- 最后登录
- 2014-2-5
- 在线时间
- 122 小时
- 寄托币
- 642
- 声望
- 23
- 注册时间
- 2007-5-4
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 4
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 491
- UID
- 2335014

- 声望
- 23
- 寄托币
- 642
- 注册时间
- 2007-5-4
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 4
|
发表于 2007-7-13 14:43:21
|显示全部楼层
题目Issue51
Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student.
翻译:教育只有被专门设计来满足每一个学生个人需求和兴趣的时候才是真正有效的。
1) 反问:怎样的教育才算真正有效?我的观点:教会每一个学生如何做人才算真正有效的教育
2 ) 【从教育的结果与过程对比的谈】 教育是为大众服务的,学生最终要面对的是社会。只有通过教育,使学生获得独立的精神、正确的人生观、良好的合作意识,才能使其很好的面对社会的挑战,才能最终通过为社会做贡献而实现自己的价值;所以,教育不应该被定位在满足学生的需要和兴趣上,有些东西,比如数学和哲学,未必是每一个人都感兴趣的,但他们是我们所必须掌握的东西的,所以这些公共的必修课也没有必要单独设计
3) 从客观条件来看,专门为每一个学生具体设计显然也是不现实的,毕竟教师的资源和精力有限,所以教会学生思想,辅助他们通过实践来满足自己的需要与兴趣也许更有效
4) 另外,因材施教,通过学生的兴趣所在,引导他们更好的学习,能够更高的提高效率
5) 总结,教育的有效性是统一的前提和多样的方法的结合
附:“读史使人明智,读诗使人聪慧,演算使人精密,哲理使人深刻,伦理学使人有修养,逻辑修辞使人善辩。”<不知道我翻译的的对不对--!!!>
【history makes one advisable, poem makes one intelligent, calculating makes one precise, philosophy makes one thoughtful, ethnics makes one polite and logics makes one debatable】
How to measure the effectiveness of education? Should the standard simply focus on whether the individual get what they want? I can’t totally agree with the author’s opinion, but assert that when each of the students has learned how to be a man, the education he got can be justified as effective no matter what the process was.
On the one hand, education serves to the public, but not any single one. After years of learning, the graduates have to face the society. At that time, the only one who can help him is himself. Actually, the effective education plays a role in one's growth that gradually lead him to gain the independent spirit, the right view toward life and world, and the cooperative attitude with others. These treasures accumulate on different courses little by little, as the old say--history makes one advisable, poem makes one intelligent, calculating makes one precise, philosophy makes one thoughtful, ethnics makes one polite and logics makes one debatable. At that point, education shouldn't be limited within certain interests or needs. Though some subjects are not welcome to everyone, such as math or philosophy, they are the essentials we have to master. So in this sense, the essences of such traditional courses which have experienced thousands of years' developments and complements are suitable to the all and the only thing the young have to do is to absorb, with no specific efforts to design.
What's more, it is not objective to make up a particular schedule for each student. The number and vigor of teachers is limited, compared with the increasing number of students. One leader of China has brought forward the philosophy that "make theory combine with practice". On such condition, teaching the students theories and standing at a high pot then doing the subsidiary guidance to assist them achieve works which may satisfy their interests seem to be a more efficient way.
On the other hand, the interests and needs can be transformed into pulse to push one work harder and more active. In the old days of china, one saint has established the education notion that different means should be adopted according to different learners. The talents are various from person to person, so one of the duties educators responsible to is attempting to dig out, encourage and cultivate such talents. And the scientific researches have shown that with interests, people can stimulate their potential to the most extent.
To sum up, the efficient education is based on both the success of teaching the public and the specific strategy designed for the individual. |
|