- 最后登录
- 2018-7-30
- 在线时间
- 596 小时
- 寄托币
- 22408
- 声望
- 427
- 注册时间
- 2006-9-29
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 644
- 精华
- 55
- 积分
- 23915
- UID
- 2257608
   
- 声望
- 427
- 寄托币
- 22408
- 注册时间
- 2006-9-29
- 精华
- 55
- 帖子
- 644
|
The above argument suggests concentrate stocking of domestic and discontinuing imported cheeses to gain more profits due to five best-selling domestic cheeses last (缩得太短了会造成信息丢失, 这两天不如单写个句子来说) year and the (第一次出现的名词前加不定惯词) survey from a magazine. However, the ratiocination is neither cogent nor persuasive by falsely applying the local sales of one year to all the stores and overlooking other factors influencing the profits. Closer scrutiny would reveal several logical fallacies he commits as illustrated below.
First of all, the assertion that domesticate cheeses are more popular than imported cheeses is unconvincing.(作者没有直接提出这个assertion, 这里直白攻击就显得不妥, 可以说作者试图用两个论据来证明国产奶酪更受欢迎) The only evidence cited are the sales of five domesticate cheeses last year without overall sales comparison.(那个SURVEY也是用来证明国产奶酪更受欢迎的, 你这里可能想说的是国产奶酪卖得好, high sales和popular不是一回事, 前者是后者的结果, 后者是前者的必要条件, 而不是充分条件) Perhaps the gains from selling the imported cheeses are of similar level as that from domesticate cheeses.(这个可能性来的太没头没尾了, 你是要证明什么? 还没说前面的论据怎么不充足就转入了它因攻击, 这里的论证存在断点) In addition, myriads of variable should be taken into consideration upon the sales of the cheeses, such as the tastes, the discount, the advertisement, etc.(这个跟卖不卖有必然联系么? 如果是国产的奶酪销量确实好的话, 这些原因有没有作用都不重要, 卖的好说明有市场, 只要再有盈利就可以销售了, 这些它因即使成立对你削弱作者的论证也没任何好处) It is possible that the prices of the domesticate cheeses are on average much lower than the imported cheeses for since they don’t have the additional importing taxes. Or perhaps the company designs extensive advertisement campaign nationwide and gives great discount on these domesticate cheeses.(so? 如果成本低的话, 商店多卖国产货不是还是个很好的选择么?) Further more, it is also likely that only local residents where the new store is situated prefer the domesticate cheeses whereas customers elsewhere don’t have such significant preference.(why?) Either of these scenarios, if true, would cause serious doubt to the conclusion about the popularity of the domesticate cheeses. (这段看下来感觉你最大的问题是不知道自己要论证的是什么, 我想你这里应该是在攻击那个销量的论据, 这时要注意作者列出这个论据不是为了证明国产奶酪好吃或者国产奶酪受欢迎, 而是要证明国产奶酪好卖, 虽然前两个可能是后一个的原因, 但这种因果并不必然, 即使作者是想说明国产奶酪好吃或者受欢迎, 他的逻辑也是 国产奶酪受欢迎->国产奶酪卖的好->所以我们应该卖国产奶酪. 你只在前一个因果上做文章, 而作者其实没直接说过第一个事实, 所以你的攻击也就无效化了. 正如你所说, 奶酪卖的好还有其它很多原因, 比如广告, 比如关税, 比如成本, 不管哪个造成奶酪卖的好, 只要能卖的好商店就有足够的理由去卖它, 除非国产奶酪都是降本销售卖的好赚的少---这才是作者的问题所在)
Secondly, whether the survey from the magazine is representative or applicable to the US company is open to doubt. Without information about thenationalities or the occupations of people who respond, hardly can we make any prediction upon the cheeses sales trends. If most of the respondents are not from the US, the survey actually indicates the preference of “imported cheeses” from the view of the US company. (这里的攻击也显得没头, 为什么要怀疑国籍问题? 应该先说不知道杂志的发行范围, 然后再说SURVEY的范围, 不然这个疑问提出就显得没有依据, 很唐突)Even if most of the subscribers are from the US, the increasing preference of imported cheeses may concurrent with that of domesticate cheese just simply because people love and eat cheeses more now.(这里的表达也不精确, 应该说明没有给出对进口奶酪的喜好, 不然即使人们只是因为喜欢奶酪多了也能使国产奶酪销量上升, 同样可以作为商店多卖国产奶酪的依据) Or perhaps people responds are mainly cooks or nutrients who pay more attention about the composition and the tastes of the cheeses whereas the multitudes of the customers concern more about the prices or the discounts.(同上段的点评) And people responses may also reflect the recent fashion upon domesticate cheeses, whether this trend is applicable to all the stores or whether it would last long needs further discussion. (LZ的字数虽然多, 但论证深度却不够, 总是东一枪西一枪, 哪个也不说到底把作者抽到爽, 这样还不如集中精力攻一两种可能性)
Moreover, whether this strategy can bring more profits and whether the company should put domesticate cheeses in the first priority in all its stores nationwide needs further investigation. No evidence is provided about the inventory costs and its relation with the profits.(终于说到成本问题了, 这里最好先让步前两点能证明国产奶酪销路确实比较好) If the stocks of cheeses don’t take much room with affordable rent, the discontinue stocking of imported cheeses will make no difference. The argument is also weaken by the fact that the arguer neglect other costs such as electric charge, the maintenance and storage of cheeses, the transportation fees and labor costs, etc, all of which would contribute to the profits of a store.(笼统的小列举是论证的有效手段, 但之后应该给出一到两点specific的论证, 说明其中的某项或者某几项因素是怎么作用的, 否则这里的信息量难以make sense) Further, the stores located at metropolitans with different backgrounds of residents may need a large variety of cheeses, and customers may even complain for lack diversity.(so?)
Taken together, the argument is not well reasoned as it stands and renders it lacks credibility. Without providing hidden reasons of the sales trends last year, detail information about the survey of the magazine or factors related to the costs of a store, the augur’s suggestion cannot be adopted.
总评:
LZ的文章还是相当不错的, 特别是思路很开阔, 能想出很多有说服力的论据
本文在论证上的问题是第一点方向有误, 另外就论证不够到位, 不能直接指向作者的中心论点, 很多攻击都是没头没尾, 有意识流的风格
结构上可以加强下全文的联系, 不要一直是moreover, furthermore, secondly这种没有信息量的连接词, 适当的even grant, even if, assuming, however会让你的文章连贯很多
加油~ |
|