：https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=311626&fpage=1&highlight=v6
nickaaronlee：https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=312215&fpage=1&highlight=v6
dingzl：https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=311641&fpage=1&highlight=v6

dr_greenUID：193584

这个 我觉得IQ 和 reasoning and other cognitive skills 还是有区别的 作为智商每个人都有 但是reasoning and other cognitive skills就不是了 必须要通过适当的培养
我觉得这道题是不是隐含着再说现金社会不重视逻辑思维能力的培养
比如教育太过job-oriented； 文化趋向视觉文化；什么的

zehuaUID：199246

Originally posted by dr_green at 2005-8-6 08:52
这个 我觉得IQ 和 reasoning and other cognitive skills 还是有区别的 作为智商每个人都有 但是reasoning and other cognitive skills就不是了 必须要通过适当的培养
我觉得这道题是不是隐含着再说现金社会不重 ...

就是这样啊！:lol

zehuaUID：199246

看完ARG题库，感觉这么题很难写，没话说，错误找不出3个：
59，153，166，197，237。
请大家帮忙看看好嘛？

mkb57288UID：2105771

According to the speaker, historians are essentially storytellers for the reason that they have to construct history by interpreting discrete evidence, which the author asserts is more of a creative pursuit than an objective one. While I concede that it is necessary and meaningful for historians to build up a clear picture of history by the interpretation of evidence available to them, I disagree strongly that such exploration is a creative and subjective process. Additionally, I also take exception to the author's assertion that defines historians as storytellers which is potentially misleading and might confuse the real nature and mission of historians with that of other widely accepted storytellers such as poets, novelists and play writers.  

Admittedly, almost all work of the historians bases on the interpretation of evidence at hand since historians cannot experience the past in person. For example, historians who desire to research into the spread of some life-threatening epidemics in Europe during the medieval ages have to resort to the historic records and documents to find relevant evidence and then analyze, sort out and apply the useful information to present the concrete and clear picture of the special situation during that time. Even for the historians who record the life of the contemporary society can not witness all the matters and it is wholly possible that they carry out researches on the affairs that take place in other places that they have never been personally. Imagine, for example, a hypothetical historian who has never traveled to Asia intends to conduct research on the regime of Taliban in Afghanistan. What he/she does is similar to the historians focusing on the history of the past, that is to gather innumerable information, to pick out the meaningful ones and then interpret these evidence. Although this example is merely an imagination, but it, along with the former example, pinpoints the nature and mission of historians primarily rely on interpreting evidence to construct history.

Nevertheless, I disagree with the author insofar as such process of interpreting evidence is a creative rather than an objective one. To illustrate this point, I would like to make an analogy between the work of physicist whose tasks are to interpret the physical world around us and that of historians. Any observant person can easily find out that although the subject matter of the two kinds of researchers are fundamentally distinct, the process that they have to follow to complete their tasks is similar, both of which involves the process mentioned above. Some people may argue that in physics there are countless principles, theories and axioms that researchers can comply with to ensure the objectivity  of their researches. However, although there might lack so many rigid frameworks for historians to abide by, the underlying assumption that any serious historian is required to follow is to establish all their interpretations on the basis of the factual evidence. In reality, it is a universal groundwork for both historians and physicists to base all their endeavor on fact and objectivity. In short, the inquiry of historians is an objective process by nature.

Moreover, I contend that " storytellers" might be an inappropriate term to define historians, which easily induce people to confuse the work of historians with that of other true storytellers such as novelists and so forth. Yet a clear line must be drawn between the usually called storytellers and historians. While the former can create any historic events unfetteredly for whom history only serves as the carrier of the emotion and feeling that they try to convey the later have to respect and follow the historic fact rigidly. Historians are by no means granted the license to create history in line with their envision and imagination. Although the personal experience, training, perspective and other innate aspects of historians tend to result in the bias and deviation in the interpretation from facts, these are the inextricable and objective elements to successful interpretation of history.  For example, although storytellers such as Charles Dickens can create various fake  historical events to mirror the poverty and social stratification during the Victorian era historians focusing on the society of the same time period have to depict the social picture accurately and precisely according to the records passed down from that time. In short, it is inaccurate and improper to view historians as storytellers which might grant historians excessive rights in distorting history rather than interpreting it.

To sum up, while I consent to the author that the work of historians indispensably involves the interpretation of historic evidence, I strongly disagree to view this process as a creative and subjective one. Furthermore, it is preposterous to call historians storytellers which deviates from the true tasks and nature of historians.

mrealUID：201732

感觉很牛的样子啊~~~语言没的挑，条理也挺清楚，限时还写这么多字啊，要崩溃了，呵呵~

mrealUID：201732

我一直在用的提纲，不过好像和前几天xiaowenzi和hust发的差不多，想不出来的可以参考一下啊队长~~~有的写的有些牵强，不过一般的都可以接受。
比如：
59.        flu epidemics,sunspot activity 论断：容易感冒的人应该避免长时间晒太阳。因为根据已有的医疗记录，过去300年六次世界范围的流感发生年份太阳斑活动很频繁，既太阳接收比平时更多的太阳能量。 •论断的前提不一定成立。前提是长时间晒太阳会使人容易感冒，论者没有为此提供任何资料。 •论断的论据没有说服力。首先这次流感年里是否有其它原因造成了流感，其次是否太阳班活动会带其他的气候变化，比如气温易波动。并不是因为能量多就造成。第三过去300年里是否只有这六年太阳斑活跃，是否还有活跃的年份但没有发生流感。 •论断的结论武断。如果晒太阳会使人容易感冒，是否就应该避免。医生经常建议多晒太阳对身体有利，是否能有办法调合使这两个矛盾的健康结论：论者的结论建立在历史的巧合上，增加说服力他还应该提供有关晒太阳对感冒或引起感冒的研究资料。

mrealUID：201732

Originally posted by mkb57288 at 2005-8-5 22:26
不知道各位有没有看过嘉文博译的argument的，不知道感觉怎么样

没有这么多时间了，早就下过，一直没有看，你看过没？感觉如何？

mkb57288UID：2105771

能在这儿贴一下么，可能对摆脱280的模版有帮助

mkb57288UID：2105771

The arts (painting, music, literature, etc.) reveal the otherwise hidden ideas and impulses of a society
这个题目中的otherwise，是否暗示了hidden impulses只能由艺术揭示出来呢

xiaowenzi118UID：202887

北美范文上翻的是其它方面，个人觉得不必太计较这个词吧，应该没有那个意思吧

xiaowenzi118UID：202887

不知题目的意思是否是说社会对critical thinking的能力不重视呢？那就只能说社会现在的教育过于教条，思维过于保守什么的了吧，经常take it for granted， 不知道去分析什么的。

mrealUID：201732

嘉文博译的范文（整理版）
也是在寄托精华区下的~
你的时间似乎还有很多，而且280也背的都摆脱不了了，呵呵，换着看看也好 =D

mrealUID：201732

issue的

xiaowenzi118UID：202887

这是开头:In today’s highly competitive world, intellectual qualities such as reasoning and other cognitive skills become more and more important for us to keep up with the fast pace of the society. Some people think the society does not place enough emphasis on these skills. However, in fact, our society actually places too much emphasis on them while neglecting the importance of some non-intellectual skills.
提纲:
1.Our society never stops to make every effort to provide the students with intellectual skills like reasoning and other cognitive skills.
2.However, while preparing them with intellectual skills, the society often neglects the importance of some non-intellectual skills.
3.In fact, the benefits of non-intellectual skills could outweigh that of intellectual skills.
4.In sum, well-balance citizens.

只有这样才能最大程度利用我的原文了。哎，来不及写了，大家帮我看看合不合逻辑吧，只要不偏题就好了。希望没那么背运抽到这题:@，不过总比低频的好;P。