issue154 fly aw小组作业第三十五次作业

honeyviolaUID: 2199703

154."Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators."


The speaker asserts that both parents and communities are served to cultivate children. I totally agree with this statement. If education is left to a group of professional educators, the development of our children may be limited or even distorted.  

Admittedly, parents should take responsible in children’s education. Parents are familiar with children in their personalities, habits and so forth which are helpful when it comes to make decisions on schools or future. They may provide children some suggestions on what kind of school they should go to or how they use their spare time properly. Moreover, parents are children’s first teachers. From their parental roles, they are responsible for their children’s education. They can use their knowledge to help their children in studies. And more important is that the morality education given by their parents plays a vital role in their elementary education and benefit for the growth of children. President Washington who was educated by their fathers when he told a lie became a great honest man and devoted himself to the well-being of whole nation.

Professional educators also are accountable for children. With professional knowledge, professional educators are equipped to provide children necessary knowledge and inspire children’s creativities. Fro them, good academic students are not the best students. They want their children to be developed in large scale not only do well in their studies but also be a man with critical thinking, comprehensive interests and practical abilities.

However, the education is not leave solely to our parents or professional educators. For parents who are so eager to see their children’s development force children to study intensively and diligently. Thus, children’s happy leisure time is deprived and it is very dangerous for the growth of children. Furthermore, in order to achieve dreams in parents’ hearts, they usually overlook their children’s interests in subjects and give suggestions from their wishes or economic view which may be also deleterious to their children’s health mentally. Fro professional educators, they have limited time and energies to get all of their students enjoy good education. They are out of abilities to inspire and encourage each of their students. And they are also little sensitive to each student’s need. As a result, parents or professional educators are not suitable to solely educate children.

In sum, both parents and professional educators should cooperate together to provide personal education. Any of each side is weakness and need help in terms to education for children.

DexterUID: 2146102

154."Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators."


The speaker asserts that both parents and communities are served to cultivate children. I totally agree with this statement. If education is left to a group of professional educators, the development of our children may be limited or even distorted.  

Admittedly[[这个词一般出现在反面观点前吧？]], parents should take responsible in children’s education. Parents are familiar with children in their personalities, habits and so forth which are helpful when it comes to make decisions on [[[the choice of]]] schools or future. They may provide children some suggestions on what kind of school they should go to [[attend更好一些]]or how they [[could]] use their spare time properly. Moreover, parents are children’s first teachers. From their parental roles, they are responsible for their children’s education. They can use their knowledge to help their children in studies. And more important is that the morality education given by their [[这个代词的使用不妥]]parents plays a vital role in their elementary education and benefit for the growth of children. President Washington who was educated[[[教育一下似乎是中文的说法……]]] by their fathers[[[这个…… 太fz了吧……gay？还生小孩？]]] when he told a lie became a great honest man and devoted himself to the [[[pursuing the]]] well-being of whole nation.

Professional educators also are[[[调换次序]]] accountable for children. With professional knowledge, professional educators are equipped to provide children necessary knowledge and inspire children’s creativities. Fro them, good academic students are not the best students. They want their children to be developed in large scale[[[不妥]]] not only do well in their studies but also be a man with critical thinking, comprehensive interests and practical abilities.

However, the education is not leave solely to our parents or professional educators. For parents who are so eager to see their children’s development force children to study intensively and diligently. Thus, children’s happy leisure time is deprived and it is very dangerous for the growth of children. Furthermore, in order to achieve dreams in parents’ hearts, they usually overlook their children’s interests in subjects and give suggestions from their wishes or economic view which may be also deleterious to their children’s health mentally[[[mental healthy?]]]. Fro[[[For]]] professional educators, they have limited time and energies to get all of their students enjoy good education. They are out of abilities to inspire and encourage each of their students. And they are also little[[[less?]]] sensitive to each student’s need. As a result, parents or professional educators are not suitable to solely educate children.

In sum, both parents and professional educators should cooperate together to provide personal education. Any of each side is weakness[[[weak]]] and need help in terms to education for children.

个人感觉第二段的admittedly用的实在太失误了， 另外我觉得花在论证两者都不能单独完成教育工作这个观点的精力太多了，题目只说需要parents参与进来，而没有说只是让parents单独培养，讨论这个是不是显得没有必要？ 第一段你已经表态同意了题目的观点：父母应该参与。 如果你要论证“也不应该由父母单独来教育”，似乎应该在你第一段的论点里提一提。