Issue83 潜移默化小组第二次作业 求拍ing！

keyyhemaUID: 2297024

TOPIC: ISSUE83 - "Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."
WORDS: 474          TIME: 1:27:51          DATE: 2007-2-13
提纲：
1、  野生环境能够造福人类。
2、  野生环境的保护往往和人类的利用发生矛盾。
3、  野生环境保护在偏远地方还算比较容易，但是离人类近的地方保持原始状态几乎是不可能的。


Most of people would share a conception that government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state and the more natural wilderness places, the better. I agree with the conception that environment plays more and more important role in today's world, but whether some of the publicly owned wilderness areas should be preserved in their natural state or be used for people to live or as a place of tourism depends on a series of factors.

Thanks to the spread of the conception of environment protecting, a myriad of people realize that only when the environment of the earth as human beings' big home to live is preserved properly, we can benefits from it.  Wilderness places preserved in their nature place would help to maintain ecological balance by the way of maintain the chain of creatures in good conditions without human beings interference. As consequence of this, some endangered species would not die away. Similarly, wilderness areas also exert their advantages in ameliorate the global climate. An apt demonstration involves the rain forests in Brazil, which are regarded as the lung of the earth for the reason of it is very critical in regulating the climate of the whole world.

If we there are only what the precious wilderness areas is good at, government may set up a law to proscribe any action to use them. Actually, preserving publicly owned wilderness areas in their nature state is at the cost of that many places where people would have been living at, enjoying pleasure or doing other things freely are not been used. Since human beings would not live with some other violent animals, there always is a long distance between the wilderness places for animal protection and the residents' town.  That means when we are happy with that we preserve a lot of animals in their natural state, we are losing the places of our own.

In fact, wilderness areas that are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people are much easier to preserve than the areas next to us but precious. As the development of civilization, that the areas around a city cannot be preserved is not to be doubted. Although we always see a march-by those who have the opinion of preserve forests as more as the government can-about objection against a policy to cut trees. How much of them would be complete successful? The use of the natural is inevitable.

In my opinion, although wilderness areas can benefit us in their natural state, we should also use some of them reasonable to preserve the development of ourselves. Government should always be cautious when making choice on salutary environment and a developing economy. In addition, preserve those areas near us would be impossible to some extent while those remote wilderness areas are more easy to preserve.