原帖由 wowolala 于 2007-3-20 12:31 发表 , ^/ c. k/ a5 O. G8 F$ T" w( d- z, b6 ~2 ^: H
+ o& r6 F4 c# c2 }# }/ w
不过到现在我还是不太明白Need-blind和need-based:confused::confused:, H" O! e' ?- k6 O9 N' U
Need-blind 只是录取政策 而need based是给钱政策4 [ |$ g3 Q. x4 ^
needblind 是说录取你的时候不参考你的财政状况! x* D6 a$ I# w5 D. u- v
然后录取完给钱时是Needbased ...
' ]/ n8 B2 n4 J6 x5 a- _( n: L1 j! M
/ p6 H& P- q0 k e6 d
你最后一个问题的答案是:肯定不录了。所以,有些学校,你的需求超出他的最高奖学金数额,这样的学校你就别浪费申请费了。 " O8 m/ D7 D+ K a2 H2 [你前面的问题,其实是你自己在混淆自己了。在录取过程中,依据财务需求在录取决定中是否起影响,分为NEED—BLIND和NEED—BASED。 5 [# N2 J) c$ J如果录取时NEED-BLIND,则学校会100%满足你的财务需求,也就是说,When Admssion selection is need-blind, FA is Need-based。如果学校的录取是Need-based,则学校在录取时,WILL FACTOR your financial needs into consideration. 然而,一旦录取你了,他也是要满足你的财务需求,否则他录取有啥意义。1 y6 r6 j8 H) Y
* F+ q% B0 ^7 Z/ S- iThe explanation above is only theoretical. In real admission process, there are VERY FEW schools that are genuinely Need-blind. Trust me. I was told of this by admissions officers many times. For example, if you don't need FA, Yale will be much easier to get in. ' Q* y/ B2 E7 j- M& |) Q ; ^- }" }/ T/ ?. S; `[ 本帖最后由 周老师 于 2007-3-20 17:44 编辑 ]