issue38 FLY AW 小组

seltaUID: 2157580

超时5分钟，大家使劲拍吧～～～～～～
38"In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books."

time:50:00:00          words:456

提纲：
1、有许多知识是电视无法提供的，比如许多数学问题的解答，许多学术问题的研究。人们无法通过看电视成为一个科学家，却可以通过读书实现。
2、电视可以给人们提供直观的印象和生动鲜活的事例，通过看电视，人们可以对自己所生活的世界有更加形象更加直接的了解。但是，电视毕竟与书本不同，人们通过电视所获得的知识往往是一些浅显的对现象的描述，而不是深入的，体系化的知识。
3、电视是一种被动的学习方式，人们只可以选择看或是不看电视，而无法要求电视播放自己想要学习的内容。被动的接受往往限制了人们自我思考的空间，更加不利于理性思维的培养。

With the rapid development of our society, television became very popular, the programs showed on television also became more and more diverse. Some people even think that we can learn as much by watching television as we can by reading books, reading books is not so important today. However, the statement is much too shallow, people who take this statement know nothing about the huge differences between books and television.

Admittedly, television provides an active way to understand the world around us, we can visit the places we have not been to before through watching TV, we get a direct impression through the vivid pictures which we can not get from reading a book. However, there do exists something while television can not provide but books can. Academic works is a case of point. Watching television may show us planes flying in the sky, but it can not tell us what makes planes flying, as the same, television presents a colorful world in front of us, but when asking the question where are the colors come from, television can tell you nothing. One can not become a scientist by watching TV.

Most knowledge provided by television is just a presentation of phenomenon, though the phenomenon can be so active and vivid, they are too shallow. We can not get a systematic information by watching TV. Further more, even if the directors of television can make new programs to explain those academic questions, we still can not learn as much as by reading books. The reason is simple, watching television is a passive way of learning while reading books is an active way. Sitting in front of a television, we can only choose watch it or not, we can not request the television to show the things we want to learn.

The last but not the least, television is not good for our imagination and critical thinking, when reading a book, we have a wide space for our imagination cause what we get are just words. However, when watching TV, things are different, television has already presented the whole pictures in front of us, the space left for our imagination is so small. When reading a book, we control the speed, we reading and thinking, sometimes stop reading to taking some notes; When watching TV, the television controls the speed, we watching and watching, and after shut down the TV, we just remember the fantastic pictures but think of nothing.

After all, watching television is more a way of recreation than a way of learning. People choose to sit down in front of a TV because they want to take a good rest. If you really want to learn something, reading book is much a better way.

写了一篇提纲：
70"In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership."
提纲：
the author’s position: Every enterprise’s success depends on revitalization through new leadership.
My position： Revitalization through new leadership is an effective way to achieve success under some circumstances, however, its not the surest path to success for any enterprise.

1、当权者的替换对于某些职业来说是一种保持机构活力，提高机构创新能力，防止腐败，实现成功的方式。比如说在政界，总统也好，官员也好，总是有一定任期的(occupation)。
2、 但是，并不是说所有领域的当权者都需要有一个固定的任期，更不是如本论题作者宣称的那样所有领域的当权者都应当5年一换。以商界为例，CEO的任期就不是固定的，而是取决于公司的运营情况。如果股东们认为CEO不称职就可以换掉他。在其他一些行业比如教育界、科学界都是如此，仅仅根据一个固定的数值就决定当权者的去留很有可能使一些长期的、有益的项目搁浅，也可能使一些无能的当权者持续他们的错误领导。

夜一UID: 2130338

第一句话用过去式感觉怪怪的
另外又出现了这种比较低级的语法错误：
Some people even think that we can learn as much by watching television as we can by reading books, reading books is not so important today.

论述方面还是相当赞的，第三点写的尤其的好：）

linxzUID: 2225479

限时写作啊！相当不错，佩服！
论点非常的有力，特别是passive - active那个，我决定借鉴了：）
第一段开始就让步的办法，历来存在争论；
另外1 2两点存在一定的重复性。
向你学习：）

seltaUID: 2157580

确实，我后来也觉得开头让步有些怪怪的～～～～

xmbjowlUID: 2182375

为什么说这个让步不理想呢？我觉得这样论证挺合理的啊，先阐明television的客观优势