issue29 名人隐私，限时．回拍留连接(sally)

sallyxinduUID: 2131253

TOPIC：ISSUE 29 - "Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested in their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy."
WORDS：663          TIME：0:45:00          DATE：2006-2-27
１，利用隐私引起被关注，提高知名度
２，人们过度关注隐私会导致不关心事物本身
３，作为公众人物该作好隐私暴光的准备，并尽量作好带头作用．

With regard to people's inborn nature of curiosity, it is not surprising that the mass would be interested in others' private affairs, though immoral it is sometimes. Nevertheless, public figures, by definition a group of people who are focii of the public,are existing to be exposed to the populace's eys. In this sense, some hopeful and high-flying people take this advantage so as to be the focus of spotlights while other already-public figures consider it to be painfulness in that they could not even own their basic privacy and live the simple life. Even though, famous figures, as they have chosten to be public, should bear in mind that their success of pupularity may at the expense of their privacy sometimes.

With the blistering pace of developmental media industry, our world is becoming "smaller" and therefore many ordinary people have the opportunity to know what they are interested. Under such a circumstance, some foxy people make up certain seemmingly striking news in order to arrest others’ attention. For example, lace news, which concerns private life of actors and other publich people, in terms of their sex life in most situation, are so overwheming that they even become the poise in actors’ claiming to be famous. Due to the uniqueness and abnormality of lace news, the public are more interested in them than regular news. Thus, some ambitious people coin or even fabricate this kind of lace news as a vehicle to expose to others .When it comes to the concrete instances in this point, from Lindsay's co-called marriage with her former boyfriend to French dancer Kisody Rices' feigned claim that he was a gay, all of them are later proved to be effective stimulus through which they stand more chance to be paid attention upon by public. Undoubtedly, a certain number of prospective public figures expect others to be interested in their private lives and thus enhance their popularity.

Even though populace’s interesting in public figures’ privacy adds bullets to celebs’ fight toward being more famous, it is without doubt that privacy, more often than not, will veil people's eys,or distract people's heed from careers of these famous people to their private lives, which will eventually turn out to be a disaster to the society. Take American's president election for example, if people are too much obsessed with candidates' privacy, say, sex inclination, faith of religion and so forth, which have nothing to do with their election, their emphasis on the candidates' capability of serving as a president will be undermined. Consequently, they could not make the decision equally and reasoningly. In this sense, we know that public figures could fall back on privacy as a means to be known but they should not adopt it as a resort to win success in the comptition with others.

Deep down, in light of the inevitability of famous people's exposing to public, well-known characters should be ready that they cannot live a simple and private life as the ordinary people do. An striking example involves Thomas Jefferson's sex relation with Sally Heming. Consider, if Jefferson is no president, this kind of privacy is too commonplace to be mentioned, however, since he is the president, almost all of his behaviors are connected with the public and as a result, his sex life becomes people's topic in daily chat. To be an effective and able public figure,however, they should not be influenced too much by these disturbances from outside but conduct everything according to their principles. Meanwhile, as famous persons, some of their actions, involving their private lives, would be simulated by the public, therefore, they are highly recommed to paradigmatic not only in public but in their private lives.

In closing, this discussion over privacy leaves us some hint that there's a sharp sword hanging over famous people’s head, it is bound to fall down as long as they go too far about privacy. That is, privacy provides public figures more access to being known by all so as to exert their function as "public", however, counting on it too much will make them the only entertainment of the public as opposed to the idol of the populace, as they should be.

虽然写得比较多，但打错字很多，后来检查了一下，可能错别字还没改完。
这是限时写得最多的一次，写完一看，挖，吓我跳～～４５分钟内居然还写了这么多，还是挺高兴的．但质量肯定就差了，大家狠狠砸砖头吧～

[ 本帖最后由 sallyxindu 于 2006-2-27 01:48 编辑 ]

sallyxinduUID: 2131253

顶一下，寻互拍。

宝贝小猪UID: 2135340

我来晚了，呵呵

宝贝小猪UID: 2135340

TOPIC：ISSUE 29 - "Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested in their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy."
WORDS：663          TIME：0:45:00          DATE：2006-2-27
１，利用隐私引起被关注，提高知名度
２，人们过度关注隐私会导致不关心事物本身
３，作为公众人物该作好隐私暴光的准备，并尽量作好带头作用．

With regard to people's inborn nature of curiosity, it is not surprising that the mass would be interested in others' private affairs, though immoral it is （immoral） sometimes. Nevertheless, public figures, by definition a group of people who are focii of the public, are existing to be exposed to the populace's eys. In this sense, some hopeful and high-flying people take this advantage so as to be the focus of spotlights while other already-public figures consider it to be painfulness in that they could not even own their basic privacy and live the simple life. Even though, famous figures, as they have chosten to be public, should bear in mind that their success of pupularity may at the expense of their privacy sometimes.（你写issue的时候有一个大问题，我觉得就是开头太长，开头背景太多，修锐说那样不好，你可以稍微说一下，然后在马上陈述你的观点，考官要得不是你观点前面的铺垫，而是要你的观点，所以你大可不必在前面耗费大量精力来说背景，你完全可以放在你的论证部分来说明的，呵呵是不是说的有点严重：），其实如果可以的话我觉得你写开头3句话就行了，老师说开头最好是2－3句话）

With the blistering pace of developmental media industry, our world is becoming "smaller" and therefore many ordinary people have the opportunity to know what they are interested. Under such a circumstance, some foxy（这个词我觉得用的不好哈，ms太那个了） people make up certain seemingly striking news in order to arrest others’ attention. For example, lace news, which concerns private life of actors and other public people, （specially） in terms of their sex life in most situation, are so overwheming that they even become the poise in actors’ claiming to be famous. Due to the uniqueness and abnormality of lace news, the public are more interested in them than regular news. Thus, some ambitious people coin or even fabricate this kind of lace news as a vehicle to expose to others .When it comes to the concrete instances in this point, from Lindsay's co-called marriage with her former boyfriend to French dancer Kisody Rices' feigned claim that he was a gay, all of them are later proved to be effective stimulus through which they stand more chance to be paid attention upon by public. Undoubtedly, a certain number of prospective public figures expect others to be interested in their private lives and thus enhance their popularity.

Even though populace’s interesting in public figures’ privacy adds bullets to celebs’ fight toward being more famous, it is without doubt that privacy, more often than not, will veil people's eys,or distract people's heed from careers of these famous people to their private lives, which will eventually turn out to be a disaster to the society. Take American's president election for example, if people are too much obsessed with candidates' privacy, say, sex inclination, faith of religion and so forth, which have nothing to do with their election, their emphasis on the candidates' capability of serving as a president will be undermined. Consequently, they could not make the decision equally and reasoningly. In this sense, we know that public figures could fall back on privacy as a means to be known but they should not adopt it as a resort to win success in the comptition with others.

Deep down（deep down是什么意思啊，你经常用这个短语，有时间一定要告诉我哈）, in light of the inevitability of famous people's exposing to public, well-known characters should be ready that they cannot live a simple and private life as the ordinary people do. An striking example involves Thomas Jefferson's sex relation with Sally Heming. Consider, if Jefferson is no president, this kind of privacy is too commonplace to be mentioned, however, since he is the president, almost all of his behaviors are connected with the public and as a result, his sex life becomes people's topic in daily chat. To be an effective and able public figure,however, they should not be influenced too much by these disturbances from outside but conduct everything according to their principles. Meanwhile, as famous persons, some of their actions, involving their private lives, would be simulated by the public, therefore, they are highly recommed to paradigmatic（？？？没有看懂的说） not only in public but in their private lives.（你的例子用的很恰当，是从哪里找的呀？我就是不会找例子，呵呵，赐教）

In closing, this discussion over privacy leaves us some hint that there's a sharp sword hanging over famous people’s head（好！！）, it is bound to fall down as long as they go too far about privacy. That is, privacy provides public figures more access to being known by all so as to exert their function as "public", however, counting on it too much will make them the only entertainment of the public as opposed to the idol of the populace, as they should be.

虽然写得比较多，但打错字很多，后来检查了一下，可能错别字还没改完。
这是限时写得最多的一次，写完一看，挖，吓我跳～～４５分钟内居然还写了这么多，还是挺高兴的．但质量肯定就差了，大家狠狠砸砖头吧～

说一下结构，我觉得你应该把2、3换一下位置，应为这样的话我就觉得是＋，＋，－的结构了，比较符合辨正的思维，你这样写就是先说好，在说不好，然后又说不好了，，感觉不太合适，这个，仅仅是鄙人的一点小小的看法，有什么疑惑QQ讨论哈

[ 本帖最后由 宝贝小猪 于 2006-3-1 20:37 编辑 ]