issue38 书籍ＶＳ电视，有拍定回，留连接(sally)

sallyxinduUID: 2131253

38"In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books."

提纲
1，电视的优点：电视提供的信息更生动，特别是对于及时发生的事件比书籍记录更有冲击力．举例：印度洋海啸，奥运会等．所以，电视在提供一定量信息的同时也增添了娱乐

2，电视的缺点：但是，电视的播放有时间限制，而且，内容不一定是我们想要的，也不能随时随地学习．举例：文学研究者不一定能在他们需要的时候在电视上得到相关的信息；到贫困地方考察的学者（没有电视的地方）不能继续通过电视学习或获得信息

3，书籍的优点：书籍可以避免以上电视的缺点，它更有利于深入的学术研究，因为书本的记载相对详细而电视相对简略，举例：书本记载的圣经比电视上对圣经的评述详细．而且，电视信息往往来源于书本，举例：电影很多根据小说拍摄

With the blistering pace of technological development, televisions have played an important role in people’s daily life. Throught the media coverage in TV, people are exposed to more information, which is more vivid and has greater impact on people’s seeing that that of books. With regard to this advantage of televisions over books. The idea that televisions shoud have superseded books totally. From my perspective, however, books still preponderate over televisions in some aspect. Therefore, it’s too arbitrary to judge whether TVs or books should be in the dominating position. Rather, we should view this issue in an all-sided way.

In the first place, televisions is a telecommunication system for broadcasting and receiving moving pictures and sound over a distance, referring to almost all aspcets of. In this sense, it cannot be denied that TVs offer lively picturesque information and this in turn strongly impinges upon people’s feeling, especially the timely-generant events. For instance, with the help of televisions, people have the access to “feeling” the miserable scene of tsunami of Indian Ocean shortly before, in virtue of media coverage from television, people stand more chance to know the detailed information about the great Olympic games in 2004 in Athens. Admittedly, the reports about the  aforementioned events are all available in books after happening, it’s without doubt that it’s television rather than books that make it possible to know these events at the very moments of happening. As a result, telesions not only furnish us with an “eye” to see the events, but also an “ear” to hear events and thus make information more easily to be understood and memorized.

Nevertheless,the television inevitablely has some demerits which bear the immediate interest to its inferiority in certain cercumstances. Firstly, TV programmes are within the confines of the broadcasting time limit. Say, if children programs are planned to be played in the morning, children could not watch them in the afternoon when time pops up at their convenience. In a not dissimilar way, sports fans could not watch sports reports in the morning if they are schedualed to be broadcasted in the evening. In addition, information from television call for the indispensable need of a television. Under such a circumstance, this requirement sharply diminishes the population of TV-watchers in that televisions are not reachable in some places or at some times. An illuminating example involves the impoverished places where people cannot afford televisions. In these places, of course, books turn out to be the main information sourse as opposed to televisions. Having been informed of TV’s limitation in terms of time and place, it’s preposterous to declare that books should be substituted by televisions unconditionally.

When it comes to books, however, it’s undeniable that people could fall back on books to solve the defects of TVs as discussed above. People can read books in the morning, in the afternoon or any other time at their will. The rich can read books, the poor can read books also. In this sense, books are comparatively more easily to be obtained. What’s more, upon on a careful comparison, we could see that information in books are more profound than that in TVs. Take Bible for example, the book of Bible contains every piece of detailed information while TV narratation,like “Bible travel” touches on only the important items. Deep down, this is nowhere more true than on the issue that some polts in teleplay are originated from novels in the form of books. In this aspect, it’s clear that books are the information source for TV programmes and therefore television are as important as televisions or even more important.

In the final analysis. Books and television are like the left and right hands of a person, only by making full use of both of them could we do things smoothly. In a word, neither of them should be discarded or belittled and it’s meanlingless to determine which has more positive bearings on people’s life.

ldc792001UID: 2134601

issue38 书籍ＶＳ电视，有拍定回，留连接(sally)

38"In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books."

提纲
1，电视的优点：电视提供的信息更生动，特别是对于及时发生的事件比书籍记录更有冲击力．举例：印度洋海啸，奥运会等．所以，电视在提供一定量信息的同时也增添了娱乐

2，电视的缺点：但是，电视的播放有时间限制，而且，内容不一定是我们想要的，也不能随时随地学习．举例：文学研究者不一定能在他们需要的时候在电视上得到相关的信息；到贫困地方考察的学者（没有电视的地方）不能继续通过电视学习或获得信息

3，书籍的优点：书籍可以避免以上电视的缺点，它更有利于深入的学术研究，因为书本的记载相对详细而电视相对简略，举例：书本记载的圣经比电视上对圣经的评述详细．而且，电视信息往往来源于书本，举例：电影很多根据小说拍摄

光看提纲的话，说了电视的优缺点，只说了书的优点，为什么不说书的缺点呢？

With the blistering pace of technological development, televisions have played an important role in people’s daily life. Throught（Through） the media coverage in TV, people are exposed to more information, which is more vivid and has greater impact on people’s seeing that(than) that of books. With regard to this advantage of televisions over books(这个不是完整的句子啊). The idea that televisions shoud（should） have superseded books totally. From my perspective, however, books still preponderate over televisions in some aspect（aspects）. Therefore, it’s too arbitrary to judge whether TVs or books should be （缺宾语）in the dominating position. Rather, we should view this issue in an all-sided way. （开头还算中规中距，存在个别小问题）

In the first place, televisions is（用televisions后怎么还用is） a telecommunication system for broadcasting and receiving moving pictures and sound over a distance, referring to almost all aspcets（aspects） of（这句话作开头不好，第一段这么重要的位置还是放主题句为好，此外对电视的定义似乎并不准确）. In this sense, it cannot be denied that TVs offer lively picturesque information and this in turn strongly impinges upon people’s feeling（emotion）, especially the timely-generant events. For instance, with the help of televisions, people have the access to “feeling” the miserable scene of tsunami of Indian Ocean（Indian Ocean tsunami ）shortly before, in virtue of media coverage from television, people stand more chance to know the detailed information about the great Olympic games in 2004 in Athens. Admittedly, the reports about the  aforementioned events are all available in books after happening, it’s without doubt that it’s television rather than books that make it possible to know these events at the very moments of happening. As a result, telesions not only furnish us with an “eye” to see the events, but also an “ear” to hear events and thus make information more easily to be understood and memorized.

Nevertheless, the television inevitablely(inevitably) has some demerits which bear the immediate interest to its inferiority in certain circumstances(circumstances). Firstly, TV programmes (programs) are within the confines of the broadcasting time limit. Say, if children programs are planned to be played in the morning, children could not watch them in the afternoon when time pops up at their convenience. In a not dissimilar way, sports fans could not watch sports reports in the morning if they are schedualed to be broadcasted in the evening. In addition, information from television call for the indispensable need of a television. Under such a circumstance, this requirement sharply diminishes the population of TV-watchers in that televisions are not reachable in some places or at some times(这点说的很好). An illuminating example involves the impoverished places where people cannot afford televisions. In these places, of course, books turn out to be the main information sourse（source） as opposed to televisions. Having been informed of TV’s limitation in terms of time and place, it’s preposterous to declare that books should be substituted by televisions unconditionally.

When it comes to books, however, it’s undeniable that people could fall back on books to solve the defects of TVs as discussed above. People can read books in the morning, in the afternoon or any other time at their will. The rich can read books, the poor can read books also（The rich can read books, so can the poor）. In this sense, books are comparatively more easily to be obtained. What’s more, upon on a careful comparison, we could see that information in books are (is
)more profound than that in TVs. Take Bible for example, the book of Bible contains every piece of detailed information while TV narratation, like “Bible travel” touches on only the important items. Deep down, this is nowhere more true than on the issue that some polts in teleplay are originated from novels in the form of books. In this aspect, it’s clear that books are the information source for TV programmes(programs) and therefore television are as important as televisions or even more important.(这段说了好多书的优点，句与句之间欠缺了一些连接代词，比如what’ more   In addition 等等)

In the final analysis. Books and television are like the left and right hands of a person, only by making full use of both of them could we do things smoothly. In a word, neither of them should be discarded or belittled and it’s meanlingless（insignificance） to determine which has more positive bearings on people’s life.

留下我的链接
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=401890&extra=

xinxinzi0719UID: 182812

38"In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books."

提纲
1，电视的优点：电视提供的信息更生动，特别是对于及时发生的事件比书籍记录更有冲击力．举例：印度洋海啸，奥运会等．所以，电视在提供一定量信息的同时也增添了娱乐

2，电视的缺点：但是，电视的播放有时间限制，而且，内容不一定是我们想要的，也不能随时随地学习．举例：文学研究者不一定能在他们需要的时候在电视上得到相关的信息；到贫困地方考察的学者（没有电视的地方）不能继续通过电视学习或获得信息

3，书籍的优点：书籍可以避免以上电视的缺点，它更有利于深入的学术研究，因为书本的记载相对详细而电视相对简略，举例：书本记载的圣经比电视上对圣经的评述详细．而且，电视信息往往来源于书本，举例：电影很多根据小说拍摄

With the blistering pace of technological development, televisions have played an important role in people’s daily life. Thought the media coverage in TV, people are exposed to more information, which is more vivid and has greater impact on people’s seeing that that of books（seeing that that of books什么意思呢）. With regard to this advantage of televisions over books（语法明显错误啊 In this aspect television holds certain advantage over books ）. The idea that televisions should have superseded(没有必要用完成时 直接用一般时supersede) books totally. From my perspective, however, books still preponderate over televisions in some aspect. Therefore, it’s too arbitrary to judge whether TVs or books should be in the dominating position. Rather, we should view this issue in an all-sided way. (论点是不能一概而论 平衡的观点)
In the first place, televisions is a(简单语法错误啊 television is a )  telecommunication system for broadcasting and receiving moving pictures and sound over a distance, referring to almost all aspects of. In this sense, it cannot be denied that TVs offer lively picturesque information and this in turn strongly impinges upon people’s feeling, especially the timely-generate（timely-generate 实时性？？有这个词么） events. For instance, with the help of televisions, people have the access to “feeling” the miserable scene of tsunami of Indian Ocean shortly before, in virtue of media coverage from television, people stand more chance to know the detailed information about the great Olympic games in 2004 in Athens. Admittedly, the reports about the aforementioned events are all available in books after happening, it’s without doubt that it’s television rather than books that make it possible to know these events at the very moments of happening. As a result, televisions not only furnish us with an “eye” to see the events, but also an “ear” to hear events and thus make information more easily to be understood and memorized.（段尾总结性的语言画龙点睛 更好的解释了以前的例子 但是为什么不把电视能传播实时性的知识这点也点出来呢 televisions not only furnish us with an eye to see the previous and latest events…..）（还有既然你是比较说电视的优点 那么比较体-书籍 也要写出对比的不足吧）

Nevertheless, the television inevitablely has some demerits which bear the immediate interest to its inferiority in certain circumstances. Firstly, TV programmes are within the confines of the broadcasting time limit. Say, if children programs are planned to be played in the morning, children could not watch them in the afternoon when time pops up at their convenience. In a not dissimilar way, sports fans could not watch sports reports in the morning if they are scheduled to be broadcasted in the evening. In addition, information from television calls for the indispensable need of a television. Under such a (a 除掉)circumstance, this requirement sharply diminishes the population of TV-watchers in that televisions are not reachable in some places or at some times. An illuminating example involves the impoverished places where people cannot afford televisions. In these places, of course, books turn out to be the main information source as opposed （opposed 更多的是强调反对 用rather than ）to televisions. Having been informed of TV’s limitation in terms of time and place, it’s preposterous to declare that books should be substituted by televisions unconditionally.

When it comes to books, however, it’s undeniable that people could fall back on books to solve the defects of TVs as discussed above. People can read books in the morning, in the afternoon or any other time at their will. The rich can read books, the poor can read books also. In this sense, books are comparatively more easily to be obtained. What’s more, upon on a careful comparison, we could see that information in books is more profound than that in TVs. Take Bible for example, the book of Bible contains every piece of detailed information while TV narration, like “Bible travel” touches on only the important items. （例子并不充分 不能很好的说明 profound 这一点 例子主要说的是 complete 完整）Deep down, this is nowhere more truely than on the issue that some plots in teleplay are originated from novels in the form of books. In this aspect, it’s clear that books are the information source for TV programmes and therefore television are as important as televisions or even more important.

In the final analysis. Books and television are like the left and right hands of a person; only by making full use of both of them could we do things smoothly. In a word, neither of them should be discarded or belittled and it’s meaningless to determine which has more positive bearings on people’s life.
（提一点小的疑问阿既然你的全文的基调是很难说电视和书籍谁重要 你全文的论述方式都是比较论述 那么如果你在每一段都用一两句话把对方的不足说一下 不是能使你的观点更好么）