ISSUE157 写的很努力，大家来发拍吧

禾日因心UID: 174510

When human beings begin to observe the world around them, their observation is divided into the objective and the subjective. Then there has been much dispute over whether there is purely objective observation or all the observation is subjective. After taking several factors into account, I concede that there is no such thing as purely objective observation, yet I still put some doubt into the assertion that all observation is subjective.

As human beings, we have our own thinking and so much emotion that we look into something, difficultly, without any propensity. Based on different experience, desires and expectation, our observation is unconsciously guided by these factors. Purely objective observation is just like the moon in the river, which can never be touched. In the art field, it is hardly that when the observers see the smile of Mona Lisa, they can agree on what kind of the smile really is. When the poets come to see the same river, according to their present moods, the descriptions they make would bring different feelings to others, melancholy or exciting, bitter or delight. Referring to the political realm, it is known to all that one remark or statement always represents certain group’s benefit, no matter what the remarks from the disvantaged or the power.  Then concerning the law, the independent trials from the impartial judge still make how many people suffer from the seemingly purely objective judgments.

   Even the natural science, the most accurate, objective field can not claim that they have purely objective observation. After all all the knowledge is established on the human beings 'subjective conclusion. Professor J. Ziman compared the accuracy of the scientific knowledge to the map ‘s proportion to the world. As we know, there is no so big map can reflect the world as the proportion 1: 1, which is just like natural science knowledge can not cover the whole world, because scientists as experienced human beings, undoubtedly, they are incapable of avoiding their limitations. Although they have had a great achievement in the course of the scientific development and they try to reduce the individual factors, their thoughts, their technologies still limit their completely exploring the secrets of nature and giving the purely objective observation.

However, there is no purely objective observation, can we assert that all observation is subjective? Obviously, the first one can not lead to the latter one, if we take deep consideration into it. For example, no one will deny the observation that the earth goes around the sun as the objective one. Although the natural science field can not provide us with the purely objective observation, it still offers us the objective ones. Through the method of measurement and advanced technological facilities, it utmost avoids man- made influence.  

In sum,  if only our human beings exist on the earth, and continue to speculate, never can start the purely objective observation, which is always guided by the observer's expectations and desires. Yet, all the observation would not be subjective, when we try our best to get rid of individual factors. The nature of the observation is depended on when and what we need to do

[ Last edited by staralways on 2005-8-4 at 13:24 ]

禾日因心UID: 174510

hehe 早晨一起来做的事 就是顶自己，大家拍拍呀，做T考去了

abigredUID: 154473

When human beings begin to observe the world around them, their observation is divided into the objective and the subjective. Then there has been much dispute over whether there is purely objective observation or all the observation is subjective. After taking several factors into account, I concede that there is no such thing as purely objective observation, yet I still put some doubt into the assertion that all observation is subjective.

As human beings, we have our own thinking and so much emotion that we look into something, difficultly, without any propensity.这句话似乎有问题，是不是要加hardly without any propensity Based on different experience, desires and expectation, our observation is unconsciously guided by these factors. Purely objective observation is just like the moon in the river, which can never be touched. In the art field, it is hardly that when the observers see the smile of Mona Lisa, they can agree on what kind of the smile really is. When the poets come to see the same river, according to their present moods, the descriptions they make would bring different feelings to others, melancholy or exciting, bitter or delight. Referring to the political realm, it is known to all that one’s remark or statement always represents certain group’s benefit, no matter what the remarks from the disvantaged or the power.句意有歧异 Then concerning the law, the independent trials from the impartial judge still make how去掉 many people suffer from the seemingly purely objective judgments.

   Even the natural science, the most accurate, objective field can not claim that they have purely objective observation. After all all the knowledge is established on the human beings 'subjective conclusion. Professor J. Ziman compared the accuracy of the scientific knowledge to the map ‘s proportion to the world. As we know, there is no so big map can reflect the world as the proportion 1: 1, which is just like natural science knowledge can not cover the whole world, because scientists as experienced human beings, undoubtedly, they are incapable of avoiding their limitations. Although they have had a great achievement in the course of the scientific development and they try to reduce the individual factors, their thoughts, their technologies still limit their completely exploring the secrets of nature and giving the purely objective observation. 嗯，这段很不错，尤其是那个比喻

However, there is no purely objective observation, can we assert that all observation is 加上purely或者其他强调绝对的词比较好subjective?语法上有毛病 Obviously, the first one can not lead to the latter one, if we take deep consideration into it. For example, no one will deny the observation that the earth goes around the sun as the objective one. Although the natural science field can not provide us with the purely objective observation, it still offers us the objective ones. Through the method of measurement and advanced technological facilities, it utmost avoids man- made influence.  

In sum,  if only our human beings exist on the earth, and continue to speculate, never can start the purely objective observation, which is always guided by the observer's expectations and desires. Yet, all the observation would not be subjective, when we try our best to get rid of individual factors. The nature of the observation is depended on when and what we need to do 这句好像没有总结到上面的意义，when???

写得不错啊，呵呵，感觉读起来语气舒缓～～

禾日因心UID: 174510

谢谢小仪的鼓励，还要把文章修改下，继续加油ing :)

staralwaysUID: 193479

"There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer's expectations or desires."

When human beings begin to observe the world around them, their observation is divided into the objective and the subjective. [这句话作为引子，不错。] Then there has been much dispute over whether there is purely objective observation or all the observation is subjective. After taking several factors into account, I concede that there is no such thing as purely objective observation, yet I still put some doubt into the assertion that all observation is subjective.

As human beings, we have our own thinking and so much emotion that we look into something, difficultly [这个词放在这里什么意思？], without any propensity. Based on different experience, desires and expectation, our observation is unconsciously guided by these factors. Purely objective observation is just like the moon in the river, which can never be touched. [这句话不错。] In the art field, it is hardly that when the observers see the smile of Mona Lisa, they can agree on what kind of the smile really is. When the poets come to see the same river, according to their present moods, the descriptions they make would bring different feelings to others, melancholy or exciting, bitter or delight. Referring to the political realm, it is known to all that one remark or statement always represents certain group’s benefit, no matter what the remarks from the disadvantaged or the power.  Then concerning the law, the independent trials from the impartial judge still make how many people suffer from the seemingly purely objective judgments.

Even the natural science, the most accurate, objective field cannot claim that they have purely objective observation. After all all the knowledge is established on the human beings 'subjective conclusion. Professor J. Ziman compared the accuracy of the scientific knowledge to the map’s proportion to the world. As we know, there is no so big map can reflect the world as the proportion 1: 1, which is just like natural science knowledge can not cover the whole world, because scientists as experienced human beings, undoubtedly, they are incapable of avoiding their limitations. Although they have had a great achievement in the course of the scientific development and they try to reduce the individual factors, their thoughts, their technologies still limit their completely exploring the secrets of nature and giving the purely objective observation.

However, there is no purely objective observation, can we assert that all observation is subjective? Obviously, the first one cannot lead to the latter one, if we take deep consideration into it. For example, no one will deny the observation that the earth goes around the sun as the objective one. Although the natural science field cannot provide us with the purely objective observation, it still offers us the objective ones. Through the method of measurement and advanced technological facilities, it utmost avoids man-made influence.

In sum, if only our human beings exist on the earth, and continue to speculate, never can start the purely objective observation, which is always guided by the observer's expectations and desires. Yet, all the observation would not be subjective, when we try our best to get rid of individual factors. The nature of the observation is depended on when and what we need to do.

[文章的论述总体上不错，很流畅，这是很大的一个优点。但是读的过程对于立场句：I concede that there is no such thing as purely objective observation, yet I still put some doubt into the assertion that all observation is subjective，总觉得不太舒服。“承认没有纯客观的观察”、但是“怀疑并不是所有的观察都是主观的”，因为按照文章中的第一句话：When human beings begin to observe the world around them, their observation is divided into the objective and the subjective，那么观察如果不是客观的，就应该是主观的。但是如果“并不是所有的观察都是主观的”->“有一些观察不是主观的”->“并且它们又不是客观的”->then what are they?感觉上是“事实”与“观察”的区别。]

禾日因心UID: 174510

呵呵，睡个午觉起来，就看到star斑斑的修改，说的很有道理呀，体会ing
谢谢star斑斑的修改:)

joythrutearUID: 184670

When human beings begin to observe the world around them, their observation is divided into the objective and the subjective. Then there has been much dispute over whether there is purely objective observation or all the observation is subjective. After taking several factors into account, I concede that there is no such thing as purely objective observation, yet I still put some doubt into the assertion that all observation is subjective.

As human beings, we have our own thinking and so much emotion that we look into something, difficultly, without any propensity. Based on different experience, desires and expectation, our observation is unconsciously guided by these factors. Purely objective observation is just like the moon in the river, which can never be touched. In the art field, it is hardly that when the observers see the smile of Mona Lisa, they can agree on what kind of the smile it really is. When the poets come to see the same river, according to their present moods, the descriptions they make would bring different feelings to others, melancholy or exciting, bitter or delight. Referring to the political realm, it is known to all that one's remark or statement always represents certain group’s benefit, no matter what the remarks from the disadvantaged or the power.  Then concerning the law, the independent trials from the impartial judge still make how(so) many people suffer from the seemingly purely objective judgments.

   Even the natural science, the most accurate, objective field can not claim that they have purely objective observation. After all, all the knowledge is established on the human beings 'subjective conclusion. Professor J. Ziman compared the accuracy of the scientific knowledge to the map ‘s proportion to the world. As we know, there is no so big map can reflect the world as the proportion 1: 1, which is just like natural science knowledge can not cover the whole world, because scientists as experienced human beings, undoubtedly, they are incapable of avoiding their limitations. Although they have had a great achievement in the course of the scientific development and they try to reduce the individual factors, their thoughts, their technologies still limit their completely exploring the secrets of nature and giving the purely objective observation.

However, there is no purely objective observation, can we assert that all observation is subjective? Obviously, the first one can not lead to the latter one, if we take deep consideration into it. For example, no one will deny the observation that the earth goes around the sun as the objective one. Although the natural science field can not provide us with the purely objective observation, it still offers us the objective ones. Through the method of measurement and advanced technological facilities, it utmost avoids man- made influence.  

In sum,  if only our human beings exist on the earth, and continue to speculate, never can start the purely objective observation, which is always guided by the observer's expectations and desires. Yet, all the observation would not be subjective, when we try our best to get rid of individual factors. The nature of the observation is depended on when and what we need to do

禾日因心UID: 174510

谢谢楼上MM的修改 :)

bridgewalkerUID: 208595

题目
There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer’s expectations or desires.

正文
When human beings begin to observe the world around them, their observation is divided into (可以模仿Churchill,加上“two classes,”) the objective and the subjective. Then there has been much dispute over whether there is purely objective observation or all the observation is subjective. After taking several factors into account, I concede that there is no such thing as purely objective observation（有点冗余了）, yet I still put some doubt into the assertion that all observation is subjective.（这个Position句不顺畅哦！你的意思不就是：When concerning the nature of observation, neither objective nor subjective is absolute.跟你后面的立场好像配不上！）

As human beings, we have our own thinking and so much emotion that we look into something, difficultly（?）, without any propensity. Based on different experience（+s?）, desires and expectation, our observation is unconsciously guided by these factors（=them）. Purely objective observation is just like the moon in the river, which can never be touched. In the art field, it is hardly that when the observers see the smile of Mona Lisa, they can agree on what kind of the smile really is. When the poets come to see the same river, according to their present moods, the descriptions they make would bring different feelings to others, melancholy（这也用上了？） or exciting, bitter or delight. Referring to the political realm, it is known to all that one remark or statement always represents certain group’s benefit, no matter what（换whether是否好些？） the remarks from the disadvantaged or the power.  Then concerning the law, the independent trials from the impartial judge still make how（换so可以不？） many people suffer from the seemingly purely（删？） objective judgments.
政治和法律两个例子用得不是很fit！再考虑一下。段末最好一句小结，回应本段TS。
是不是感觉be动词结构的句子和It is … that…用得很频繁？我意识到自己也有这个毛病。
前者用得太多反映了语言能力的不足。我现在尽量想少用be，用纯verb替换。

   Even the natural science, the most accurate, objective field can not claim that they have purely objective observation. After all, all the（删？） knowledge is established on the（删？） human beings 'subjective conclusion.（我承认all knowledge is established on human beings’ conclusion.但不赞同都subjective。） Professor J. Ziman compared the accuracy of the scientific knowledge to the map‘s proportion to the world. As we know, there is no so big map can reflect the world as the proportion 1: 1, which is just like natural science knowledge can not cover the whole world, because scientists as experienced human beings, undoubtedly, they are incapable of avoiding their limitations. （那我要问：既然map是subjective，那它为什么又能准确的导航呢？GPS就更厉害啦！）Although they have had a great achievement in the course of the scientific development and they try to reduce the individual factors, their thoughts, their technologies still limit their completely exploring the secrets of nature and giving the purely objective observation.

However, there is no purely objective observation. Can we assert that all observation is subjective? Obviously, the first one can not lead to the latter one(删), if we take deep consideration into it. For example, no one will deny the observation that the earth goes around the sun as the objective one. Although the natural science field can not provide us with the purely objective observation, it still offers us the objective ones. Through the method of measurement and advanced technological facilities, it utmost avoids man- made influence.这段展开不够！论证无力。

In sum,  if only our human beings exist on the（删） earth, and continue to speculate, never can start the purely objective observation, which is always guided by the observer's expectations and desires. Yet, all the observation would not be subjective, when we try our best to get rid of individual factors. The nature of the observation is depended on when and what we need to do. (这一句简直就是一个新Position！你上面哪有论证？读完我浆糊了！)

禾日因心UID: 174510

汗， 居然被改出了这么多错误，我会认真的思考的。 非常谢谢Bridge的狠拍。
1 那我要问：既然map是subjective，那它为什么又能准确的导航呢？GPS就更厉害啦！
回： subjective的东西并不代表它是错的呀，能准确导航，并不能说明地图就可以以1：1的比例完全精确的反映出整个世界，这毕竟是不可能的。
2 关于结尾，像楼上几位所指出的那样的确是不好，到了后面完全是凑字数的写了句，想不到却是文章受损，以后会注意的。

bridgewalkerUID: 208595

呵呵！+U+U

AlexandraUID: 185174

哇  这么多人看了
我就不发表了  呵呵
加油