issue87 BaXia小组第11次- 猫猫~~最长了，哎

黑崎猫猫UID: 209414

1、inquiry包括三个过程
产生疑问----调查 研究----得出结论

2、 新手更容易对一些看似已有答案的东西产生疑问，就像孩童才会问出“为何1+1=2这类问题，而大人往往不会去思考，而疑问往往是创造的开端
新手往往可以跳出旧有思路和经验的拘泥，开辟新天地
expert被前人经验蒙蔽
  伽利略，莱特兄弟
3、但是在涉及到一些专业问题研究时或者是具体操作（比如科学试验，对现场的纪录和明察秋毫，对细节的注意，和由此产生的一些有益的联想），显然专家们更熟练和具有专业素养，有更全面的专业知识，精雕细琢的专业思考回路，更熟练的操作技能
专家经验丰富，前人积累的知识往往有一定的合理性，看问题比新手更深入、深刻、考虑全面

4、从得出结论方面来说，面对同样的数据，新手大胆创新，dare to提出大胆的假设，可能会得出令人震惊的结论，专家则相对谨慎，各有优点，应互相合作

I fundamentally agree with the speaker's assertion that the beginner is more likely to make important discoveries than experts. But when considering the ordinary processes of inquiry, I shall admit that experts might have great influence on practice.

Based on the custom of people doing research, almost all the fields of inquiry could be detached to three processes: asking question, doing research and experiments, then find the result. I would demonstrate my point from each respective process.

Firstly, most of time, it is more easy for the beginner to have questions to things which might be considered common sense or kid stuff by experts. While as we all know, only kids ask why one adds one is two, experts, when they meet appeared superficial problems, they are more likely to be apt to the answers just in the head than to have a serious thinking to the problem. However, just those childish questions might be the beginning of a period.

Otherwise, questions are always the beginning of innovation, an extension of old knowledge. For example, in the year of 1589, as a 25 years old young professor of mathematics, Galileo Galilei, a famous Italian astronomer and scientist later, demonstrated Aristotle's erroneous claim that the speed of fall depends on a object's weight by throwing two different balls to the earth from a tower, conceded that all objects fall towards the earth with the same acceleration, regardless of their weight, size, or shape. There are so many famous scientists at that time are the supporter of Aristotle but none of them had a try to demonstrate whose theory by merely practical experiment.

Brother Wright's success in inventing the first practical airplane is another support to my view. Although many scientist had definitely concluded that no one can fly in the sky for the imperfect fuel, Wilbur and Orville Wright insisted on their childhood dream that to flying in the sky, and successfully invented the first airplane which can flied one hour in the air. What should be paid more attention is they only graduated from high school.

However, when we consider the practical experiments, we should admit that expert's abundant professional knowledge and chronically accumulated experiences would be great advantages for the research. The knowledge and experiences would help them to detect details and small differences which could be missed in the inquiry. The expert's professional thought, completely studied knowledge, practiced operation would quickly lead to the results. Most of time, those abilities help expert get a profound and thorough view to what they inquire. The beginner should have to finish several basic courses to achieve the same level. On the contrary, expert's experiences would to some degree counteract their lace in innovation.

The last, compared to the expert's caution, the beginner dare to bring out astonishing opinions. Both two attitudes are the necessary factors for the success of research. So cooperation of novice and expert might lead to the eventually success.

In sum, I concede both the beginner and expert are likely to make important discoveries. If they cooperate with each other, the research is more likely to approach the truth.

michelle1021UID: 195011

I fundamentally agree with the speaker's assertion that the beginner is more likely to make important discoveries than experts. But when considering the ordinary processes of inquiry, I shall admit that experts might have great influence on practice.

Based on the custom of people doing research, almost all the fields of inquiry could be detached to three processes: asking question, doing research and experiments, then find the result. I would demonstrate my point from each respective process.这段可以和第一段和起来

Firstly, most of time, it is more easyeasier for the beginner to have questions to things which might be considered common sense or kid stuff by experts. While as we all know, only kids ask why one adds one is two我觉得不只孩子会问吧,1+1=2不是被很多数学家研究么?, experts, when they meet appeared superficial problems, they are more likely to be aptapted to the answers just in the head than to have a serious thinking to the problem. However, just those childish questions might be the beginning of a period.

Otherwise, questions are always the beginning of innovation, an extension of old knowledge. For example, in the year of 1589, as a 25 years old young professor of mathematics我觉得既然25岁的加里略已经是professor了,那他就不算是个初学者, Galileo Galilei, a famous Italian astronomer and scientist later, demonstrated Aristotle's erroneous claim that the speed of fall depends on a object's weight by throwing two different balls to the earth from a tower, conceded that all objects fall towards the earth with the same acceleration, regardless of their weight, size, or shape. There are so many famous scientists at that time are the supporter of Aristotle but none of them had a try to demonstrate whose theory by merely practical experiment.

Brother Wright's success in inventing the first practical airplane is another support to my view. Although many scientist had definitely concluded that no one can fly in the sky for the imperfect fuel, Wilbur and Orville Wright insisted on their childhood dream that to flying in the sky, and successfully invented the first airplane which can flied one hour in the air. What should be paid more attention is they only graduated from high school.这个例子蛮好

However, when we consider the practical experiments, we should admit that expert's abundant professional knowledge and chronically accumulated experiences would be great advantages for the research. The knowledge and experiences would help them to detect details and small differences which could be missed in the inquiry. The expert's professional thought, completely studied knowledge, practiced operation would quickly lead to the results. Most of time, those abilities help expert get a profound and thorough view to what they inquire. The beginner should have to finish several basic courses to achieve the same level. On the contrary, expert's experiences would to some degree counteract their lace in innovation.我觉得这里可以举一两个具体例子说明

The last, compared to the expert's caution, the beginner dare to bring out astonishing opinions. Both two attitudes are the necessary factors for the success of research. So cooperation of novice and expert might lead to the eventually success.

In sum, I concede both the beginner and expert are likely to make important discoveries. If they cooperate with each other, the research is more likely to approach the truth. 我觉得最后两段可以合并一下

我觉得思路是对的,但是举的例子有些不是很恰当:)