寄托天下
查看: 1607|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] Argument15【四海一家】第四次作业 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
78
注册时间
2007-1-23
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2007-2-11 12:47:36 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

Argument15
15The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors.

"Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce their intake of foods containing fats and cholesterol, and today low-fat products abound in many food stores. Since many of the food products currently marketed by Old Dairy Industries are high in fat and cholesterol, the company's sales are likely to diminish greatly and their profits will no doubt decrease. We therefore advise Old Dairy stockholders to sell their shares and other investors not to purchase stock in this company."


The author of this newsletter suggests Old Dairy stockholders to sell their shares and other investors not to purchase stock in this company, because of the popularity of low-fat food and the tendency that Old Dairy, whose products contain normal amount of fats and cholesterol, may be predicted a decrease on their sales and subsequently profits. This suggestion seems reasonable at first glance but, examinated carefully, flaws in several fallacies as I see it.
To begin with, lacking adequate information, the survey cited by the author is hard to be considered as representative of the public’s general opinion. The fact that over 80% of the respondents indicated a desire to reduce their intake of foods containing fats and cholesterol is significantly different from the condition that 80% of customers all agree with it. Since the author fails to provide us any evidence that the survey has ruled out possibilities such as it took place only in a certain group like young girls who are commonly in found of weight losing, it is too hasty to conclude that taking less fats has already become current trend nowadays.
Even if this right the case, the desire to reduce intake of food with normal fat level does not necessarily result in realistic action, for common sense tells us that the food’s taste will inevitably decline along with its fats and cholesterol amount. Considering the possibility that many people may not willing or even capable to endure the worse taste of low-fat food even they do want to control their fat intake, the desire is likely turning out to be only a desire which will hardly become a real action and therefore bring about less threat to normal food products than the author predicts.
Further more, the mere fact that today low-fat products abound in many food stores lends no strong surpport to the author’s speculation that the sales of high-fat products will surely go down because of this influence, without evidence showing that customers tend to buy newly coming low-fat products instead of normal ones. Even if some people would like to try these new food profucts, it does not mean that they will keep on taking them and therefore does not buy any food with normal or high level fats and cholesterol any more, which is the only way leading to a decrease of Old Dairy’s sales and profits.
Finally, even assuming that Old Dairy Industry’s sales indeed diminish a little, we still can not make sure that its profits will significantly decline and further influence the price of its stock. Considering this possibility that the priceof Old Dairy’s stock has been keeping going up rapidly and the decrease of its sales and profits may by only slowes down the stock’s rising speed in value, the author’s conclusion that Old Dairy’s stock will become worthless and therefore should be sold as quickly as possible seems not very convincing to us and calls for more information and evidence.
In sum, the author’s seemingly plausible suggestion is likely to be a misleading to investors, based on such a series of unwarranted assumptions. To make his or her advice logically acceptable, the author should provide more convincing reasons and evidence to prove the inevitability that food low in fats and cholesterol will be popular and the causal relationship between the replacement and the decrease of Old Dairy’s stock price.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
27
寄托币
402
注册时间
2006-8-8
精华
0
帖子
9
沙发
发表于 2007-2-11 14:18:39 |只看该作者
The author of this newsletter suggests Old Dairy stockholders to sell their shares and other investors not to purchase stock in this company, because of the popularity of low-fat food and the tendency that Old Dairy, whose products contain normal amount of fats and cholesterol, may be predicted a decrease on their sales and subsequently profits. This suggestion seems reasonable at first glance but, examinated[examined] carefully, flaws in several fallacies as I see it[最后的句子缺乏谓语].

To begin with, lacking adequate information, the survey cited by the author is hard to be considered as representative of the public’s general opinion. The fact that over 80% of the respondents indicated a desire to reduce their intake of foods containing fats and cholesterol is significantly different from the condition that 80% of customers all agree with it [不太理解这里的意思]. Since the author fails to provide us any evidence that the survey has ruled out possibilities such as it took place only in a certain group like young girls[ladies] who are commonly in found of weight losing, it is too hasty to conclude that taking less fats[fat] has already become current trend nowadays.

Even if this right the case[好像还是缺谓语], the desire to reduce intake of food with normal fat level does not necessarily result in realistic action, for common sense tells us that the food’s taste will inevitably decline along with its fats and cholesterol amount[这个么,我觉得应该说可能会影响口感,也不能这么绝对]. Considering the possibility that many people may not willing or even capable to endure the worse taste of low-fat food even they do want to control their fat intake, the desire is likely turning out to be only a desire which will hardly become a real action and therefore bring about less threat to normal food products than the author predicts.

Further more, the mere fact that today low-fat products abound in many food stores lends no strong support to the author’s speculation that the sales of high-fat products will surely go down because of this influence, without evidence showing that customers tend to buy newly coming low-fat products instead of normal ones[this influence感觉不是很合适]. Even if some people would like to try these new food profucts[products], it does not mean that they will keep on taking them and therefore does not buy any food with normal or high level fats and cholesterol any more, which is the only way leading to a decrease of Old Dairy’s sales and profits.

Finally, even assuming that Old Dairy Industry’s sales indeed diminish a little, we still can not make sure that its profits will significantly decline and further influence the price of its stock. Considering this possibility that the price of Old Dairy’s stock has been keeping going up rapidly and the decrease of its sales and profits may [by去掉] only slowes[slow] down the stock’s rising speed in value, the author’s conclusion that Old Dairy’s stock will become worthless[只能说不适合投资而不是一点价值都没有] and therefore should be sold as quickly as possible seems not very convincing to us and calls for more information and evidence. [新的观点,可以讨论一下,不过感觉是把股票作为一种投资工具是可以这么说的,但个人感觉题目更多表达的应该是因为销售影响业绩导致投资价值下降]

In sum, the author’s seemingly plausible suggestion is likely to be a misleading to investors[be likely to语气是不是太强,只是没有给出足够的证据,不能这么绝对的说是误导吧], based on such a series of unwarranted assumptions. To make his or her advice logically acceptable, the author should provide more convincing reasons and evidence to prove the inevitability that food low in fats and cholesterol will be popular and the causal relationship between the replacement and the decrease of Old Dairy’s stock price.

[论证很充分,但是具体的过程还可以再讨论一下,可能我的观点也比较片面。写的好多啊……敬仰一下]

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
78
注册时间
2007-1-23
精华
0
帖子
0
板凳
发表于 2007-2-11 14:33:49 |只看该作者
不得不说您比我严谨多了……好多地方我都没深究,嗬嗬,谢谢

使用道具 举报

RE: Argument15【四海一家】第四次作业 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Argument15【四海一家】第四次作业
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-607999-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部