issue51 请大家狂拍吧！谢谢啦~ 终于写完了，很高兴。(sally)

superficialUID: 2151788

ＩＳＳＵＥ　超级高频，大家务必认真对待！！
51"Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student."

outline:
1.从effective入手，分析如果实现了差别化教育是否一定会有效。从经济学的角度来说，无疑成本太高，不可取
2.教育的目的在于learning to know, learning to do, learning to get together and learning to be，对于前两点，这种教育方式基本可以做到，但是存在一定的问题，比如说按学生的兴趣去做是否会使学生受到的教育全面；而对于后两点，学习如何相处和如何做人来讲，这样的教育方式显然存在着不足。
3.有保留的反对，指出随着进步，有可能实现低成本的差别化教育，起码通过今天互联网的蓬勃发展我们就可以展望其前景。而且随着人们对需求的个性化，差别化的教育必然应该实现。

Education, which defined as an act or process of obtaining the knowledge or skill, is a foundation of our society to develope in the longrun. In this topic, the speaker insists that specific designation for individual is the only way for the education to meet their needs and interests. I concede that specilization would contribute to meet students' curiosity so as to promote them to learn, yet only through this way it canont be treated as effective so arbitrary. Effectiveness involves not only the final result of the educating but the process, meanwhile wheather students educated by this way get sound education is questionable.

To begin with, one reason for my disagreement with the speaker is that differentiate education will result in ineffective as a contrary. In economics, we defined effectiveness as ratio of the final output to the indeed input. If we evaluate effective in such meaning, the oucome will be obvious because a specifically designed program costs a lot and accordingly the  output that transmition of knowledge from one to another not valued so much. Consider the general investigation of a nation, a main reason that it can not hold frequently is the cost, including money, time and human resource. How can we collect information from every individual and refresh them to better serve his continuouse changing interest under acceptable cost? If we cannot resolve that problem, personal education will be just a bunkum.

Secondly, as UNESCO recommended, the purpose of education is learning to know, learning to do, learning to get together and learning to be. For the first level, to know. There is an old saying goes " interests are the best teacher", admittedly, students can do better in the realm that they do like. But if they would receive a sound education merely by accepting the knowledge that they like is a query. Some basic subjects, for instance, mathematics, are disgusted by many children and if they could make choice they will be surely get rid of them. Thus, they will be confined as donging a lot of things without that basic tool. And for getting together even learning to be, how can a child learn cooperate, leadership,teamworkand interpersonal skills when they focus on things interested them? How can a child distinguish the moral education and the formal education and get concious of what kind of person they should learn to be? As argued above, only meeting the individual needs will not fulfill these purpose, not mentioned to be effective.

Based on these analysis, we can draw a conclusion that specifically designed program is not feasible at least under the condition nowadays. Even though as the society developed, maybe somedays it will come true. People today can get information more easily than whenever through internet, which is perfected as time go on. Moreover, as differentiation and individualization is mentioned more frequently, various needs of people are considered more. Naturally, education could be treated individually, specification would not only benefit educatee but produce profits as long as be provided as product.

In sum, the speaker could not persuade us that meet individual needs and interests of each one is effective, perhaps he should make an overall plan for that style of education which will conquer flaws we facing now. However, individulization is a trend, sooner or later, it will be realized.

[ Last edited by superficial on 2005-12-22 at 00:24 ]

gtrandUID: 2156108

51"Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student."

outline:
1.从effective入手，分析如果实现了差别化教育是否一定会有效。从经济学的角度来说，无疑成本太高，不可取
2.教育的目的在于learning to know, learning to do, learning to get together and learning to be，对于前两点，这种教育方式基本可以做到，但是存在一定的问题，比如说按学生的兴趣去做是否会使学生受到的教育全面；而对于后两点，学习如何相处和如何做人来讲，这样的教育方式显然存在着不足。
3.有保留的反对，指出随着进步，有可能实现低成本的差别化教育，起码通过今天互联网的蓬勃发展我们就可以展望其前景。而且随着人们对需求的个性化，差别化的教育必然应该实现。

Education, which isdefined as an act or process of obtaining the knowledge or skill,教育还需要下定义吗？是否已模板化了？哈哈 is a foundation of in the longrun. In this topic, the speaker insists that specific designationdesigns for individuals is the only effectiveway for the education to meet their needs and interests. I concede that specilization would contribute to meet students' individual curiosity so as to promote them to learn, yet only through this way it canont be treated as effective so arbitrary this is not necessarily the only, or even an, effective way. Effectiveness involves not only Whether a particular way of education is effective or not depends on not onlythe final result of the educating but the process,. meanwhile wheather students educated by this way get sound education is questionable.前面已表示过怀疑了，再说显得重复。

To begin with, one reason for my disagreement with the speaker is that differentiated education will actuallyresult in ineffectiveness as a contrary没有这种说法. In economics, we defineddefine effectiveness as theratio of the final output to the indeed input没听说过indeed input. If we evaluate effectiveness in such meaning, the oucome will be obvious because a specifically designed program costs a lot and accordingly the  output, thatthe transmition of knowledge from one to another, isnot valued so muchvery cost-effective.. Consider the general investigation of a nation, a main reason that it can not hold be heldfrequently is the cost it involves, including money, time and human resource. How can we collect information from every individual and refresh them to better serve his continuouse changing interest under acceptable cost? If we cannot resolve that problem, personal education will be just a bunkum.

Secondly, as UNESCO recommendeds, the purpose of education is learning to know, learning to do, learning to get together and learning to be. For the first level, to know. There Regarding the first purpose of education, or learning to know, there is an old saying goes " interests are the best teacher",. admittedly, students can do better in the realm that they do like., But if but whetherthey would receive a sound education merely by accepting the knowledge that they like is a query. Some basic subjects, for instance, mathematics, are disgusted dislikedby many children and if they could make choice they will be surely get rid of them. Thus, they will be confined as to donging a lot of things without that basic tool. And for getting together even learning to be, how can a child learn cooperatecooperation, leadership,teamworkand interpersonal skills when they he or she just focusfocuses on things interested interestingthemhim or her? How can a child distinguish the moral education and the formal education and get concious of whatdecide what kind of person they should learn to bemoral education与formal education并无冲突，因此也不存在distinguish的问题? As argued above, only meeting the individual needs will not fulfill these purpose, not mentioned to be effective.

Based on these analysis, we can draw a conclusion that specifically designed program is not feasible at least under the condition nowadays. Even though as the society developed, maybe somedays it will come trueBut as the society develops, maybe somedays such kinds of programs would be realistic. 从上下文来看，作者是想表达转折的意思，但even though引导的是让步。. People today can get information more easily than wheneverever before through internet, which is perfected as time goes on. Moreover, as differentiation and individualization is mentioned more frequently, variousindividual needs of people are considered more.getting more and more attention. Naturally, education could be treated individually, and specification would not only benefit educatee but produce profits as long as be provided as product.

In sum, the speaker could not persuade us that tomeet individual needs and interests of each one is effectivethe only effective way of education,. perhaps he should make an overall plan for that style of education which will conquer flaws we facing now. 不通However, individulizationthe need for more specifically designed education is on the rise, is a trend, andsooner or later, it will be realized.as technology advances, such kind of education might someday become a common practice.原话说得有点绝对。

观点独到，深刻，可惜没有能够完全表达出来。建议以尽量准确的方式来表达自己的思想，避免辞不达意，甚至因辞而害意。毕竟写作主要考察思考能力，语言只是载体，朴实一点、简单一点无伤大雅。另外，最后一段有点像Argument的结尾，最好修改一下。

[ Last edited by gtrand on 2005-12-22 at 03:28 ]

sallyxinduUID: 2131253

superficial的观点真的很独特，非常好，楼上gtrand的评论也很到位，觉得基本上该说的都说到了，我就不再修改了．呵呵，不好意思偷懒了:$
另外，没看到你的阿狗

[ Last edited by sallyxindu on 2005-12-22 at 17:13 ]

superficialUID: 2151788

TO gtrand & sally:
我是看了POOH的分析帖子才这么总结的，要说到我自己的观点，那真是经常幼稚的可笑呢~：）

TO sally:
组长，我现在写issue有点困难，所以好几次都没有写阿狗了，见谅啊。我的水平上去了，就会写的，可以吗？