issue69 [sweetbox小组第三次作业] by Jordan

wm23UID: 2245087

TOPIC: ISSUE69 - "Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"
请大家猛拍吧！

    I don’t agree with the speaker that government should place as little restrictions on research and development of science as possible completely. The scientific research and development can give us a more convenient and colorful life, but it would destroy the world without restrictions.
   
    Government should placer restrictions on scientific research and development to keep its orientation is propitious to development of society. Research and development of science serves for the development of society, it should orient towards improving the nation power and the quality of people’s life. However, as we known, not all the scientific research and development are helpful to this goal; some of them even deviate form it. Under such circumstance, the restriction from government will be important and necessary. For example, nuclear weapon is a kind of destructive weapon, and its existence is a potential dangerous for every country in the world, it would destroy an area completely if some country use it in a war. Hence, the government should interfere with the research about nuclear weapon for the safe of country and the whole world as regulation of UN. The government should consider whether scientific research and development could benefit society as a criterion to restrict it.
   
    The restrictions on scientific research and development, which come from government, also can provide a more reasonable arrangement to make the acts of research and development more effective and economically. There are thousands of acts of research and development in proceeding every day, and all of this need money, material or other resources, but no one can promise that all of this will be success, or will be valuable when they get success. A lot of scientific research that time consuming and money consuming were proved totally on a wrong direction or impossible to success finally, there are also some research is successful, but its harvest can’t apply in our life, it is valueless. On the contrary, if the government convokes some experts to evaluate a large research project before it start, then make decree whether support it, that will be more reasonable and more guarantee. Government can interfere with some research that not very important and enforce the meaningful research. The rational resource scheme can accelerate these important researches and assure its probability of success.
     
    However, government should not control or restrict research and development of science at every aspect, or it may be dwarfed. Admittedly, restrictions on research and development of science placed by government can keep research in a right direction, but there still have a great necessity to give freedom to scientific research. Too strict and absurd restriction will choke the research and lead to a production without inspiration and creativity. A lot of scientists were persecuted by the government or church. A case in point is that Bruno was burned by the church, because he defends from Copernicus’ heliocentric theory that deviates from Church’s geocentric theory. Actually, I believe that every scientific research and development is under the restrictions form government, we can’t evade from these restrictions, and we don’t have to. Those restrictions sometimes interfere with us, but sometimes it also supports us. Proper restrictions also depend on a standard, so we don’t have to receive restrictions passively, but assess our research refer to the criterion positively. Whether your scientific research is benefits human should be the criterion. If the research is tally with that standard, then the restrictions will disappear too.
   
    To sum up, government place proper restrictions on research and development of science is indispensable and significative, and a legitimate scientific research will not affected by these restrictions from government, but will get support from it.

[ 本帖最后由 wm23 于 2007-6-10 18:44 编辑 ]

小破孩UID: 2125288

I don’t agree with the speaker that government should place as little restrictions on research and development of science as possible completely. The scientific research and development can give us a more convenient and colorful life, but it would destroy the world without restrictions.开头简洁,立场明确,喜欢.
   
    Government should placerplace restrictions on scientific research and development to keep its orientation is 去掉is propitious to development of society. Research and development of science serves for the development of society, it should orient towards improving the nation power and the quality of people’s life. However, as we known, not all the scientific research and development are helpful to this goal; some of them even deviate form it. Under such circumstance, the restriction from government will be important and necessary. For example, nuclear weapon is a kind of destructive weapon, and its existence is a potential dangerous for every country in the world, it would destroy an area completely if some country use it in a war. Hence, the government should interfere with the research about nuclear weapon for the safe safeyof country and the whole world as regulation of UN. The government should consider whether scientific research and development could benefit society as a criterion to restrict it.
   
    The restrictions on scientific research and development, which come from government, also can provide a more reasonable arrangement to make the acts of research and development more effective and economicallyeconomical. There are thousands of acts of research and development in proceeding proceeds? I am not so sure about "in proceeding" every day, and all of this need money, material or other resources, but no one can promise that all of this will be success, or will be valuable when they get success. A lot of scientific research that time consuming and money consuming were proved totally on a wrong direction or impossible to success finally, there are also some research is successful, but its harvest can’t apply in our life, it is valueless. On the contrary, if the government convokes some experts to evaluate a large research project before it start, then make decree whether support it, that will be more reasonable and more guarantee. Government can interfere with some research that not very important and enforce the meaningful research. The rational resource scheme can accelerate these important researches and assure its probability of success.I agree with you that experts have to evaluate the importance of research projects, however, in reality, I don't know whether you know or not, millions and millions of money are wasted in research, cause many of them don't have applications, and as one professor wrote in certain article, many many years later we may find out that only 5% of the research results are real, all the others are factitious due to artifact either in the experiment design or other reasons. So personally, I don't think your argument is persuasive cause no one can ensure their projects is significant or not even experts. Just my personal idea, I don't know what others are thinking. Hehe

     
    However, government should not control or restrict research and development of science atin? every aspect, or change ti otherwise it may be dwarfed. Admittedly, restrictions on research and development of science placed by government can keep research in a right direction, but there still have a great necessity 这里用得怪怪的, but it is still necessary to give freedom to scientific research. Too strict and absurd restriction will choke the research and lead to a production without inspiration and creativity. A lot of scientists were persecuted by the government or church. A case in point is that Bruno was burned by the church, because he defends from Copernicus’ heliocentric theory that deviates from Church’s geocentric theory. 为什么觉得这后面的评论和之前的不是很相关呢?前面说有的restriction不好,后面又说不需要反抗?还是我没看懂?Actually, I believe that every scientific research and development is under the restrictions form government, we can’t evade from these restrictions, and we don’t have to. Those restrictions sometimes interfere with us, but sometimes it also supports us. Proper restrictions also depend on a standard, so we don’t have to receive restrictions passively, but assess our research refer to the criterion positively. Whether your scientific research is benefits human should be the criterion. If the research is tally with that standard, then the restrictions will disappear too.
   
    To sum up, government placegovernment's place可以去掉吧 proper restrictions on research and development of science is indispensable and significative, and a legitimate scientific research will not affected by these restrictions from government, but will get support from it.

前一段的例子说得很好哦,我就想不出来什么例子,编也编不出来~~~郁闷,觉得最后一段body有点太多说理了,看的有点晕~~~可能我本身就有点晕
欢迎拍我的