寄托天下
楼主: zehua
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[未归类] V6战队日用贴(停止接受新人) [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
1547
注册时间
2005-6-5
精华
0
帖子
4
1081
发表于 2005-9-4 14:00:07 |只看该作者
这一篇和综合版的那篇一样......

使用道具 举报

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

声望
0
寄托币
6174
注册时间
2005-6-1
精华
2
帖子
25
1082
发表于 2005-9-4 15:33:28 |只看该作者
对啊,到处贴一下,怕人看不到
在把下午的一篇Issue贴上来
If you think English is easy, take GRE
If you think math is easy, take wavelet
If you think life is easy, take a girlfriend

使用道具 举报

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

声望
0
寄托币
6174
注册时间
2005-6-1
精华
2
帖子
25
1083
发表于 2005-9-4 15:33:57 |只看该作者
------题目------
Society should identify those children who have special talents and abilities and begin training them at an early age so that they can eventually excel in their areas of ability. Otherwise, these talents are likely to remain undeveloped.
------正文------
Although a society cannot develop quickly without certain experts or talents, I strongly disagree with the speaker on the assertion that children have special talents should be identified and trained to ensure they can excel in given fields. Because by doing so, we actually strive to shape a society admiring elitism at the expense of equality.

In the ever-developing ear, it seems tempting to agree with the speaker that we should cultivate talented children to help our society develop more quickly. After all, these children are so distinguished in given fields that they can accomplish the same achievement with considerable less effort than ordinary ones. In this case, it will be definitely redeemable loss that leaving such talents unexploited. However, I cast doubt on the speaker's assertion that training them at an early age will bring about a better world, by which I mean more equal, more balanced and more harmonious.

One threshold problem with the assertion is that we cannot choose fair criteria to determine which talents and abilities are more worthy cultivating. For better or not, in the society lionizing pragmatism, it is highly possible that talents associated with economic success get preferred. For instance, a children talented in mathematics or physics is usually be given extraordinary attention and training, because his talents are likely to bring about certain direct breakthrough in information technology that can create a mint of money as a result. On the other hand, children talented in folklore study tends to flag into oblivion, for their success seems to be obsolete and can hardly result in any economic success. In fact, by streaming children to two groups separately labeled talented and ordinary, we seem to be encouraging certain elitism. In my observation, the stream can not justify itself by allocating educational resources unequally even at the very beginning of one's life. However, all the children are equal citizens in the future; therefore they should not be excluded from some privileges intended to a handful of people, which will deprive them of the opportunity for self-development.

Furthermore, it seems presumptuous for the speaker to assert that the well-trained children can eventually excel in their areas and benefit our society as a result. In my observation, such training designed for so-called talented is usually featured by intensive inculcation of knowledge, which, too often, take up so much time that prevent the children from enjoying their childhood. Due to such psychological defect, these children are likely to take study as a boring and unfruitful process that brings about little happiness. After all, individuals, who are absent of interest, can hardly work effectively in given fields. Moreover, it is also possible that our educators underscore intellect and so-called talent nurture at the expense of skill in socialization, a valuable characteristic demanded by modern society. Without proper communication and coordination with others, any individual, no matter how talented he is, can never contribute significantly to our society.

In the concern whether the ethic maturity can keep pace with that of intellect, lies another reason why I take exception to the speaker's claim. If the well-trained children can only excel in given technical field while show little maturity in ethics, our society is likely to suffer from the effort of nurturing such talents. Consider the increasingly rampant criminals over Internet. Many of those attribute to some teenagers, who excel at information technology but lack certain maturity or wisdom to discern right from wrong. In this case, nurturing such talents before ethic mature accomplishes little to the well-being of our society and even serves as a backfire.

In final analysis, before fully accepting the author's assertion, we are obliged to make sure that the children are ethically qualified for the training. Moreover, we should also avoid elitism to prevent our society devolving into an unequal one.
If you think English is easy, take GRE
If you think math is easy, take wavelet
If you think life is easy, take a girlfriend

使用道具 举报

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

声望
0
寄托币
6174
注册时间
2005-6-1
精华
2
帖子
25
1084
发表于 2005-9-6 20:54:17 |只看该作者

水一下

最后顶一下这个帖子,算是告别了
很多记忆
而且正好是第616个帖子,也比较吉利,嘿嘿
If you think English is easy, take GRE
If you think math is easy, take wavelet
If you think life is easy, take a girlfriend

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
0
寄托币
3144
注册时间
2005-8-4
精华
1
帖子
46
1085
发表于 2005-9-6 22:22:43 |只看该作者
还有多少人没考?加油!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

声望
0
寄托币
6174
注册时间
2005-6-1
精华
2
帖子
25
1086
发表于 2005-9-12 11:43:53 |只看该作者

因该是所有人都离开了吧

不知道是不是该封帖了,呵呵
If you think English is easy, take GRE
If you think math is easy, take wavelet
If you think life is easy, take a girlfriend

使用道具 举报

RE: V6战队日用贴(停止接受新人) [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
V6战队日用贴(停止接受新人)
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-305207-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部