issue218

zhizi522UID：2307341

issue还完全没找到感觉，但是没几天就考了，心急如焚
iq大大给批批，重点逻辑，展开，结构方面的，语言我也不多指望了
另外狠下心给打个分吧，想心里稍有个底的说，已经个位数了离考试。。。

TOPIC: ISSUE218 - "In order for any work of art-whether film, literature, sculpture, or a song-to have merit, it must be understandable to most people."

Are the works of art valuable only when they can be understood by the populace? Answers to the question are varied due to diverse conception and function of art in the responder’s eyes. In my opinion, the artist should to some extent make the work understandable to the common people，but at the same time never to become the slave of the commonalty.

In my opinion, the value of art is based on its function to inspire people. Beauty itself is never useful until it can bring people a feeling of pleasure and happiness. Although the history of art have been long and art is now a sole system apart from the popularity, the original purpose of our ancient to create it is just to entertain ourselves rather than a specific subject with artists as specialists in it. For example, we sing a sad song when we are depressed while we dance happily when we are in good mood, from where singers and dancers derive. If one day, songs are only written for a certain small group of people (the artists), and no one else can understand and accept it and thus find no pleasure in it any more, the initial purpose of the songs are demolished. Thereby, to reach its object, artists should make their work understandable to most people.

However, too much emphasis on making the work of the artists acceptable among the common people is not wise. Education level and knowledge may prevent many people from a good understand of the essential of art. Thus, if the artist only canvasses what the common people admire most and then makes the work based on the suggestions of them, the art will lose itself in the sea and get dangerous. In addition, the value of many works can only be discovered by people in the future instead of the contemporary. But it does not mean that artist should not try this kind of art now. Most artists have a deeper feeling of life which will finally come to regular people as the society continues to develop and make it much clearer.

In short, artists should pay cogent attention to make their works acceptable to most individuals, not too little to lose the original function of art nor too much to lose the essential of it.

[ 本帖最后由 zhizi522 于 2007-4-2 21:49 编辑 ]

iq28UID：2152875

Are the works of art valuable only when they can be understood by the populace? Answers to the question are varied due to diverse conception and function of art in the responder’s eyes. (这句话精髓,给出了topic的intricacy.) In my opinion, the artist should to some extent make the work understandable to the common people, but at the same time never to become the slave of the commonalty. (这个开头写得确实不错!生动形象而且清晰明了.我最喜欢的类型)

In my opinion, the value of art is based on its function to inspire people. Beauty itself is never useful until it can bring people a feeling of pleasure and happiness. (写得真不错啊,第一句来给出艺术的价值所在,第二句由第一句的引导给出观念.) Although the history of art have been long and art is now a sole system apart from the popularity, (放在前面说,否则前面long history看了不知所云) the original purpose of our ancient to create it is just to entertain ourselves (themseleves) rather than a specific subject with artists as specialists in it. (后面论证没能再深入下去) For example, we sing a sad song when we are depressed while we dance happily when we are in good mood, from where singers and dancers derive. If one day, songs are only written for a certain small group of people (the artists), and no one else can understand and accept it and thus find no pleasure in it any more, the initial purpose of the songs are demolished. (清楚而且扣ts.比大部分人用的名人例子却不扣题要好很多) Thereby, to reach its object, artists should make their work understandable to most people.

However, too much emphasis on making the work of the artists acceptable among the common people is not wise. (两组词用得很好.有的文章一转折就彻底把前面论述的打死了.这篇good) Education level and knowledge may prevent many people from a good understand of the essential of art. Thus, if the artist only canvasses what the common people admire most and then makes the work based on the suggestions (换成requirement好一点.需求和建议还是不同的) of them, the art will lose itself in the sea and get dangerous. (晦涩了,而且下面就直接in addition了,没有详细讲解,前面的概念提出就等于没讲) In addition, the value of many works can only be discovered by people in the future instead of the contemporary. (还得往普通人的认知能力上面靠啊,否则就不搭杠了) But it does not mean that artist should not try this kind of art now. (又跟上一句不搭杠.什么叫try this kind of art now?太晦涩了) Most artists have a deeper feeling of life which will finally come to regular people as the society continues to develop and make it much clearer. (到了这里说得就更空了)

In short, artists should pay cogent attention to make their works acceptable to most individuals, not too little to lose the original function of art nor too much to lose the essential of it.

先看了只有2个body让我倒吸一口凉气
然后在word里面测了一下400字不到让我觉得这篇文章危险了
不过第一个body很清晰,觉得可能4分还有希望
但是第二个body看了就觉得4分危险了

思路很简单 正反两个观念,而且太浅.
字数应该是一个致命的问题
作为issue不到400 太说不过去了
多练习吧