V6战队日用贴（停止接受新人）

wineyreUID: 2106739

呵呵,这两天上网会不方便.我估计要到4号的样子才能正常上网吧.
不过估计我也没空上网了~~最后几天了~~

mkb57288UID: 2105771

The list below indicates some of the common transition words indicating logical connections between sentences and paragraphs. The words are grouped according to the logical function they carry out (this list is not meant to be comprehensive).
x        XPO,^ NO
&@#lC)I
Wx1. Words indicating a continuity with what has gone before: and, in addition, moreover, furthermore, also, indeed, besides, secondly, next, similarly, again, equally important, beyond that.
#v&W[X:s9b iqdP[B留学,考试,TOEFL,GRE,GMAT,IELTS,SAT,VISA,文书,签证,论坛,出国,申请,美国,英国,欧洲,加拿大,USA"b6B2rj
x5S+Yar
2. Words indicating an example or illustration of a point introducing evidence: for example, for instance, as an illustration.
2_`g8iF:\1_
)p8Jt+s6yhY
mbbs.gter.net3. Words adding emphasis to a point which is reinforcing a previous point: in fact, in other words, that is, indeed, as a matter of fact.
$S?%Hj
h#u;uS;OG寄托家园
.bM)K3g.ETu5R0s1G+E4. Words indicating a conclusion from or a result of what you have just been discussing: thus, hence, therefore, consequently, as a result.9DX6Q)PG PWF

J`6f        mbR寄托家园5. Words indicating a contrast with what has just been said: but, however, nevertheless, by contrast, on the other hand, conversely.留学,考试,TOEFL,GRE,GMAT,IELTS,SAT,VISA,文书,签证,论坛,出国,申请,美国,英国,欧洲,加拿大,USAw        VPy8\6J

ov)wHX3{
6. Words indicating a qualification, doubt, or reservation about what you have just been discussing: no doubt, of course, to be sure.
F1?$UB,|8K~g|留学|签证|TOEFL|GRE
3t#c?$p+`%oL
t0W8hbbs.gter.net7. Words indicating a summary statement is coming up: in short, all in all, in brief, in conclusion, to conclude, given all this.|留学|签证|TOEFL|GREXFR(`
tC$@wc
h|E1a\dJ
8. Pronoun and adjectival links to something which has gone before: this, that, the above-mentioned, such.
e8o"Z
fl+]|留学|签证|TOEFL|GRE
n8`
`(p0w)r寄托家园9. Words establishing time relationships (important in narrative paragraphs): after, afterwards, then, later, before, while, at the same time, immediately, thereupon, next, meanwhile, subsequently, previously, simultaneously.|留学|签证|TOEFL|GREL:}G5I*H        S~tR
/h/D`%Mj
10. Words indicating spatial relationships (important in physical descriptions): above, beside, next to, on the other side, facing, parallel, across from, adjacent.bbs.gter.net
XrR}
p,g

mkb57288UID: 2105771

怎么是这样的，没时间改了，大家凑合着看

mkb57288UID: 2105771

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... ge=1&highlight=

虽然个人认为是用来写paper得不完全适用于Issue但是还是很可借鉴的

iceoolongUID: 180112

支持mkb说的，日用帖大家一定要日日用啊
最近在考虑issue的写法，有点摸不着头脑，过两天那两篇让大家拍拍
先帮忙看看刚刚限时的阿狗
http://edu.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=329053
想和大家讨论下，阿狗的写法，个人感觉关键是在批驳的严密上吧
逻辑上是首要的吧，语言固然重要，但是很难短期提高了啊
开头结尾的写法呢，结尾似乎没用，开头如何？

iceoolongUID: 180112

晕哦，怎么又是一日没人用阿

xiaowenzi118UID: 202887

9月的第一天，想到九月要考的战友了。加油加油。

今天文章回来了，居然中了，又要回去做实验补数据去了，真是又喜又烦呀。

所以本科的各位多多努力，到了研一再考就会像我这样了。就是逃课也不行了。:O

wineyreUID: 2106739

不好意思,考完了~~
机经:I150,A71
还有一题I很眼熟的~~不记得是什么了~~

wineyreUID: 2106739

最后几天因为不能上网,所以一直在看以前下的太傻的东西,有一部分的一休题纲很是不错,对开拓思路很有帮助的~~
呵呵,我晚点发上来~~

wineyreUID: 2106739

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=330765
我最后两天用的资料~~大家有兴趣可以看看~~

wineyreUID: 2106739

剩下的几位队员一定要加油~~
虽然可能ttzoe看不到,可是还是要说,其实走过了,回头去看没有那么难的,无论什么时候都不要轻言放弃~~

mkb57288UID: 2105771

附件打不开，能压缩一下再发么

mkb57288UID: 2105771

不知道大家认为argument有没有一些高频的参考价值
看了更新到2/9机井，发现零频还是有70道
现在在主攻总频率在5以上的题目--116道
以前看过一遍全部的题库，不知道现在要是不看剩下的一半题目会不会风险很大

wineyreUID: 2106739

你的这个问题估计ETS也答不上来~~晕的~~
所谓的random其实也有很多种的,不过应该不是independent random,可能是pseudo random什么的~~

mkb57288UID: 2105771

------题目------
The following appeared in a medical newsletter.
'Doctors have long suspected that secondary infections may keep some patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. This hypothesis has now been proved by preliminary results of a study of two groups of patients. The first group of patients, all being treated for muscle injuries by Dr. Newland, a doctor who specializes in sports medicine, took antibiotics regularly throughout their treatment. Their recuperation time was, on average, 40 percent quicker than typically expected. Patients in the second group, all being treated by Dr. Alton, a general physician, were given sugar pills, although the patients believed they were taking antibiotics. Their average recuperation time was not significantly reduced. Therefore, all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment.'
------正文------
Before accepting the prescribed antibiotic for all patients suffering from muscle strain, it is necessary to examine the reliability carefully. In my observation, the well-organized by poorly-reasoned argument suffers from several logic fallacies: first, the study, upon which author's conclusion established, is absent of details, then probably dubious; secondly,  many other factors influencing the healing of muscle strain are overlooked; finally, the author seems to generalize imprudently. Now, I will analyze these one by one.

To begin with, to be reliable evidence, mentioned study must be strictly controlled. In other words, the anticipating patients must be identical in all related aspects. The author, however, fails to do so. It is highly possible that people in the first group are much stronger than those in the second group, and their healthy physique helps to reduce the time for convalescence. It is equally possible that patients in the first group are much younger than their counterparts in the control group, which may also accelerate the process of healing. The author even fails to consider influence imposed on the study result by different sexes, for it is highly possible that male can enjoy a quicker healing than female. Furthermore no evidence is provided about the number of samples in each group. If the number is too small, then the conclusion's representativeness of the overall pool will surely be weakened. As a result, the author cannot claim it is suitable for every patient with muscle strain to take antibiotics.

Another problem with the argument is that the author overlooks other factors that may influence the result of study. Even from the description of author's, we can notice one conspicuously different factor--that is different physicians. It is might the case that doctor specializing in sports medicine helps in reducing the time spent on convalescence, for he or she is much more capable than the general physician in treating muscle strain, which is a manifestation of sport injury. Or perhaps, patients in the first group receive more intensive care from nurses or some extra treatment, say kneading on the strained muscle. In short, before ruling out other possible factors that influence the time spent on healing, the author fails to convince me it is antibiotic rather than other factors that accelerate the process of convalescence.

Last but not least, even if secondary infections keep some patients from healing quick after 'severe' muscle strain, what about the patients with ordinary or minor muscle strain? No evidence shows that there is a good chance for these patients to get secondary infection. Therefore, antibiotics may be not necessary at all. Moreover, as we know, antibiotics is often of some side-effect, and not suitable for every. That is to say, following the generalization of the author, we actually take potential risk of undermining the health of patients.

To sum up, the mentioned fallacies severely weaken the reliability of the argument. To better support his or her conclusion, the author must substantiate that the study is strictly controlled and all factors that may influence the result are precluded. Meanwhile, to get a sounder conclusion, the author also tries hard to avoid any imprudent generalization as he does at the end of the argument.