- 最后登录
- 2009-3-4
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 430
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2006-10-1
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 375
- UID
- 2258118
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 430
- 注册时间
- 2006-10-1
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
As the author asserts, government should focus immediate problems of today rather than anticipated problems of the future, which I could not agree on. In my opinion, I concede that it is essential for the government to realize the importance of problems of today, at the same time, the problems of tomorrow should be emphasized too.
Firstly, the responsibility of a government is to solve problems of society, spreading every effort to. On one hand, some problems of today are so urge that must be solved immediately or it may have some bad effects. The problems of worker strike, which unless settled instantly would lead to decrease in production and then decrease in profits.[此例子可以把连锁的后果继续演绎下去,推出很极端的情形来证明政府不及时作为后果很严重,直接写后面的一句有点跳跃,会显得扣帽子,这个改进和后面细说的那个差不多,互相参照一下] In Sequence, the government's prestige will be damaged, and lose the respect and support of people. On the other hand, some problems will affect forever[极端的词汇慎用] unless be solved now. One of the problems of education[这样不顺^一点点而已], which the age-proper children's parents do not sent them to school, is one example. The children could go to school for study the science and technology, and may be an illiterate in future.[这个例子叙述得可以更有说服力一点,把中间的推理讲清楚, 大家都学过阿狗的,只看文中的句子,not go to school -> know little about science -> illiterate -> damage children and country,其中每一环的成立都很关键,但是似乎都只给出will,没有提到why,更不用说是证明;确实有的推理是不用证明的,直接列举就可以,但是那种情况要求你的每一环都要“让”,最少和最直接的结论可以给,不直接的结论语气要软,比如在这里,not go to school 而政府不作为-> (HIGH POSSIBLE) many not go to school ->(显然直接) have no formal education -> (MAY) 能力不被社会认可 -> (MAY)这批人将来有可能的失业 -> (MAY)可能的伴随而来的那时的其他社会问题 -> (MAY) great damage ,让人觉得可以接受,否则又有扣帽子的嫌疑,如果剧情需要,每一步可以给一个简单的解释,似乎这样子一来字数也多起来了^_^,浅见,请指正] This will not only damage the future of the children, but also the future of the country, as children is the future of society, which must be educated of our culture's continuity. All these two problems discussing above is the problems of today, no matter it is urge or will affect tomorrow, this must be attach weigh from the government.
However, the government should focus on solving the anticipated problems of the future at the same of today. As we concern, some problems of future could be anticipated and if we make plan now and even prepare to solve it, we may save some efforts when we solve it in the future or the issue will be not as serious as it predicted unless we do nothing. Consider the plan of exploring the space, which for now, we have not ever found any place other than the earth for humans to live on. Some people argue this is a waste of time, energy and money, however, to see from a long sight, it not. As population increase more and more rapidly, energy and resource of the earth will be extinct one day, if we do not plan something and do it today, we have to face to extinction of human till that day. So, seeing from a long turn, focus on solving the anticipated problems of the future is necessary and responsibility for government.
Admittedly, I concede that sometimes the government should focus on the problems of today more than the problems of tomorrow. Just like the present Iraq government, whose responsibility now is to stop the war and renew the economy, not to develop something plan for the future. But, for a government of a peace country, it must balance the two aspects.
So, as a conclusion, the two aspects, the problems of today and the anticipate problems of the future, are both essential to the society’s development. For this, the government should search a balance between them, neither to be emphasized too much.
[恰中午有事,这篇文章就说上面一个问题吧,结构已经不错了,关键是提到的这个方面,其他的我饭后来改,耽误姐姐一会儿别怪啊] |
|