issue185 [0710G Vistors互助小组]第四次作业恳请大家拍板

yulyfeiyangUID: 2295313

Issue185 ."Scandals—whether in politics, academia, or other areas—can be useful. They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could."
观点：平衡。丑闻的确能在很多社会政治事件上进行提醒，但它也可能在一些事情上，比如隐私，不那么重要，甚至若过分关注会导致失去更重要的东西。
美国安然事件，伊拉克战争
克林顿性丑闻没有使他的支持率下降，因为私生活的错误和政治上的丑闻要分开看待
Are scandals useful in calling our attention to some problems that no speaker or reformer could? I agree that in many cases scandals can serve to call our attention to sociopolitical problems that we might otherwise neglect. On the other hand, scandals aren’t much useful, particularly when they involve private affairs.
  On the one hand, scandals can serve to call nation’s attention to the pervasive problems that speaker or reformer couldn’t. The most paradigmatic example occurring recently is the Enron scandal. Before the scandal surfaced, it seemed to be a great and significant company which was the seventh biggest company in the world. At the beginning of the scandal, it would have been tempting to dismiss it as one isolated error happening in the company. But in retrospect the scandal again draw everyone’s attention to whether a company is really successful as it acclaims. The Enron scandal might be called as another Watergate scandal in the area of business.

  Let’s pay our attention to the Iraq war, which more or less might be a scandal of Mr. Brush. It created wide comment in the press that one of the reasons resulting to the war seemed to be that Mr. Brush payback to warmongers who gave support when he was presidential candidate. So no public speaker or reformer could focus our attention on the significant company or president unless scandals like these happened.

  On the other hand, scandals can’t be so useful in some cases, especially when they involve to the private affairs. Yet even a review of the private lives of past Presidents reveals Franklin Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson and John Kennedy had extramarital affairs. Thomas Jefferson, many believe, fathered children by one of his slaves. But these scandals didn’t influence their public success. More recently, through the worst of the Monica Lewinsky charges, Mr. Clinton maintained extraordinary high approval ratings for the job he was doing as President.

  To sum up, I agree that scandals are useful in drawing our attention to some underhanded sociopolitical affairs. However, in other cases, particularly in private affairs, scandals can’t be so significant to influent others. So we should treat the use of scandals case by case.   

fengyinyangUID: 2321139

Are scandals useful in calling our attention to some problems that no speaker or reformer could? I agree that in many cases scandals can serve to call our attention to sociopolitical problems that we might otherwise neglect. On the other hand, scandals aren’t much useful, particularly when they involve private affairs.
  On the one hand, scandals can serve to call nation’s attention to the pervasive problems that speaker or reformer couldn’t. The most paradigmatic example occurring recently is the Enron scandal. Before the scandal surfaced revealed, it seemed to be a great and significant company which was the seventh biggest company in the world. At the beginning of the scandal, it would have been tempting to dismiss it as one isolated error happening in the company. But in retrospect the scandal again draw everyone’s attention to whether a company is really successful as it acclaims. The Enron scandal might be called as another Watergate scandal in the area of business.缺乏分析
  Let’s pay our attention to the Iraq war, which more or less might be a scandal of Mr. Brush. It created wide comment in the press that one of the reasons resulting to the war seemed to be that Mr. Brush payback to warmongers who gave support when he was presidential candidate. So therefore好些 no public speaker or reformer could focus our attention on the significant company or president unless scandals like these happened.对于你的二三段，或许你是想从经济和政治两方面来谈论，这样的话可以单独的作为两个论点，但是最好在政治这一段的开头有一个总起，也就是提出自己的论点，另外，在举完例子以后，最好能联系自己的论点多分析一些，毕竟例子是为论点服务的，单纯的举两个例子或许还没有一个例子加上一个分析来的更有用
  On the other hand, scandals can’t be so useful in some cases, especially when they involve to the private affairs. Yet even a review of the private lives of past Presidents reveals Franklin Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson and John Kennedy had extramarital affairs. Thomas Jefferson, many believe, fathered children by one of his slaves. But these scandals didn’t influence their public success. More recently, through the worst of the Monica Lewinsky charges, Mr. Clinton maintained extraordinary high approval ratings for the job he was doing as President.同样，例证丰富，论证不足
  To sum up, I agree that scandals are useful in drawing our attention to some underhanded sociopolitical affairs. However, in other cases, particularly in private affairs, scandals can’t be so significant to influent others. So we should treat the use of scandals case by case.
呵呵，犯了一个和我刚开始一样的错误，狂举例子，就是不分析，ETS那帮人不是让你来说一些过时的新闻，是希望看到你对这些例子的分析和如何为自己的论点服务的，加油~

iq28UID: 2152875

呵呵，犯了一个和我刚开始一样的错误，狂举例子，就是不分析，ETS那帮人不是让你来说一些过时的新闻，是希望看到你对这些例子的分析和如何为自己的论点服务的，加油~


说的好

yulyfeiyangUID: 2295313

感谢大家，在百忙中看我的拙作，谢谢fenyingyang,谢谢iq28版主，我会更努力的