issue184 【OB小组】第16次作业-stonescj-数据与理论

stonescjUID: 2359180

184."It is a grave mistake to theorize before one has data."
I fundamentally agree with the assertion that insofar as pure science and technology domains data has played a critical role before make a theory. Nevertheless, some other factors such as deduce, arithmetic and so forth are also important to the theory.

To begin with, no one can deny that data is one of the most convictable evidence to confirm the theory and conclusion. That is to say, sufficient and accurate data are absolutely necessary needed to make an important theory especially in the fields deals with various academic scientific problems. Without adequate unsuccessful data, Edison could not invented electric light and brought bright to human. Without sufficient accumulated experiment data, Faraday could not educe the famous Faraday Theory which is a milestone in the electricity domain. Without continuous experiment and practice, Einstein could not elicit the Relative Theory which is the basis theory of Physics. Without convincing data, the theory made in these fields will make no sense at all. Therefore, we have to admit that plenty of breakthroughs are outcome of our theories before acquiring reliable data.

Howbeit, it could arouse a severe result if we fake or ignore collect data before came to the conclusion. A famous chemical scientist in Peking University once said (I paraphrase):" Credible data is the soul of science. Without convincing data as the foundation of research, any theory can not stand a long." Nowadays, there are some scandals in science domain, in order to make out some production quickly and promote the status, a few of researchers faked the experimental data to blindfold people's eyes. Ultimately, these despicable behaviors would be disclosed. Besides, during the period of 1960s, China has got a bitter lesson as a result of ignore the practical data accumulation. Many regional officers have not went to the country to enquire the actual production of foodstuff, and then made a false report according to their imagination. Subsequently, the government of China has carry out a series policies based on ridiculous data, which seriously hampered the development of China for many years. As far as I concerned, it is inevitable that we should collect sufficient reliable data before come out any conclusion.

Finally, besides data support, other ingredients such as deduce, arithmetic and analysis are also important to elicit a correct put forward a correct theory. Take Chemistry for example, when a chemist is experiment, what he should do is not only gets a lot of data but also analyses those data by some analytic instrument and arithmetic. According to the analytic results, the chemist could make out the conclusion. Only every tache of the procedures waltz through could come out the ultimate conclusion.

To sum up, data is one of the most significant ingredients in research, anyone who want to create a theory should collect sufficient and convincing data. Meanwhile, other factors should also be neglected.

phillipsareaUID: 2318537

I fundamentally agree with the assertion that insofar as pure science and technology domains data has played a critical role before making a theory. Nevertheless, some other factors such as deduce, arithmetic and so forth are also important to the theory.(看来完全支持的观点)

To begin with, no one can deny that data is one of the most convictable evidence to confirm the theory and conclusion. That is to say, sufficient and accurate data are absolutely necessary needed to make an important theory especially in the fields deals with various academic scientific problems. Without adequate unsuccessful data, Edison could not invented electric light and brought bright to human. Without sufficient accumulated experiment data, Faraday could not educe the famous Faraday Theory which is a milestone in the electricity domain. Without continuous experiment and practice, Einstein could not elicit the Relative Theory which is the basis theory of Physics. Without convincing data, the theory made in these fields will make no sense at all. Therefore, we have to admit that plenty of breakthroughs are outcome of our theories before acquiring reliable data.(排比用的好,再多分析下就更好了)

Howbeit, it could arouse a severe result if we fake or ignore collect data before came to the conclusion. A famous chemical scientist in Peking University once said (I paraphrase):" Credible data is the soul of science. Without convincing data as the foundation of research, any theory can not stand a long." Nowadays, there are some scandals in science domain, in order to make out some production quickly and promote the status, a few of researchers faked the experimental data to blindfold people's eyes. Ultimately, these despicable behaviors would be disclosed. Besides, during the period of 1960s, China has got a bitter lesson as a result of ignore the practical data accumulation. Many regional officers have not went to the country to enquire the actual production of foodstuff, and then made a false report according to their imagination. Subsequently, the government of China has carry out a series policies based on ridiculous data, which seriously hampered the development of China for many years. As far as I concerned, it is inevitable that we should collect sufficient reliable data before come out any conclusion.(例子举的很有特色,但不一定老外理解的了我们当时的国情,太复杂)

Finally, besides data support, other ingredients such as deduce, arithmetic and analysis are also important to elicit a correct put forward a correct theory. Take Chemistry for example, when a chemist is experiment, what he should do is not only gets a lot of data but also analyses those data by some analytic instrument and arithmetic. According to the analytic results, the chemist could make out the conclusion. Only every tache of the procedures waltz through could come out the ultimate conclusion.

To sum up, data is one of the most significant ingredients in research, anyone who want to create a theory should collect sufficient and convincing data. Meanwhile, other factors should also be neglected.
这道题我用的是一半一半的观点,怕完全支持说不清楚,你的论证我觉得可以,看来任何观点都不是绝对的呀...呵呵

pesticideUID: 2359145

To begin with, no one can deny that data is one of the most convictable(不对) evidence to confirm the theory and conclusion. That is to say, sufficient and accurate data are absolutely necessary needed to make( absolutely necessary  for making) an important theory especially in the fields deals(dealing) with various academic scientific problems. Without adequate unsuccessful data, Edison could not invented electric light and brought bright to human. Without sufficient accumulated experiment data, Faraday could not educe the famous Faraday Theory which is a milestone in the electricity domain. Without continuous experiment and practice, Einstein could not elicit the Relative Theory which is the basis theory of Physics. Without convincing data, the theory made in these fields will make no sense at all. Therefore, we have to admit that plenty of breakthroughs are outcome of our theories before acquiring reliable data.(这一句有问题)

Howbeit, it could arouse a severe result if we fake or ignore collect(collecting) data before came to the conclusion. A famous chemical scientist in Peking University once said (I paraphrase):" Credible data is the soul of science. Without convincing data as the foundation of research, any theory can not stand a long." Nowadays, there are some scandals in science domain, in order to make out some production quickly and promote the status, a few of researchers faked the experimental data to blindfold people's eyes. Ultimately, these despicable behaviors would be disclosed. Besides, during the period of 1960s, China has got a bitter lesson as a result of ignore(ignoring) the practical data accumulation. Many regional officers have not went to the country to enquire the actual production of foodstuff, and then made a false report according to their imagination. Subsequently, the government of China has carry out a series policies based on ridiculous data, which seriously hampered the development of China for many years. As far as I concerned, it is inevitable that we should collect sufficient reliable data before come out any conclusion.

Finally, besides data support, other ingredients such as deduce, arithmetic and analysis are also important to elicit a correct put forward a correct theory.(不懂) Take Chemistry for example, when a chemist is experiment, (不懂)what he should do is not only gets a lot of data but also analyses those data by some analytic instrument and arithmetic. According to the analytic results, the chemist could make out the conclusion. Only every tache of the procedures waltz through could come out the ultimate conclusion.(不懂)

To sum up, data is one of the most significant ingredients in research, anyone who want to create a theory should collect sufficient and convincing data. Meanwhile, other factors should also be neglected.

这篇文章不像石头以往的风格?
另外，你这篇文章偏重data, theorize这个词没有涉及。