- 最后登录
- 2010-1-14
- 在线时间
- 5 小时
- 寄托币
- 541
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2006-12-3
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 279
- UID
- 2279589

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 541
- 注册时间
- 2006-12-3
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
回复 #1 stevenhu 的帖子
The speaker asserts that only under the circumstance that education is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student is it truly effective. Perhaps some one may have the same attitude with the speaker, for it would be really efficient for one to learn what he or she needs or likes. However, I do not agree with it since the general purpose of education does not allow us to do so.
I concede that students can learn knowledge more efficiently when it meets their individual need and interest. Because they though (taught) what they learn is of great importance to them (好多they,分别指代的是谁,有点迷糊了,最好和主句一致吧), or very funny(是和of great importance并列吗?有点累赘了), students will certainly be devoted to learning and studying with passion. To some degree, most students' highly involvement (involving) in computer games can illustrate this phenomenon. In fact, it is hardly for them to receive formal education about how to play those games either in school or family, but they are really motivated by the self-satisfaction derived from it that they find various ways to learn how to play well (这个例子是说明了passion的作用,但与教育过程中的内容还是不同吧,或许举某个学科的某个名人的具体例子会更有说服力一点). At the same time (这句话更像是小结这一段吧,用这个短语在逻辑上有点不通), since individual need and interest can be fulfilled in this process, most people would surely believe education of this kind is truly effective.
However, the real aim of education is not just to provide knowledge or information according one's requirement. Modern education, as well as its ancestors, is aimed to train people's scientific reasoning skills and cultivate people's characters, thus provide society with qualified element which can advance the development of our world. Commercial, financial and political leaders, such as Bill gates, Alan Greenspan and Bill Clinton, as well as tens of thousands of common workers and clerks, are all the product of education under this general aim (Gates不是被赶出学校的吗?呵呵。我觉得这个教育的“真正目的”并不予满足个人需要矛盾啊,因为教育还是提供了不同的内容和专业,不同的人可以选择不同的方向,这些名人的例子并没有说明他们受的教育就不是满足了他们需要的。). Since education generally is a group activity, which needs work division and cooperation, it can not provide specifically tailored products. (这段的主要思想我还是认同和理解了的,但觉得在说理过程中有点偏了,而且不够深入,感觉就是说了一句话,举了一个例子就总结了。)
What is more, even if education can really (be) designed to satisfy the individual needs and hobbies of each student, this kind of education will fail to supply students with proper knowledge framework, thus is harm to student's development and is of no significant effect. As is known to all, a diversified (我不知道和diverse有什么不同呢,因为我一般用的后者,不知道你的是不是正确的) knowledge structure would provide people with more creative ideas which are of key importance to modern society. At the same time, though many people are regarded as expert or professionals because they are sophisticated and excellent enough at solving problems in certain fields, the most fundamental knowledge of other discipline learned from various kinds of formal education also contributes significantly to his or her success. The compound knowledge framework learned from education is truly effective when people steps in society and receives the real test of practice.(前面又肯定了diversity,后面又说fundamental,看起来更像是平衡的观点,并没有说明后者更重要)
To sum up, though the assertion that providing individual education seems plausible because it can satisfy one's temporary need, the general aim and real effect of modern education really proves the opposite of the assertion, that is the truly effective solution is to provide people with general purpose education.
看得出来很用心地用一些句式和长句。但是要注意变换啊,since和of + n 似乎有点多了。
整体的逻辑还是明白的,但是具体到某一段,多说几句,将轻重分清楚,会更有说服力些。
愚人只见,仅供参考:loveliness: |
|