issue83 [无名小组]第八次作业

dinkyUID: 2108728

83"Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."

Should government preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are extremely remote and accessible to only a few people, as the speaker asserts? As far as I am concerned, while it is necessary to preserve some valuable wilderness, the government should not ignore the exploitation which can meet the pressing needs and desires of people.

To begin with, people need not have to go too far to see the merits of wilderness preservation, by which a myriad of species would be protected. In the remote areas that have less destruction and pollution, there would be numerous precious species which are in danger of extinction. Preserving these wilderness areas can preserve a lot of genes which may benefit the development of the biology. An apt illustration involves the preservation of Wolong-a wilderness area in the southwest of China. By keeping and restoring the environment in that area, people provide a habitation for the pandas and prevent this kind of national treasures from extinction. According to the genes of pandas, biologists can find some hints about the evolution which would foster the development of biology.

In addition, preserving some wilderness areas, especially the forests, is propitious to the environment protection. Forests, as the lung of the natural world, can keep the temperature at a favorable level by absorbing the carbon dioxide along with producing the oxygen. By preserving the forests, we can inhibit the world from becoming warmer and warmer. Take the Changbai Mountain for example. Located in the northeast of China, Changbai Mountain plays a vital role in protecting the environment of China. It is a pity that a decrease of air quality has been caused by over cutting the trees several years ago. Owing to the preserving measures took by the government, people living in the Northeast of China can breath fresh air again.

Beneficial as it is, it is impossible for the government to protect all the wilderness areas. To those deserts without valuable species but petroleum and mine, exploitation is feasible and necessary to meet people's needs. By exploiting these areas, government can get financial complementarities to deal with the pressing social problems, such as poverty, hunger, disease, national stability etc, which common people mainly care about. It is undeniable that the populace is more concerned with their direct benefits. Can you imagine that a starving person prefer wilderness areas' preservation to a piece of bread? If the government over emphasizes on the preservation and neglects the basic requirements of the common people, it would not consolidate its position and keep the society stable.

In conclusion, both the preservation and exploitation are indispensable. The best method is amalgamation of them. A wise and insightful government should find a balance between the two methods: preserving the areas with precious species and exploiting those deserts to serve to the development of the society.
感觉写得不好，狠拍

lhx1986UID: 2331807

Should government preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are extremely remote and accessible to only a few people, as the speaker asserts? As far as I am concerned, while it is necessary to preserve some valuable wilderness, the government should not ignore the exploitation which can meet the pressing needs and desires of people.

To begin with, people need not have to go too far to see the merits of wilderness preservation, by which a myriad of species would be protected. In the remote areas that have less destruction and pollution, there would be numerous precious species which are in danger of extinction. Preserving these wilderness areas can preserve a lot of genes which may benefit the development of the biology. An apt illustration involves the preservation of Wolong-a wilderness area in the southwest of China. By keeping and restoring the environment in that area, people provide a habitation for the pandas and prevent this kind of national treasures from extinction. According to the genes of pandas, biologists can find some hints about the evolution which would foster the development of biology.

In addition, preserving some wilderness areas, especially the forests, is propitious to the environment protection. Forests, as the lung of the natural world, can keep the temperature at a favorable level by absorbing the carbon dioxide along with producing the oxygen. By preserving the forests, we can inhibit the world from becoming warmer and warmer. Take the Changbai Mountain for example. Located in the northeast of China, Changbai Mountain plays a vital role in protecting the environment of China. It is a pity that a decrease of air quality has been caused by over cutting the trees several years ago. Owing to the preserving measures took by the government, people living in the Northeast of China can breath fresh air again.

Beneficial as it is, it is impossible for the government to protect all the wilderness areas. To those deserts without valuable species but petroleum and mine, exploitation is feasible and necessary to meet people's needs. By exploiting these areas, government can get financial complementarities to deal with the pressing social problems, such as poverty, hunger, disease, national stability etc, which common people mainly care about. It is undeniable that the populace is more concerned with their direct benefits. Can you imagine that a starving person prefer wilderness areas' preservation to a piece of bread? If the government over emphasizes on the preservation and neglects the basic requirements of the common people, it would not consolidate its position and keep the society stable.

In conclusion, both the preservation and exploitation are indispensable. The best method is amalgamation of them. A wise and insightful government should find a balance between the two methods: preserving the areas with precious species and exploiting those deserts to serve to the development of the society.
感觉写得不好，狠拍

感觉组长的重点应该是exploitation
while it is necessary to preserve some valuable wilderness, the government should not ignore the exploitation which can meet the pressing needs and desires of people.
可是写保护用了很大篇幅~

dinkyUID: 2108728

我的观点是保护和开发同样重要，开头没写好， 改成both the preservation and exploitation are necessary.  The government should make decisions according to different situations.

iq28UID: 2152875

Should government preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are extremely remote and accessible to only a few people, as the speaker asserts? As far as I am concerned, while it is necessary to preserve some valuable wilderness, the government should not ignore the exploitation which can meet the pressing needs and desires of people. （题目中的前提是那些地方很难保护，暗含的意思是让你讨论保护or不保护，所以讨论保护or利用显得有点不靠谱。）

To begin with, people need not have to go too far to see the merits of wilderness preservation, by which a myriad of species would be protected. In the remote areas that have less destruction and pollution, there would be numerous precious species which are in danger of extinction. Preserving these wilderness areas can preserve a lot of genes which may benefit the development of the biology. An apt illustration involves the preservation of Wolong-a wilderness area in the southwest of China. By keeping and restoring the environment in that area, people provide a habitation for the pandas and prevent this kind of national treasures from extinction. According to the genes of pandas, biologists can find some hints about the evolution which would foster the development of biology. （中规中矩的段落，也没有什么亮点。）

In addition, preserving some wilderness areas, especially the forests, is propitious to the environment protection. Forests, as the lung of the natural world, can keep the temperature at a favorable level by absorbing the carbon dioxide along with producing the oxygen. By preserving the forests, we can inhibit the world from becoming warmer and warmer. （这句话比较鸡肋。基本就是前一句的复述。也有用，但是不出彩。）Take the Changbai Mountain for example. Located in the northeast of China, Changbai Mountain plays a vital role in protecting the environment of China. （例子就是为了更形象地解释理论。你觉得这个例子在普林斯顿的阅卷人面前会被觉得清晰形象么？）It is a pity that a decrease of air quality has been caused by over cutting the trees several years ago. Owing to the preserving measures took by the government, people living in the Northeast of China can breath fresh air again. （相当严重的问题，到现在还没有出现even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people这个概念，忽略题目让你讨论的话题所在的前提。）

Beneficial as it is, it is impossible for the government to protect all the wilderness areas. To those deserts without valuable species but petroleum and mine, exploitation is feasible and necessary to meet people's needs. By exploiting these areas, government can get financial complementarities to deal with the pressing social problems, such as poverty, hunger, disease, national stability etc, which common people mainly care about. It is undeniable that the populace is more concerned with their direct benefits. Can you imagine that a starving person prefer wilderness areas' preservation to a piece of bread? If the government over emphasizes on the preservation and neglects the basic requirements of the common people, it would not consolidate its position and keep the society stable. （somewhat more interesting than the former paragraphs;) ）

In conclusion, both the preservation and exploitation are indispensable. The best method is amalgamation of them. A wise and insightful government should find a balance between the two methods: preserving the areas with precious species and exploiting those deserts to serve to the development of the society.

行文其实没什么问题，但是尽量还是把explore给隐去吧。题目应该更加希望你讨论在特定情况下preserve or not的问题。
加油;)

夜雨微蓝UID: 2308858

好像组长的重点放在要不要开发而不是要不要保护保留上了