繁华已谢，梦重新开始，转战SUB

zhangheng1020UID: 2130513

Originally posted by 安婧 at 2005-11-28 22:49
楼主，看你的菜单，感觉你是湖南的。
看你那么强，感觉你是湘雅的。

据说女人的直觉准，看了你的回答，感觉你是男的。:L:L:L
PS: 菜单？哪里？我买单！

esmeirasUID: 202885

呵呵...~~
上面的图乐死我了..:)

樱桃小丸子/丸丸UID: 2160265

复旦的牛女  俺这小学校 sigh

zhangheng1020UID: 2130513

I was asked so many times by the question like "how can I pretest the USMLE? ... Am I capable of USMLE? " And really be quite glade to hear those emotional proclaim (热血宣言) as "I want to prepare USMLE... I am willing to try...I made up my mind ..." Every time I felt quite excited when seeing those young guys who want to try the “USMLE”. However, the disappointed times that I saw the “bye-bye fact” proved later on is almost as many as the times I moved by those stimulating claims … I can’t remember how many times I saw my friends told me “I wanna give up” or “I will quit”… Saying is much easier than believing__ I won’t suggest my friend choice this tough way anymore, anyway, I will still give me sincerely blessing to those who want to go a little further……

I copied some of my USMLE preparing book for a friend in Beijing.
It is a sys of notes (not textbooks) of "first aids" and "Kaplan" this is the letter I received today. Enjoy......

heng zhang，您好！
  昨晚jc回来了，我看到了他说只是一小部分的书，因为事先有心理准备也就没觉得很可
怕了，不过书确实很多，要看完恐怕真要费很大的气力，我怕等我看完这些书，不变态也要
变得变态了。
今早带了一本诊断学来看，看了前面一点点，感觉还是很有意思的，作者以人为本的原则，在我现在这样一个病人家属的位置来看颇有感触，非常赞同。希望以后在学习时，能多多交流。
再次表示诚挚的谢意！
　　　　　　　　致
礼！
Lb

this is my reply:
what you said is correct!!
You have to be abnormal for this abnormal BT test!
You have to be abnormal for this abnormal BT test!
You have to be abnormal for this abnormal BT test!
You have to be abnormal for this abnormal BT test!
You have to be abnormal for this abnormal BT test!
You have to be abnormal for this abnormal BT test!
You have to be abnormal for this abnormal BT test!
变态中.......

Ok, no more kidding. Let me take this email for example, we do have to face “lots pains”, we might lose many chance at the same time: job, high income, friends commutation… now I won’t suggest any of my friends try the USMLE anymore… It is really be an icy road as what the Xatrixer said before. One should ask oneself a question before digging in__“what kind of person I want to be?” and learn to listen ones heart. It is not worthy for those who just want the higher income and better social position, you can gain them all in China with much less effect. But to those who really know what he is expecting and who is willing to gain with pain, my only suggestion is: “follow your heart, hold your courage and never ever give up.’
There is no catholicon万灵药 for one’s struggling. And I do hold the respect to those who give up the USMLE trying in the halfway___they are the wiser. But please let me hold the some respect to those climber, they might be a loser, but they are not a quitter…

all in analyze to those bath-style writing, “know what you really want, and go for it”
later
yours zhangheng1020

樱桃小丸子/丸丸UID: 2160265

呵呵 我就是男的

樱桃小丸子/丸丸UID: 2160265

congrtulations

樱桃小丸子/丸丸UID: 2160265

buwanle

樱桃小丸子/丸丸UID: 2160265

今天真变态

樱桃小丸子/丸丸UID: 2160265

115.The following appeared in a clothing industry trade journal in the country of Sartoria.

"A popular fashion magazine recently conducted a survey of consumers' opinions about clothing prices, using prepaid mailing envelopes. Eighty-nine percent of the approximately 20,000 respondents reported that they were either "dissatisfied" or "very dissatisfied" with current clothing prices. The large number of responses indicates that the Sartorian clothing industry is at risk. Given the survey results, clothing manufacturers must find a way to reduce prices in order to keep their existing customers and maintain their businesses."

一本流行的时尚杂志最近组织了一次有关消费者对服装价格的意见的调查，调查使用了预付邮资的信封。大约20000名回应者中有89％报告说他们对于当前服装价格是"不满意"或是"非常不满意"的。巨大的回应数量表明Sartoria的服装工业正面临危险。根据调查结果，服装生产商必须设法降低价格来保持他们现有的消费者并维持他们的业务。

       The topic claimed that Sartorian clothing industry should reduce prices for the sake of keeping their market share and maintaining their business. To support the conclusion, the result of the survey was cited. However, after careful and thorough consideration, the argument is rather dubious.   
       In the first place, the arguer cannot ensure that the result of survey that the argument rests on is trustworthy. On one hand, the argument provides no evidence that the survey is statistically reliable. Perhaps the subjects are circumscribed to a certain area. So it is unable to represent the whole consumers of the country. On the other hand, the survey should be conducted under scientific process. In other words, the surveyors should be neutral and make sure that the subjects are the selective samples. In addition, the data of 20,000 respondents lends no credible support to the conclusion. Maybe the respondents only account for a small percent of the whole subjects. So the data make no sense in statistics. Any of scenarios, if true, will serve to deeply undermine the conclusion.        
Even assuming the reliability of the survey’s result is undeniable, whether the Sartorian clothing industry is at risk remains a question. As we know, the consumers choose to buy one clothes rather than another based on many factor such as the style, the raw materials, the brand and so on, whereas the price only accounts for one of these factors. Although consumers are dissatisfied with the current clothing prices Perhaps consumers are more willing to buy more clothes than ever regarding of the prices. In this case, the Sartorian clothing industry will be more prosperous than ever before, let alone in dilemma.  
Moreover, the arguer fails to consider other possible alternatives that may be better solve the problems. As we know, the development of industry is closely linked to the availability of propaganda and human resource in useful forms. Maybe consumers know little about the products of clothing manufacturers in Sartorian, so it will be wiser to broadcast the products through advertisement rather than reducing prices. Also the manufacturers should employ more proficient workers other than neophyte or apprentice. Only considering other possible methods thoroughly, could the arguer convincingly lead to the conclusion.
In sum, the conclusion is neither pervasive nor well--present. To better support the conclusion, the arguer should provide more and clear evidence about the reliability of the study and the fact that the clothing industry is actually at risks.  What’s more, the arguer should consider other possible alternatives thoroughly.

樱桃小丸子/丸丸UID: 2160265

以后我就在这里发我作文了

樱桃小丸子/丸丸UID: 2160265

Originally posted by 樱桃小丸子/丸丸 at 2005-11-29 13:20
以后我就在这里发我作文了

樱桃小丸子/丸丸UID: 2160265

170.For the past five years, consumers in California have been willing to pay twice as much for oysters from the northeastern Atlantic Coast as for Gulf Coast oysters. This trend began shortly after harmful bacteria were found in a few raw Gulf Coast oysters. But scientists have now devised a process for killing the bacteria. Once consumers are made aware of the increased safety of Gulf Coast oysters, they are likely to be willing to pay as much for Gulf Coast as for northeastern Atlantic Coast oysters, and greater profits for Gulf Coast oyster producers will follow.
过去五年中，加州的消费者愿意花比Gulf Coast牡蛎贵一倍的价格来购买东北地区的Atlantic Coast牡蛎。这种趋势发生在一些Gulf Coast生牡蛎被查出含有有害细菌之后。但科学家现在已经设计了一套杀灭这些细菌的工艺。一旦消费者发觉Gulf Coast牡蛎的安全性提高了，他们将会愿意付出和东北的Atlantic Coast牡蛎同样的价格来购买它，并为Gulf Coast牡蛎的经营者带来更大的利润。


Before the arguer coming to the conclusion that Gulf Coast oyster (GC) producers will gain greater profits by adopting the process for killing the bacteria, he or she should provide sufficient evidence. In fact, based on a series of unwarranted assumption, the argument is neither persuasive nor reliable.
                 In the first place, the arguer fails to consider other possible reasons that may account for the fact that the consumers are more willing to buy northeastern Atlantic Coast oysters (AC). As we all know, people are inclined to buy one thing rather than another due to many aspects. Perhaps AC oysters have more desirable taste and relatively higher nutrition. Or perhaps the appearance of AC oysters is more appealing compared to GC oysters. So it maybe not such case that the GC oyster will be popular among people by simply killing the bacteria. Therefore, the arguer should consider thoroughly and thoughtfully before hastily leading to the conclusion.
                 Moreover, even the scientists have devised a process for killing the bacteria, whether the process can be applied to the GC oysters producers is open to doubt. Common sense and experiences tell us that the success in science cannot equal to the similar case in the practical use. Maybe the process can make the oysters less favorable, or maybe add new bacteria to the oysters. In addition, maybe the process is so complicated that few workers are able to understand the basic principles, let alone about operating. Without ample description about the process, the arguer cannot convincingly assume that the process is available.   
               Finally, even if the above assumptions are true, the arguer cannot conclude that the GC producers will gain greater profits. As we all know, profit is determined by both the income and cost. The enlargement of employees and the extra retraining charge will inevitably increase the expense of the producers. Thus whether the producers can make both ends meet or not remains a question, let alone about gaining profit.
              :kiss:In sum, the argument is neither persuasive nor reliable. The arguer should provide sufficient evidence to support the assumption. Only with more clear evidence, could this argument be credible and well-present:handshake:kiss:

[ Last edited by 樱桃小丸子/丸丸 on 2005-11-29 at 21:15 ]

candypan31UID: 2103116

加油

zhangheng1020UID: 2130513

起来

昨天严重放纵，做的这个，看看我的黑色幽默

[ Last edited by zhangheng1020 on 2005-11-30 at 11:15 ]

tony.zijianUID: 2113638

坚持不懈的人啊，我也在绝望中奋起，犹豫中前进，一把鼻涕一把眼泪的看书阿